Abstract
In this paper, we show that Arrow’s well-known impossibility theorem is instrumental in bringing the ongoing discussion about verisimilitude to a more general level of abstraction. After some preparatory technical steps, we show that Arrow’s requirements for voting procedures in social choice are also natural desiderata for a general verisimilitude definition that places content and likeness considerations on the same footing. Our main result states that no qualitative unifying procedure of a functional form can simultaneously satisfy the requirements of Unanimity, Independence of irrelevant alternatives and Non-dictatorship at the level of sentence variables. By giving a formal account of the incompatibility of the considerations of content and likeness, our impossibility result makes it possible to systematize the discussion about verisimilitude, and to understand it in more general terms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow K.J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy 58, 328–346
Arrow K.J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed). New York, John Wiley
Arrow K.J., Sen A.K., Suzumura K. (eds) (2002). Handbook of social choice and welfare, Vol 1. New York, Elsevier
Benthem J.F.A.K. van (1987). Verisimilitude and conditionals. In: Kuipers T.A.F. (eds), What is closer-to-the-truth?. Amsterdam, Rodopi, pp. 103–128
Britton T. (2004). The problem of verisimilitude and counting partially identical properties. Synthese 141, 77–95
Burger I.C., Heidema J. (1994). Comparing theories by their positive and negative contents. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45, 605–630
Burger I.C., Heidema J. (2002). Merging inference and conjecture by information. Synthese 131, 223–258
Burger I.C., Heidema J. (2005). For better, for worse: comparative orderings on states and theories. In: Festa R., Aliseda A., Peijnenburg J. (eds), Confirmation, empirical progress, and truth approximation. Amsterdam, New York, Rodopi, pp. 459–488
Darmstadter H. (1975). Better theories. Philosophy of Science 42, 20–27
Geanakoplos, J. (2001). Three brief proofs of Arrow’s impossibility theorem, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers no. 1123RRR.
Gorham G. (1996). Similarity as an intertheory relation. Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 63: S220–S229
Hilpinen, R. (1976). Approximate truth and truthlikeness. In M. Przełȩcki, K. Szaniawski, & R. Wójcicki (Eds.), Formal methods in the methodology of empirical sciences (pp. 19–42). Dordrecht: Ossolineum, Wroclaw, and Reidel.
Kuipers T.A.F. (1982). Approaches to descriptive and theoretical truth. Erkenntnis 18, 343–378
Kuipers T.A.F. (2000). From instrumentalism to constructive realism: On some relations between confirmation, empirical progress, and truth approximation. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Miller D. (1974). Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 166–177
Miller D. (1978). On the distance from the truth as a true distance. In: Hintikka J., Niiniluoto I., Saarinen I. (eds), Essays on mathematical and philosophical logic. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 415–435
Miller D. (2006). Out of error: Further essays on critical rationalism. Aldershot, Ashgate
Niiniluoto I. (1987). Truthlikeness. Dordrecht, Reidel
Niiniluoto I. (1998). Verisimilitude: The third period. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 1–29
Niiniluoto I. (2003). Content and likeness definitions of truthlikeness. In: Hintikka J., Czarnecki T., Kijania-Placek K., Placek T., Rojszczak A. (eds), Philosophy and logic: In search of the Polish tradition. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 27–35
Oddie G. (1986). Likeness to truth. Dordrecht, Reidel
Oddie, G. (2001). Truthlikeness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2001 edn. E. N. Zalta, (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2001/entries/truthlikeness/
Popper K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul
Popper K.R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach Revised edn. Oxford, Clarendon Press
Sarkar H. (1998). Anti-realism against methodology. Synthese 116, 379–402
Sen A.K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day. Edinburg and London, Oliver & Boyd
Tichý P. (1974). On Popper’s definition of verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 155–160
Zwart S.D. (2001). Refined verisimilitude. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zwart, S.D., Franssen, M. An impossibility theorem for verisimilitude. Synthese 158, 75–92 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9051-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9051-y