Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Persistence Probabilities for Stream Populations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals in streams and rivers are constantly at risk of being washed downstream and thereby lost to their population. The possibility of diffusion-mediated persistence of populations in advective environments has been the focus of a multitude of recent modeling efforts. Most of these recent models are deterministic, and they predict the existence of a critical advection velocity, above which a population cannot persist. In this work, we present a stochastic approach to the persistence problem in streams and rivers. We use the dominant eigenvalue of the advection–diffusion operator to transition from a spatially explicit description to a spatially implicit birth–death process, in which individual washout from the domain appears as an additional death term. We find that the deterministic persistence threshold is replaced by a smooth transition from almost sure persistence to extinction as advection velocity increases. More interestingly, we explore how temporal variation in flow rate and other parameters affect the persistence probability. In line with general expectations, we find that temporal variation often decreases the persistence probability, and we focus on a few examples of how variation can increase population persistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballyk, M., & Smith, H. (1999). A model of microbial growth in a plug flow reactor with wall attachment. Math. Biosci., 158, 95–126.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ballyk, M., Dung, L., Jones, D. A., & Smith, H. (1998). Effects of random motility on microbial growth and competition in a flow reactor. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 59(2), 573–596.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boldin, B. (2007). Persistence and spread of gastro-intestinal infections: the case of enterotoxigenic escherichia coli in piglets. Bull. Math. Biol., 70(7), 2077–2101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J., & Pringle, J. (2006). Going against the flow: retention, range limits and invasions in advective environments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 313, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey, A., Pastor, J., Peterson, B., & Kling, G. (1993). Stable isotopes resolve the drift paradox for baetis mayflies in an arctic river. Ecology, 74, 2315–2325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, J., Arrayás, M., Ebert, U., & Sommeijer, B. (2002). How do sinking phytoplankton species manage to persist. Am. Nat., 159, 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., & Lewis, M. (2011). Seasonal influence on population spread and persistence in streams: critical domain size. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 71, 1241–1262.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • John, F. (1971). Partial differential equations. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolpas, A., & Nisbet, R. (2010). Effects of demographic stochasticity on population persistence in advective media. Bull. Math. Biol., 72(5), 1254–1270.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kot, M. (2001). Elements of mathematical ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., Hillen, T., & Lutscher, F. (2009). Spatial dynamics in ecology. In M. Lewis, J. Keener, P. Maini, & M. Chaplain (Eds.), Park city mathematics series: Vol. 14. Mathematical biology. Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutscher, F., & Seo, G. (2011). The effect of temporal variability on persistence conditions in rivers. J. Theor. Biol., 283, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutscher, F., Pachepsky, E., & Lewis, M. (2005). The effect of dispersal patterns on stream populations. SIAM Rev., 47(4), 749–772.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lutscher, F., Lewis, M., & McCauley, E. (2006). The effects of heterogeneity on population persistence and invasion in rivers. Bull. Math. Biol., 68(8), 2129–2160.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lutscher, F., Nisbet, R., & Pachepsky, E. (2010). Population persistence in the face of advection. Theor. Ecol., 3, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maler, A., & Lutscher, F. (2010). Cell cycle times and the tumour control probability. Math. Med. Biol., 27(4), 313–342.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky, E., Lutscher, F., Nisbet, R., & Lewis, M. A. (2005). Persistence, spread and the drift paradox. Theor. Popul. Biol., 67, 61–73.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pasour, V., & Ellner, S. (2010). Computational and analytic perspectives on the drift paradox. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 9, 333–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Potapov, A., & Lewis, M. (2004). Climate and competition: the effect of moving range boundaries on habitat invasibility. Bull. Math. Biol., 66(5), 975–1008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, J., Lutscher, F., & Glick, E. (2009). Going against the flow: the effect of non-Gaussian dispersal kernels and reproduction over multiple generations. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 337, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryabov, A., & Blasius, B. (2008). Population growth and persistence in a heterogeneous environment: the role of diffusion and advection. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom., 3, 42–86.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, S. (2010). Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal on population persistence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 277, 1907–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speirs, D., & Gurney, W. (2001). Population persistence in rivers and estuaries. Ecology, 82(5), 1219–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strohm, S., & Tyson, R. (2011). The effect of habitat fragmentation on cyclic population dynamics: a reduction to ordinary differential equations. Theor. Ecol. doi:10.1007/s12080-011-0141-1

  • Vasilyeva, O. (2011). Modeling and analysis of population dynamics in advective environments. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ottawa.

  • Vasilyeva, O., & Lutscher, F. (2011). Population dynamics in rivers: analysis of steady states. Can. Appl. Math. Q., 18(4), 439–469.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilyeva, O., & Lutscher, F. (2012). Competition of three species in an advective environment. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl., 13(4), 1730–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaider, M., & Minerbo, G. (2000). Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery. Phys. Med. Biol., 45, 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Christina Cobbold and Olga Vasilyeva for insightful discussions. F.L. gratefully acknowledges funding in the form of an ‘Early Researchers Award’ from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frithjof Lutscher.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A.1 Formulas for the Drift Model

We outline the calculations that lead to the formulae presented in Sect. 4.1. We consider the probability generating function,

$$F(t,x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty p_n(t)x^n.$$
(29)

Using the set of (5), one can derive the first-order partial differential equation

$$\frac{\partial F}{\partial t} +(\beta x-\mu-\varepsilon ) (1-x)\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}=0,$$
(30)

together with the initial condition \(F(0,x)=x^{n_{0}}\). Then we employ the method of characteristics (John 1971) to find the solution F(t,x). The solution F(t,x) is constant along the characteristic curves t(s)=s and

$$\frac{dx}{ds}=(\beta x-\mu-\varepsilon ) (1-x).$$
(31)

This Riccati equation can be solved explicitly. For given t>0, we then find x(0) so that x(t)=0. Then \(p_{0}(t)=F(t,0)=F(0,x(0))=x(0)^{n_{0}}\) is the extinction probability as in (18).

To obtain the formula for periodic coefficient functions, we note the following relations. Since

$$\int_0^{kT}\beta(z) \,dz = k \int _0^{T}\beta(z) \,dz,$$
(32)

and similarly for μ(z) and ε(z), we see that N(kT)=N(T)k. Then we can evaluate

$$\int_0^{kT}\frac{\beta(z)\,dz}{N(z)}=\sum _l^{k-1}\int_0^{T}\frac{\beta(z)\,dz}{N(z+lz)}=\int_0^{T}\frac{\beta(z)\,dz}{N(z)}\sum_l^{k-1}\frac{1}{N(T)^l}.$$
(33)

Together with the formula for the geometric series, this leads to the desired formula (21).

1.2 A.2 Formulas for the Drift-Benthos Model

Following Maler and Lutscher (2010), we present a brief derivation of (7). We denote p n,m (t) as the probability that there are n drift individuals and m benthic individuals at time t. There are the following seven possibilities for having n drift and m benthic cells at time tt.

  1. 1.

    There were n+1 drift and m benthic individuals at time t and one drift individual emigrated. The probability of this event is p n+1,m (t)(n+1)εΔt+ot).

  2. 2.

    There were n drift and m+1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual died: probability p n,m+1(t)(m+1)μΔt+ot).

  3. 3.

    There were n drift and m−1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual gave birth: probability p n,m−1(t)(n+1)βΔt+ot).

  4. 4.

    There were n−1 drift and m+1 benthic individuals at time t and one benthic individual moved to the drift: probability p n−1,m+1(t)(m+1)τΔt+ot).

  5. 5.

    There were n+1 drift and m−1 benthic individuals at time t and one drift individual settled on the benthos: probability p n+1,m−1(t)(m−1)σΔt+ot).

  6. 6.

    There were n drift and m benthic individuals at time t and no events occurred: probability p n,m (t)(1−n(ε+σtm(β+μ+τt)+ot).

  7. 7.

    There were some number of individuals at time t and more than one event occurred: probability ot).

Therefore, p n,m (tt) is equal to the sum of the seven probabilities given above. Subtracting p n,m (t) from this expression, dividing by Δt, and letting Δt→0, we get (7).

Now we define P n =∑ m p n,m and Q m =∑ n p n,m , the probability that there be n drift individuals or m benthic individuals, respectively. Summing (7) with respect to m, we obtain the following equation for P n ,

(34)

Now we form expectations N d =∑ n P n and N b =∑ m Q m . From (34), we obtain an equation for N d . (Note that ∑ n m p n,m =1.)

The only term that needs closer consideration is the following:

Hence, we get the equation

$$\dot{N}_d=-\varepsilon N_d-\sigma N_d+\tau N_b.$$
(35)

The derivation of the equation for N b is similar, so that we arrive at system (9).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samia, Y., Lutscher, F. Persistence Probabilities for Stream Populations. Bull Math Biol 74, 1629–1650 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9728-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-012-9728-y

Keywords

Navigation