Skip to main content
Log in

Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the most effective content of pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) and whether educational attainment moderates these effects.

Methods

Field experiments were conducted with 529 adult smokers and 530 young adults (258 nonsmokers; 271 smokers). Participants reported responses to different pictorial HWLs printed on cigarette packages. One experiment involved manipulating textual form (testimonial narrative vs. didactic) and the other involved manipulating image type (diseased organs vs. human suffering).

Results

Tests of mean ratings and rankings indicated that pictorial HWLs with didactic textual forms had equivalent or significantly higher credibility, relevance, and impact than pictorial HWLs with testimonial forms. Results from mixed-effects models confirmed these results. However, responses differed by participant educational attainment: didactic forms were consistently rated higher than testimonials among participants with higher education, whereas the difference between didactic and testimonial narrative forms was weaker or not statistically significant among participants with lower education. In the second experiment, with textual content held constant, greater credibility, relevance, and impact was found for graphic imagery of diseased organs than imagery of human suffering.

Conclusions

Pictorial HWLs with didactic textual forms seem to work better than those with testimonial narratives. Future research should determine which pictorial HWL content has the greatest real-world impact among consumers from disadvantaged groups, including assessment of how HWL content should change to maintain its impact as tobacco control environments strengthen and consumer awareness of smoking-related risks increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO (2003) Framework convention on tobacco control. World Health Organization, Tobacco Free Initiative, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO (2009) Guidelines for implementation of Article 11 of the WHO Framework Convention On Tobacco Control (packaging and labelling of tobacco products). World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. IOM (2002) Speaking of health: assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations. National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rice RE, Atkin CK (eds) (2001) Public communication campaigns. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hornik R (ed) (2002) Public health communication: evidence for behavior change. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  6. WHO (2010) Guidelines for implementation of Article 12 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control—education, communication, training and public awareness. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham R (2011) Cigarette package warning size and use of pictures: international summary. Canadian Cancer Society, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sebrié EM, Blanco A, Glantz SA (2010) Cigarette labeling policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: progress and obstacles. Salud Pública de México 52(Supp 2):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1997) Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet 329:1436–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO (2008) WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER package. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. Franco-Marina F (2007) Adult smoking trends in Mexico: an analysis of the Mexican National Addictions Surveys. Salud Pública de México 49(Supp 2):S137–S146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Campuzano JC, Hernández-Avila M, Samet J, Méndez I, Tapia R, Sepúlveda J (2005) Comportamiento de los fumadores en México según las Encuestas Nacionales de Adicciones 1988 a 1998. In: Lazcano-Ponce E, Valdés-Salgado R, Hernández-Avila M (eds) Primer informe sobre combate al tabaquismo. México ante el Convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, pp 21–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. WHO (2004) Tobacco and poverty. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  14. Link B (2008) Epidemiological sociology and the social shaping of population health. J Health Soc Behav 49:367–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garrett BE, Dube SR, Trosclair A, Caraballo RS, Pechacek TF (2011) Cigarette Smoking—United States, 1965–2008. MMWR 60(01):109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Borland R, Wilson N, Fong GT, Hammond D, Cummings KM, Yong H et al (2009) Impact of graphic and text warnings on cigarette packs: findings from four countries over five years. Tobacco Control 18:358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fong GT, Hammond D, Hitchman SC (2009) The impact of graphic pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco health warnings. Bull WHO 87:640–643

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, Cummings KM, McNeil AD, Driezen P (2007) Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Study. Am J Prev Med 32(3):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hammond D, Fong GT, MacDonald P, Cameron R, Brown K (2003) Impact of graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behavior. Tobacco Control 12:391–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammond D, Fong GT, McNeil A, Borland R, Cummings KM (2006) Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control 15(Supp 3):iii19–iii25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Hegarty M, Pederson LL, Nelson DE, Mowery P, Gable JM, Wortley P (2006) Reactions of young adult smokers to warning labels on cigarette packages. Am J Prev Med 30(6):467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Anaya-Ocampo R, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Arillo-Santillán E, Hernández-Ávila M (2007) Estimating the impact of graphic warning labels on cigarette packs: the auction method. Addict Behav 32(12):2915–2916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Fong GT, Arillo-Santillan E (2007) Smokers’ reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: a comparison between Mexico and Canada. Salud Pública de México 49(Sup 2):S233–S240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thrasher J, Villalobos V, Szklo A, Fong GT, Pérez C, Sebrié EM et al (2010) Assessing the impact of cigarette package warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico. Salud Pública de México 52(Sup 2):S206–S215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006) The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy Washington. National Center for Education Statistics, DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thrasher JF, Price AE, Thompson ME, Borland R, Yong H, Fong GC, et al. A latent growth curve analysis of cigarette warning label wear out: findings from the ITC Four Country Survey. Under review

  27. Durkin SJ, Biener L, Wakefield M (2009) Effects of different types of antismoking ads on reducing disparities in smoking cessation among socioeconomic subgroups. Am J Public Health 99(12):2217–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thrasher J, Arillo-Santillán E, Pérez-Hernández R, Sansores R, Regalado-Piñeda J (2011) Evaluación de advertencias sanitarias de las cajetillas de tabaco: Cuatro investigaciones del impacto y recomendaciones para la Segunda Ronda de Pictogramas en México. [Cigarette package warning labels: Four studies of impact and recommendations for the second round of pictorial warning labels in Mexico]. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernvaca, México

  29. Kreuter M, Green M, Cappella J, Slater M, Wise M, Storey D et al (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Arch Behav Med 33(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. USDHHS (2006) The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  31. IARC (2009) IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: tobacco control. Methods for evaluating tobacco control policies, vol 12. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

  32. Swayampakala K, Thrasher JF, Sansores RH, Regalado J, Berg C, Carpenter M et al. Low cigarette consumption and smoking cessation in Mexico. Under review

  33. Willis GB (2005) Cognitive interviewing. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thrasher JF, Quah ACK, Dominick G, Awang R, Omar M, Borland R, et al (2011) Mixing cognitive interviewing and behavioral coding methods to determine measurement equivalence across linguistic and cultural groups: an example from international tobacco survey research. Field Meth 23(4):439–460

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cox D, Cox A (2001) Communicating the consequences of early detection: the role of evidence and framing. J Marke 65:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Slater M, Rouner D (1996) Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Commun Res 23:210–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hammond D, Thrasher JF, Reid JL, Daniel S, Driezen P, Boudreau C (2011) United States health warning study: international packaging study, preliminary results. University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weinstein ND (1999) Accuracy of smokers’ risk perceptions. Nicotine Tob Res 1:S123–S130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. White V, Webster B, Wakefield M (2008) Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents’ smoking-related beliefs and behaviors? Addiction 103(9):1562–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brennan E, Durkin S, Rish Cotter T, Harper T, Wakefield MA (2011) Mass media campaigns designed to complement new pictorial health warnings on cigarette packets: evidence of a complementary relationship. Tobacco Control 20(6):412–418

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thrasher JF, Murukutla N, Arillo-Santillán E, Pérez-Hernández R, Alday J. Creating synergies between pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages and media campaigns: a case study of Mexico. Under review

  42. Pandit AU, Tang JW, Cooper Baily S, Davis TC, Bocchini MV, Persell SD et al (2009) Education, literacy, and health: mediating effects on hypertension knowledge and control. Patient Educ Couns 75:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schillinger D, Barton LR, Karter AJ, Wang F, Adler N (2006) Does literacy mediate the relationship between education and health outcomes? A study of a low-income population with diabetes. Public Health Rep 121:245–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Matsuyama RK, Wilson-Genderson M, Kuhn L, Mohganaki D, Vachhani H, Paasche-Orlow M (2011) Education level, not lealth literacy, associated with information needs for patients with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.03.022:1-8

  45. Paasche-Orlow MK, Clarke JG, Hebert MR, Ray MK, Stein MD (2005) Educational attainment but not literacy is associated with HIV risk behavior among incarcerated women. J Womens Health 14(9):852–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. CONAPO (2005) Delimitación de las zonas metropolitanas de México 2005. Consejo Nacional de Población, Distrito Federal, México, p 2007

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saenz de Miera B, Thrasher JF, Chaloupka FJ, Watters H, Hernández-Avila M, Fong GT (2010) Self-reported price, consumption and brand switching of cigarettes in a cohort of Mexican smokers before and after a cigarette tax increase. Tobacco Control 19:481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. INSP (2009) Encuesta Mundial de Tabaquismo en Adultos, México 2009 [Global Adult Tobacco Survey, México 2009]. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública & PanAmerican Health Organization, México, p 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for data collection and analysis on this study came from the Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (Mexico 7-1), with additional support for analysis coming from CONACyT (Convocatoria Salud-2007-C01-70032) and the US National Cancer Institute (P01 CA138389). Dr Ernesto Sebrié was supported by the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James F. Thrasher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thrasher, J.F., Arillo-Santillán, E., Villalobos, V. et al. Can pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages address smoking-related health disparities? Field experiments in Mexico to assess pictorial warning label content. Cancer Causes Control 23 (Suppl 1), 69–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9899-8

Keywords

Navigation