Abstract
Individuals in streams and rivers are constantly at risk of being washed downstream and thereby lost to their population. The possibility of diffusion-mediated persistence of populations in advective environments has been the focus of a multitude of recent modeling efforts. Most of these recent models are deterministic, and they predict the existence of a critical advection velocity, above which a population cannot persist. In this work, we present a stochastic approach to the persistence problem in streams and rivers. We use the dominant eigenvalue of the advection–diffusion operator to transition from a spatially explicit description to a spatially implicit birth–death process, in which individual washout from the domain appears as an additional death term. We find that the deterministic persistence threshold is replaced by a smooth transition from almost sure persistence to extinction as advection velocity increases. More interestingly, we explore how temporal variation in flow rate and other parameters affect the persistence probability. In line with general expectations, we find that temporal variation often decreases the persistence probability, and we focus on a few examples of how variation can increase population persistence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballyk, M., & Smith, H. (1999). A model of microbial growth in a plug flow reactor with wall attachment. Math. Biosci., 158, 95–126.
Ballyk, M., Dung, L., Jones, D. A., & Smith, H. (1998). Effects of random motility on microbial growth and competition in a flow reactor. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 59(2), 573–596.
Boldin, B. (2007). Persistence and spread of gastro-intestinal infections: the case of enterotoxigenic escherichia coli in piglets. Bull. Math. Biol., 70(7), 2077–2101.
Byers, J., & Pringle, J. (2006). Going against the flow: retention, range limits and invasions in advective environments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 313, 27–41.
Hershey, A., Pastor, J., Peterson, B., & Kling, G. (1993). Stable isotopes resolve the drift paradox for baetis mayflies in an arctic river. Ecology, 74, 2315–2325.
Huisman, J., Arrayás, M., Ebert, U., & Sommeijer, B. (2002). How do sinking phytoplankton species manage to persist. Am. Nat., 159, 245–254.
Jin, Y., & Lewis, M. (2011). Seasonal influence on population spread and persistence in streams: critical domain size. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 71, 1241–1262.
John, F. (1971). Partial differential equations. Berlin: Springer.
Kolpas, A., & Nisbet, R. (2010). Effects of demographic stochasticity on population persistence in advective media. Bull. Math. Biol., 72(5), 1254–1270.
Kot, M. (2001). Elements of mathematical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lewis, M., Hillen, T., & Lutscher, F. (2009). Spatial dynamics in ecology. In M. Lewis, J. Keener, P. Maini, & M. Chaplain (Eds.), Park city mathematics series: Vol. 14. Mathematical biology. Institute of Advanced Studies.
Lutscher, F., & Seo, G. (2011). The effect of temporal variability on persistence conditions in rivers. J. Theor. Biol., 283, 53–59.
Lutscher, F., Pachepsky, E., & Lewis, M. (2005). The effect of dispersal patterns on stream populations. SIAM Rev., 47(4), 749–772.
Lutscher, F., Lewis, M., & McCauley, E. (2006). The effects of heterogeneity on population persistence and invasion in rivers. Bull. Math. Biol., 68(8), 2129–2160.
Lutscher, F., Nisbet, R., & Pachepsky, E. (2010). Population persistence in the face of advection. Theor. Ecol., 3, 271–284.
Maler, A., & Lutscher, F. (2010). Cell cycle times and the tumour control probability. Math. Med. Biol., 27(4), 313–342.
Pachepsky, E., Lutscher, F., Nisbet, R., & Lewis, M. A. (2005). Persistence, spread and the drift paradox. Theor. Popul. Biol., 67, 61–73.
Pasour, V., & Ellner, S. (2010). Computational and analytic perspectives on the drift paradox. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 9, 333–356.
Potapov, A., & Lewis, M. (2004). Climate and competition: the effect of moving range boundaries on habitat invasibility. Bull. Math. Biol., 66(5), 975–1008.
Pringle, J., Lutscher, F., & Glick, E. (2009). Going against the flow: the effect of non-Gaussian dispersal kernels and reproduction over multiple generations. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 337, 13–17.
Ryabov, A., & Blasius, B. (2008). Population growth and persistence in a heterogeneous environment: the role of diffusion and advection. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 3, 42–86.
Schreiber, S. (2010). Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal on population persistence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 277, 1907–1914.
Speirs, D., & Gurney, W. (2001). Population persistence in rivers and estuaries. Ecology, 82(5), 1219–1237.
Strohm, S., & Tyson, R. (2011). The effect of habitat fragmentation on cyclic population dynamics: a reduction to ordinary differential equations. Theor. Ecol. doi:10.1007/s12080-011-0141-1
Vasilyeva, O. (2011). Modeling and analysis of population dynamics in advective environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ottawa.
Vasilyeva, O., & Lutscher, F. (2011). Population dynamics in rivers: analysis of steady states. Can. Appl. Math. Q., 18(4), 439–469.
Vasilyeva, O., & Lutscher, F. (2012). Competition of three species in an advective environment. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl., 13(4), 1730–1748.
Zaider, M., & Minerbo, G. (2000). Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery. Phys. Med. Biol., 45, 279–293.
Acknowledgements
We thank Christina Cobbold and Olga Vasilyeva for insightful discussions. F.L. gratefully acknowledges funding in the form of an ‘Early Researchers Award’ from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 A.1 Formulas for the Drift Model
We outline the calculations that lead to the formulae presented in Sect. 4.1. We consider the probability generating function,
Using the set of (5), one can derive the first-order partial differential equation
together with the initial condition \(F(0,x)=x^{n_{0}}\). Then we employ the method of characteristics (John 1971) to find the solution F(t,x). The solution F(t,x) is constant along the characteristic curves t(s)=s and
This Riccati equation can be solved explicitly. For given t>0, we then find x(0) so that x(t)=0. Then \(p_{0}(t)=F(t,0)=F(0,x(0))=x(0)^{n_{0}}\) is the extinction probability as in (18).
To obtain the formula for periodic coefficient functions, we note the following relations. Since
and similarly for μ(z) and ε(z), we see that N(kT)=N(T)k. Then we can evaluate
Together with the formula for the geometric series, this leads to the desired formula (21).
1.2 A.2 Formulas for the Drift-Benthos Model
Following Maler and Lutscher (2010), we present a brief derivation of (7). We denote p n,m (t) as the probability that there are n drift individuals and m benthic individuals at time t. There are the following seven possibilities for having n drift and m benthic cells at time t+Δt.
-
1.
There were n+1 drift and m benthic individuals at time t and one drift individual emigrated. The probability of this event is p n+1,m (t)(n+1)εΔt+o(Δt).
-
2.
There were n drift and m+1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual died: probability p n,m+1(t)(m+1)μΔt+o(Δt).
-
3.
There were n drift and m−1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual gave birth: probability p n,m−1(t)(n+1)βΔt+o(Δt).
-
4.
There were n−1 drift and m+1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual moved to the drift: probability p n−1,m+1(t)(m+1)τΔt+o(Δt).
-
5.
There were n+1 drift and m−1 benthic individuals at time t and one drift individual settled on the benthos: probability p n+1,m−1(t)(m−1)σΔt+o(Δt).
-
6.
There were n drift and m benthic individuals at time t and no events occurred: probability p n,m (t)(1−n(ε+σ)Δt−m(β+μ+τ)Δt)+o(Δt).
-
7.
There were some number of individuals at time t and more than one event occurred: probability o(Δt).
Therefore, p n,m (t+Δt) is equal to the sum of the seven probabilities given above. Subtracting p n,m (t) from this expression, dividing by Δt, and letting Δt→0, we get (7).
Now we define P n =∑ m p n,m and Q m =∑ n p n,m , the probability that there be n drift individuals or m benthic individuals, respectively. Summing (7) with respect to m, we obtain the following equation for P n ,
Now we form expectations N d =∑ n P n and N b =∑ m Q m . From (34), we obtain an equation for N d . (Note that ∑ n ∑ m p n,m =1.)
The only term that needs closer consideration is the following:
Hence, we get the equation
The derivation of the equation for N b is similar, so that we arrive at system (9).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samia, Y., Lutscher, F. Persistence Probabilities for Stream Populations. Bull Math Biol 74, 1629–1650 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9728-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9728-y