Skip to main content

Induction, Philosophical Conceptions of

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

How induction was understood took a substantial turn during the Renaissance. At the beginning, induction was understood as it had been throughout the medieval period, as a kind of propositional inference that is stronger the more it approximates deduction. During the Renaissance, an older understanding, one prevalent in antiquity, was rediscovered and adopted. By this understanding, induction identifies defining characteristics using a process of comparing and contrasting.

Important participants in the change were Jean Buridan, humanists such as Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola, Paduan Aristotelians such as Agostino Nifo, Jacopo Zabarella, and members of the medical faculty, writers on philosophy of mind such as the Englishman John Case, writers of reasoning handbooks, and Francis Bacon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agricola, Rudolph. 1515. De Inventione Dialectica. Louvain: Alost.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1620. Novum organum. In Instauratio magna. London: John Bill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 1857–1870. Valerius terminus. In vol. 3 of The collected works of Francis Bacon. Edited by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis, and Douglas Denon Heath. London: Longmans & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. 2000. The New Organon, eds. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert. 1999. The Origine of forms and qualities, according to the corpuscular philosophy. In vol. 5 of The works of Robert Boyle. Edited by Michael Hunter and Edward Davis. London: Pickering & Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buridan, Jean. 2001. Summulae de Dialectica. Trans: Gyula Klima. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, John. 1584. Summa veterum interpretum in universam dialecticam Aristotelis. London: Thomas Vautrollier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, John. 1599. Lapis philosophicus seu commentarius in 8 libros physicorum Aristotelis in quo arcana physiologiae examinantur. Oxford: Joseph Barnes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Andrew. 1985. Fabricius and the ‘Aristotle project’ in anatomical teaching and research at Padua. In The medical renaissance of the sixteenth century, ed. A. Wear, R.K. French, and I.M. Lonie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducheyne, S., and John P. McCaskey. 2014. The sources of Mill’s views of ratiocination and induction. In Mill’s A System of Logic. Edited by Antis Loizides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, Lisa. 1988. Humanistic logic. In The Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaskey, John P. 2014. Induction in the Socratic tradition. In Shifting the paradigm: Alternative perspectives on induction, ed. P.C. Biondi and L.F. Groarke. Berlin: De Guyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nifo, Agostino. 1535. Aristotelis Stagiritae Topica inuentio in octo secta libros. Venice: Octavianus Scotus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, William. 1967–1988. Opera philosophica et theologica, ed. Gedeon Gál et al. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, John Herman. 1940. The development of scientific method in the school of Padua. Journal of the History of Ideas 1: 177–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seton, John. 1545. Dialectica. London: Tho. Berthelet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valla, Lorenzo. 1982. Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, ed. Gianni Zippel. Padua: Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, William. 1840. The history of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Thomas. 1551. The rule of reason, conteinyng the arte of logique, set forth in Englishe. London: Richard Grafton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella, Jacopo. 2014. On methods and On regressus. Edited and translated by John P. McCaskey. I Tatti Renaissance Library, vols. 58 and 59. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. McCaskey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

McCaskey, J.P. (2022). Induction, Philosophical Conceptions of. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_1054

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics