Abstract
We will pick up the concepts of partial and complete observables introduced by Rovelli in Conceptional Problems in Quantum Gravity, Birkhäuser, Boston (1991); Class Quant Grav, 8:1895 (1991); Phys Rev, D65:124013 (2002); Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007) in order to construct Dirac observables in gauge systems. We will generalize these ideas to an arbitrary number of gauge degrees of freedom. Different methods to calculate such Dirac observables are developed. For background independent field theories we will show that partial and complete observables can be related to Kuchař’s Bubble-Time Formalism (J Math Phys, 13:768, 1972). Moreover one can define a non-trivial gauge action on the space of complete observables and also state the Poisson brackets of these functions. Additionally we will investigate, whether it is possible to calculate Dirac observables starting with partially invariant partial observables, for instance functions, which are invariant under the spatial diffeomorphism group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold V.I. (ed.) (1988) Dynamical Systems III. Springer, Berlin
DeWitt, B.S.: The Quantization of geometry. In: Witten, L. (ed.) (1962) Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research. Wiley, New York (1962)
DeWitt B.S. (1967). Phys. Rev. 160: 1113
Dittrich, B.: Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 6155 (2006). E-print: gr-qc/0507106
Dittrich, B., Tambornino, J.: A perturbative approach to Dirac observables and their space–time algebra. Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 757 (2007). E-print: gr-qc/0610060
Dittrich, B., Thiemann, T.: Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity II: Finite dimensional examples. Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 1067–1088 (2006). E-print:gr-qc/0411139
Goldberg J.N., Lewandowski J. and Stornaiolo C. (1992). Degeneracy in loop variables. Commun. Math. Phys. 148: 377
Henneaux M. and Teitelboim C. (1992). Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Isham C.J. and Kuchař K.V. (1985). Representations of spacetime diffeomorphisms. II. Canonical geometrodynamics. Ann. Phys. 164: 316
Jacobson T. and Romano J.D. (1993). The Spin Holonomy Group in General Relativity. Commun. Math. Phys. 155: 261
Kouletsis, I., Kucha K.V.: Symplectomorphisms in history phase space: bosonic string model. E-print: gr-qc/0108022
Kuchař K.V. (1971). Canonical quantization of cylindrical gravitational waves. Phys. Rev. D4: 955
Kuchař K.V. (1972). A bubble-time canonical formalism for geometrodynamics. J. Math. Phys. 13: 768
Kuchař, K.V.: Time and interpretations of quantum gravity. In: Kunstatter, G., Vincent, D., Williams, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics. World Scientific, Singapore (1992)
Lusanna, L.: Towards a unified description of the four interactions in terms of Dirac–Bergmann observables. E-print: hep-th/9907081
Pons, J.M., Salisbury, D.C.: The issue of time in generally covariant theories and the Komar–Bergmann approach to observables in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D71, 124012 (2005). E-print: gr-qc/0503013
Reed M. and Simon B (1980). Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis. Academic Press, London
Rovelli, C.: In: Ashtekar, A., Stachel, J. (eds.) Conceptional Problems in Quantum Gravity, p. 126. Birkhäuser, Boston (1991)
Rovelli C. (1991). What is observable in classical and quantum gravity?. Class. Quant. Grav. 8: 1895
Rovelli C. (2002). Partial observables. Phys. Rev. D65: 124013
Rovelli, C.: Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007, in press)
Savvidou, N.: General relativity histories theory I: The spacetime character of the canonical description. Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 615 (2004). E-print: gr-qc/0306034
Savvidou, N.: General relativity histories theory II: Invariance groups. Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 631 (2004). E-print: gr-qc/0306036
Shanmugadhasan S. (1973). Canonical formalism for degenerate Lagrangians. J. Math. Phys. 14: 677
Smolin, L.: Time, measurement and information loss in quantum cosmology. In: Hu, B.L. et al. (eds.) College Park 1993, Directions in General Relativity, vol. 2, p. 237–292. Cambridge University Press, London, 1993, e-print: gr-qc/9301016 (2005)
Torre C.G. (1992). Is general relativity an ‘already parametrized’ theory?. Phys. Rev. D46: 3231
Torre, C.G.: Gravitational observables and local symmetries. Phys. Rev. D48, 2373 (1993). E-print: gr-qc/9306030
Torre C.G. (1991). A complete set of observables for cylindrically symmetric gravita tional fields. Class. Quant. Grav. 8: 1895
Thiemann, T.: The phoenix project: master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 2211–2248 (2006). E-print: gr-qc/0305080
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dittrich, B. Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems. Gen Relativ Gravit 39, 1891–1927 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0495-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0495-2