Abstract
Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem reveals a conflict between the possible-world-based content-definition and the possible-world-based likeness-definition of verisimilitude. In Sect. 2 we show that the possible-world-based content-definition violates four basic intuitions of Popper’s consequence-based content-account to verisimilitude, and therefore cannot be said to be in the spirit of Popper’s account, although this is the opinion of some prominent authors. In Sect. 3 we argue that in consequence-accounts, content-aspects and likeness-aspects of verisimilitude are not in conflict with each other, but in agreement. We explain this fact by pointing towards the deep difference between possible-world- and the consequence-accounts, which does not lie in the difference between syntactic (object-language) versus semantic (meta-language) formulations, but in the difference between ‘disjunction-of-possible-worlds’ versus ‘conjunction-of-parts’ representations of theories. Drawing on earlier work, we explain in Sect. 4 how the shortcomings of Popper’s original definition can be repaired by what we call the relevant element approach. We propose a quantitative likeness-definition of verisimilitude based on relevant elements which provably agrees with the qualitative relevant content-definition of verisimilitude on all pairs of comparable theories. We conclude the paper with a plea for consequence-accounts and a brief analysis of the problem of language-dependence (Sect. 6).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang C.C., Keisler H.J. (1973) Model theory. North-Holland Publ. Comp, Amsterdam
Gemes K. (2007) Verisimilitude and content. Synthese 154: 293–306. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-2565-x
Kuipers T.A.F. (1982) Approaches to descriptive and theoretical truth. Erkenntnis 18: 343–378
Kuipers T.A.F. (2000) From instrumentalism to constructive realism. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Miller D. (1974) Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 166–177
Miller D. et al (1978) On the distance from the truth as a true distance. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Essays on mathematical and philosophical logic. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 166–177
Miller D. (1978) The distance between constituents. Synthese 38: 197–212
Miller D. (2006) Out of error. Aldershot, Ashgate
Mortensen C. (1983) Relevance and verisimilitude. Synthese 55: 353–365
Mott P. (1978) Verisimilitude by means of short theorems. Synthese 38: 247–273
Niiniluoto I. (1987) Truthlikeness. Reidel, Dordrecht
Niiniluoto I. (1998) Verisimilitude: the third period. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 1–29
Oddie G. (1981) Verisimilitude reviewed. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32: 237–265
Oddie, G. (2007). Truthlikeness. In N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries//truthlikenes.
Popper K. (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London
Popper K. (1972) Objective knowledge. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Popper K. (1976) A note on verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27: 147–164
Popper K. (1992) Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde (Vol. II, 7th ed.). J.C.B. Mohr, Stuttgart
Schurz G. (1991) Relevant deduction. Erkenntnis 35: 391–437
Schurz G. (1999) Relevance in deductive reasoning: A critical overview. In: SchurzG. Ursic M. (eds) Beyond classical logic. St. Augustin, Academia, pp 9–56
Schurz G. (1999) Sprachabhängigkeit wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis. In: Nida-Rümelin J. (eds) Rationalität, Realismus, Revision. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 427–434
Schurz G. (2005) Kuipers’ account to H-D confirmation and truthlikeness. In: Festa R. (eds) Logics of scientific discovery. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 141–159
Schurz G., Weingartner P. (1987) Verisimilitude defined by relevant consequence-elements. In: Kuipers T.A. (eds) What is closer-to-the-truth?. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 47–78
Stegmüller, W. (1969). Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie. Band I: Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung. Berlin: Springer.
Tichý P. (1974) On Popper’s definition of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27: 25–42
Weingartner P. (1997) Language and coding dependencies of results in logics and mathematics. In: Agazzi E., Darvas G. (eds) Philosophy of mathematics today. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 73–87
Weingartner P. et al (2000) Reasons for filtering classical logic. In: Batens D. (eds) Frontiers in paraconsistent logic. King’s College Publications, London, pp 315–327
Weingartner P. (2000) Basic questions on truth. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Zwart S.D., Franssen M. (2007) An impossibility theorem for verisimilitude. Synthese 158: 75–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schurz, G., Weingartner, P. Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude. Synthese 172, 415–436 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9399-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9399-2