Skip to main content
Log in

Vagueness and Inductive Molding

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vagueness is epistemic, according to some. Vagueness is ontological, according to others. This paper deploys what I take to be a compromise position. Predicates are coined in specific contexts for specific purposes, but these limited practices do not automatically fix the extensions of predicates over the domain of all objects. The linguistic community using the predicate has rarely considered, much less decided, all questions that might arise about the predicate’s extension. To this extent, the ontological view is correct. But a predicate that applies in some contexts can be reasonably extended to other contexts where it is initially vague. This process of development approximates the cognitive remedy for vagueness that the epistemic view prescribes. The process is piecemeal and inductive, akin to what von Wright described as the molding of concepts.

Vagueness cannot be understood apart from the backdrop of classification, for vagueness is classification gone awry. Hence these pages explore the classification of particulars, both its clear successes and vague failures. How we classify unique particulars is the theme of Sections 2 and 3, which are primarily descriptive. Section 2 identifies a way of classifying particulars that pervades discourse of all sorts, and Section 3 illustrates its use in a field notorious for vagueness: ethics. Why a certain particular should (or should not) be classified in a certain way is a normative question, however, and it occupies Sections 4 and 5. Section 4 proposes a norm for strong arguments by analogy, and Section 5 illustrates how the norm might resolve vagueness in one kind of ethical dispute. This norm, which has a strong probabilistic component, is one way of affirming that probability is a guide to life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • E. Adams (1998) A Primer of Probability Logic CSLI Publications Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap (1942) Introduction to Semantics Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap (1945) ArticleTitle‘On Inductive Logic’ Philosophy of Science 12 72–97 Occurrence Handle10.1086/286851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Carnap (1952) The Continuum of Inductive Methods University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1963, ‘Probability and Inductive Logic’ and ‘My Basic Conceptions of Probability and Induction’, in Schilpp (ed.), pp. 71–77, 966–979.

  • Carnap, R.: 1971, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part 1’, in R. Carnap and R. Jeffrey (eds.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. I, University of California Press, Berkeley.

  • Carnap, R.: 1980, ‘A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part 2’, in R. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. II, University of California Press, Berkeley.

  • Cicero: 1967, On Moral Obligation: A New Translation of Cicero’s De Officiis, trans. John Higginbotham, Faber, London. De Officiis originally published 45–44 B.C.

  • D. Costantini (1983) ArticleTitle‘Analogy by Similarity’ Erkenntnis 20 103–114 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00166497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1982, ‘Rational Animals’, Dialectica 36, 318–327. Rpt. in LePore and McLaughlin (eds.), pp. 473–480.

  • R. Festa (1997) ArticleTitle‘Analogy and Exchangeability in Predictive Inferences’ Erkenntnis 45 229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Haack (1978) Philosophy of Logics Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1966, ‘A Two-Dimensional Continuum of Inductive Methods’, in Hintikka and Suppes (eds.), pp. 113–132.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1968, ‘Induction by Enumeration and Induction by Elimination’ and ‘Reply’, in I. Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 191–216, 223–231.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969, ‘Inductive Independence and the Paradoxes of Confirmation’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 24–46.

  • Hintikka, J. and I. Niiniluoto: 1976, ‘An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization’, in M. Przeł̧cki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wójcicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht and Ossolineum, Wrocław, pp. 57–81.

  • J. Hintikka P. Suppes (1966) Aspects of Inductive Logic North-Holland Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, R.: 1985, ‘Animal Interpretation’, in LePore and McLaughlin (eds.), pp. 481–487.

  • Kemeny, J.: 1963, ‘Carnap’s Theory of Probability and Induction’, in Schilpp (ed.), pp. 711–738.

  • T. Kuipers (1978) ArticleTitle‘On the Generalization of the Continuum of Inductive Methods to Universal Hypotheses’ Synthese 37 260–272 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00873242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Kuipers (1984) ArticleTitle‘Two Types of Inductive Analogy by Similarity’ Erkenntnis 21 63–87 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00176183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Lakoff (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, E. and B. McLaughlin (eds.): 1985, Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

  • P. Maher (2000) ArticleTitle‘Probabilities for Two Properties’ Erkenntnis 52 63–91 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005557828204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, E. and S. Laurence (eds.): 1999, Concepts: Core Readings, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, and London.

  • Mill, J. S.: 1973–1974, A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, J. M. Robson (ed.), University of Toronto and Routledge & Kegan Paul, Toronto. Originally published 1872.

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1980, ‘Analogy, Transitivity, and the Confirmation of Theories’, in L. J. Cohen and M. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 218–234.

  • I. Niiniluoto (1981) ArticleTitle‘Analogy and Inductive Logic’ Erkenntnis 16 1–34 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00219640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1988, ‘Analogy and Similarity in Scientific Reasoning’, in D. Helman (ed.), Analogical Reasoning, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 271–298.

  • W. Ong (1982) Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word Methuen London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1902, ‘Application for Support for His Logic’, Memoir 19, On Arguments, Draft E, http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/bycsp/l75/ver1/m19 (accessed April 22, 2005).

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1931–1958, in C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. Burks (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • J. Pietarinen (1972) Lawlikeness, Analogy, and Inductive Logic North-Holland Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: 1975, The Trial and Death of Socrates, trans. G. M. A. Grube, Hackett, Indianapolis.

  • H. Putnam (1983) Realism and Reason, Vol. 3 of Philosophical Papers Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Reiss (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Last Days of Eden’ Newsweek, December 3 44–46

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Rosch (1973) ArticleTitle‘Natural Categories’ Cognitive Psychology 4 328–350 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E.: 1978, ‘Principles of Categorization’, in E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 27–48. Rpt. in Margolis and Laurence (eds.), pp. 189–206.

  • Rosch, E.: 1983, ‘Prototype Classification and Logical Classification: The Two Systems’, in E. Scholnick (ed.), New Trends in Cognitive Representation: Challenges to Piaget’s Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 73–86.

  • E. Rosch C. Mervis (1975) ArticleTitle‘Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories’ Cognitive Psychology 7 573–605 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Rosch C. Mervis W. Gray D. Johnson P. Boyes-Braem (1976) ArticleTitle‘Basic Objects in Natural Categories’ Cognitive Psychology 8 382–439 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. (ed.): 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle, IL, and Cambridge University Press, London.

  • Seneca: 1996, Epistles: 66–92, trans. Richard M. Gummere, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales originally published 63–65.

  • B. Skyrms (1986) Choice and Chance EditionNumber3 Wadsworth Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Skyrms (1991) ArticleTitle‘Carnapian Inductive Logic for Markov Chains’ Erkenntnis 35 439–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 1993, ‘Analogy by Similarity in Hyper-Carnapian Inductive Logic’, in J. Earman, A. Janis, G. Massey, and N. Rescher (eds.), Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 273–282.

  • R. Sorabji (1993) Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate Duckworth London

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sorensen (1988) Blindspots Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Spohn (1981) ArticleTitle‘Analogy and Inductive Logic: A Note on Niiniluoto’ Erkenntnis 16 35–52 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00219641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Tye (1990) ArticleTitle‘Vague Objects’ Mind 99 535–557

    Google Scholar 

  • G.H. Wright Particlevon (1963) The Varieties of Goodness Routledge & Kegan Paul London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, F.: 1930–1931, ‘Logische Analyse des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs’, Erkenntnis 1, 228–248. English trans. (1977): ‘A Logical Analysis of the Concept of Probability’, in F. Waismann, Philosophical Papers, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 4–21.

  • Weems, M.: 1962, The Life of Washington, The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Weems’ ninth edition originally published 1809.

  • Welch, J.: 1997, ’Analogy in Ethics: Pragmatics and Semantics’, in Paul Weingartner, Gerhard Schurz, Georg Dorn (eds.), The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy, Die Österreichische Ludwig Wittgenstein Gesellsschaft, Kirchberg am Wechsel, pp. 1016–1021.

  • J. Welch (1999) ArticleTitle‘Singular Analogy and Quantitative Inductive Logics’ Theoria 14 207–247

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Williams (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy Harvard University Press Cambidge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Williamson (1994) Vagueness Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Wittgenstein (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Routledge & Kegan Paul London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welch, J.R. Vagueness and Inductive Molding. Synthese 154, 147–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0196-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-0196-x

Keywords

Navigation