Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection of Rare Mutations by Routine Analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Oncogenes

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Molecular genetic analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF genes was carried out in order to develop an optimal algorithm for detection of minor mutations. We analyzed 35 melanoma and 33 colorectal cancer specimens. Frequent G12D/V/A/C/S mutations were detected in KRAS. The most frequent BRAF mutation in melanoma was V600E, the percentage of rare mutations is significant for DNA diagnosis (24%). Identification of rare BRAF mutations 1790C→G (L597R), 1798_1799delinsAA (V600K), 1798_1799delinsAG (V600R), and 1799_1800delinsAA (V600E) and NRAS mutation 38G→T (G13V) was possible only by Sanger sequencing. The combination of real-time PCR and sequencing can improve analysis sensitivity and ensure concordance of the tested loci with the international recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allegra CJ, Rumble RB, Hamilton SR, Mangu PB, Roach N, Hantel A, Schilsky RL. Extended RAS gene mutation testing in metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to antiepidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy: American society of clinical oncology provisional clinical opinion update 2015. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016;34(2):179-185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boleij A, Tops BB, Rombout PD, Dequeker EM, Ligtenberg MJ, van Krieken JH.; Dutch RAS EQA Initiative. RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers. Oncotarget. 2015;6(17):15 681-15 689.

  3. De Stefano A, Carlomagno C. Beyond KRAS: predictive factors of the efficacy of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20(29):9732-9743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fariña Sarasqueta A, Moerland E, de Bruyne H, de Graaf H, Vrancken T, van Lijnschoten G, van den Brule AJ. SNaPshot and StripAssay as valuable alternatives to direct sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in colon cancer routine diagnostics. J. Mol. Diagn. 2011;13(2):199-205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopes GL, Vattimo EF, de Castro Junior Gd. Identifying activating mutations in the EGFR gene: prognostic and therapeutic implications in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2015;41(4):365-375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Magliacane G, Grassini G, Bartocci P, Francaviglia I, Dal Cin E, Barbieri G, Arrigoni G, Pecciarini L, Doglioni C, Cangi MG. Rapid targeted somatic mutation analysis of solid tumors in routine clinical diagnostics. Oncotarget. 2015;6(31):30 592-30 603.

  7. Menzies AM, Haydu LE, Visintin L, Carlino MS, Howle JR, Thompson JF, Kefford RF, Scolyer RA, Long GV. Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18(12):3242-3249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muñoz-Couselo E, Garcia JS, Perez-Garcia JM, Cebrián VO, Castán JC. Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Ann. Transl. Med. 2015;3(15):207.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shan L, Li M, Ma J, Zhang H. PCR-based assays versus direct sequencing for evaluating the effect of KRAS status on anti-EGFR treatment response in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e107926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Spagnolo F, Ghiorzo P, Orgiano L, Pastorino L, Picasso V, Tornari E, Ottaviano V, Queirolo P. BRAF-mutant melanoma: treatment approaches, resistance mechanisms, and diagnostic strategies. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:157-168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Stintzing S. Management of colorectal cancer. F1000 Prime Rep. 2014;6:108.

  12. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl. 3):iii1-iii9.

  13. Zheng G, Tseng LH, Chen G, Haley L, Illei P, Gocke CD, Eshleman JR, Lin MT. Clinical detection and categorization of uncommon and concomitant mutations involving BRAF. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Mikhailenko.

Additional information

Translated from ByulletenEksperimentalnoi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 162, No. 9, pp. 362-365, September, 2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikhailenko, D.S., Efremov, G.D., Safronova, N.Y. et al. Detection of Rare Mutations by Routine Analysis of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Oncogenes. Bull Exp Biol Med 162, 375–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3619-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3619-z

Key Words

Navigation