Abstract
This article presents the findings of an exploratory study of the degree to which Focus Theory, a general theory about group productivity, can be used to improve the productivity of project management activities. Guided by the theory and the principles of collaboration engineering, we developed a collaborative template for project progress status reporting. We evaluated the template in both face-to-face and distributed group interactions. The study indicated that a collaborative template helped structure status reporting activity and provided a permanent record of project status for future reference. As a result, it was efficient and effective for team leaders to prepare topics for project status meetings by using the template. The meetings became focused on topics outlined on the template and meeting participants commented that the meeting record helped them keep track of what had been either accomplished or decided. The major limitation observed for use of the template was that, when used in distributed and synchronous interactions, it needed to be augmented by voice communication because communication in text-only format, as provided by the template, was too time-consuming. We discuss implications of the research outcomes with respect to the usefulness and limitations of Focus Theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams T, Means JA, Spivey M (2008) The project meeting facilitator: facilitation skills to make the most of project meetings. Jossey–Bass Publishers
Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith DM (1985) Action science. Jossey–Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Besner C, Hobbs B (2006) The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Proj Manag J 37(3): 37–48
Blomquist T, Hällgren M, Nilsson A, Söderholm A (2010) Project-as-practice: in search of project management research that matters. Proj Manag J 41(1): 5–16
Briggs, R.O. (1994) The focus theory of group productivity and its application to the design, development, and testing of electronic Group Support Technology. Dissertation, MIS Department. University of Arizona, Tucson
Briggs RO, Kolfschoten GL, De Vreede GJ, Dean DL, Lukosch S (2009) a seven layer model of collaboration: good technology is not enough. In: 30th International conference on information systems, Phoenix
Brush AJB, Borning A (2005) Today messages: lightweight group awareness via email. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press, Big Island, Hawaii
Callahan J, Ramakrishnan S (1996) Software project management and measurement on the World-Wide-Web (WWW). In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshops on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WET ICE’96), IEEE Computer Society Press, Stanford, CA
Chen F, Romano NC Jr, Nunamaker JF Jr (2006) A collaborative project management approach and supporting software architecture. J Int Technol Inf Manag 15(2): 1–16
Chiocchio F (2007) Project team performance: a study of electronic task and coordination communication. Proj Manag Inst 38(1): 97–109
Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR (1999–2000) An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. J Manag Inf Syst 15(3): 7–149
Fjermestad J, Hiltz SR (2000–2001) Group support systems: a descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. J Manag Inf Syst 17(3): 115–161
Gilmore T, Krantz J, Ramirez R (1986) Action based modes of inquiry and the host-researcher relationship. Consultation 5(3): 161
Hunt JW (1998) Meetings are not working: there is no avoiding team meetings as companies expand and diversify, but they can be made to function more effectively. Financial Times, p 15
Intuit Survey (2003) E-Mail and spreadsheets add to workgroup confusion; tracking progress and communications are top concerns, Business Editors/High-Tech Writers. Business Wire, New York
Jones C (1995) Patterns of large software systems: failure and success, IEEE Software
Kendrick T (2010) Project management tool kit—100 tips and techniques for getting the job done right, 2nd edn. Book Division of American Management Association
Kitson DH, Masters S (1993) An analysis of SEI software process assessment results, 1987–1991. In: 15th International conference software engineering, IEEE Computer Soc. Press
Koehler K (1992) Project team management. CMA Mag 66(7):8
Kolfschoten GL, Vreede GJ De (2009) A design approach for collaboration processes: a multi-method design science study in collaboration engineering. J Manag Inf Syst 26(1): 225–256
Krumboltz JD, Worthington RL (1999) The school-to-work transition from a learning theory perspective. Career Development Quarterly (CDQ) Special Issue: School-to-Work Transitions 47(4): 312–325
Lam HE, Maheshwari P (2001) Task and team management in the distributed software project management tool. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international computer software and applications conference (COMPSAC.01), IEEE Computer Society Press
Lee SF (2008) How should team meetings flow? R.A!R.A! approach as a meeting process. J Qual Particip 31(1): 25–28
McConnell S (1997) Tool support for project tracking. IEEE Software, September/October
Nunamaker JF Jr, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel DR, George JF (1991) Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Commun ACM 34(7): 40–61
Powell A, Piccoli G, Ives B (2004) Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions of future research. ACM SIGMIS Database 35(1): 6–36
Project Management Fact Book (2001) Newtown Square, Pennsylvania Project Management Institute
Rad RF, Levin G (2003) Achieving project management success using virtual teams. J. Ross Publishing, Inc., Florida, Boca Raton
Schwaber K, Beedle M (2002) Agile software development with Scrum. The Addison Wesley Agile Software Development Series
Susman GI, Evered RD (1978) An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm Sci Q 23(4): 582–603
Vreede GJ De, Briggs RO, Massey A (2009) Collaboration engineering: foundations and opportunities. J Assoc Inf Syst 10(3): 121–137
Wheatley M (2005) The importance of project management: new research into the role of project management in a modern developed economy. http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/the-importance-of-project-management.html. Accessed 21 Nov 2012
Yin RK (1984) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, F., Nunamaker, J.F., Briggs, R.O. et al. An Application of Focus Theory to Project Management Processes. Group Decis Negot 23, 961–978 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9323-5