Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of open tension-free techniques in hernia surgery seems to be superior to those techniques that apply tension to the suture line. However, the cost-effectiveness of tension vs. tension-free repairs has not been investigated before.

Methods

This study is a cost-effectiveness analysis within a randomized controlled clinical trial that compared open-tension (OT) versus mesh-plug tension-free (MPTF) hernia repair, with a 2-year follow-up for each patient. Between July 2002 and June 2003, 106 patients with inguinal hernia were randomized to either procedure. Main outcome measures included average surgical time, time to full recovery, pain visual analog scale, amount of analgesics required, off-work time, hospital stay, and heath-care costs.

Results

The average cost was $885.15 (95% CI $843.56–$926.74) and $837.66 (95% CI $796.42–878.89) USD for the OT and the MPTF herniorrhaphy, respectively (P < 0.05). Average yearly savings with the MPTF repair were calculated as $7,598.84 USD. Surgery time, time to full recovery, pain visual-analog scale, use of analgesics, off-work time, and hospital stay were significantly lower for the MPTF repair. Disability-adjusted life-years were reduced 56% with the MPTF repair, which represented a total savings of $12,656.60 USD with this procedure.

Conclusion

This controlled clinical trial demonstrates that the MPTF technique significantly decreases care costs in patients operated on for inguinal hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results form a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:653–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nyhus L (1989) The recurrent groin hernia: therapeutic solutions. World J Sur 12:541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Janu PG, Seller KD, Mangiante EC (1997) Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: a 10-year review. Am Surg 63:1065–1069

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barth RJ, Bauchard KW, Tosteson A et al (1998) Short-term outcome after mesh or Shouldice herniorrhaphy: a randomized, prospective study. Surgery 123:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Leppälä J, Hulkko A (1997) Total cost of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs: a randomized prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 12:1199–1203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rukow IM, Robbins AW (1995) Groin hernia. In: Cameron JL (ed) Current surgical therapy. Mosby, St Louis, 481 pp

  8. Stroupe KT, Manheim LM, Luo P et al (2006) Tension-free repair versus watchful waiting for men asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Am Coll Surg 203:458–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bay-Nielsen M, Nilsson E, Nordin P, Kehlet H (2004) Chronic pain after open mesh and sutured repair of indirect inguinal hernia in young males. Br J Surg 91:1372–1376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P et al (1996) Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postoperative patient. Ann Surg 224:598–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O et al (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hynes DM, Stroupe KT, Luo P et al (2006) Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a department of veterans affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 203:445–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kald A, Anderberg B, Carlsson P et al (1997) Surgical outcome and cost-minimization-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year follow-up. Eur J Surg 163:505–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H et al (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. A randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study). Ann Surg 230:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wellgood J, Schulper MJ, Stroker D et al (1998) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ 317:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liem MSL, Haisema JAM, van der Graaf Y et al (1997) Cost effectiveness of extrapertioneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Ann Surg 226:676–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A et al (1996) An economic evaluation of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. J Public Health Med 18:41–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Motson RW (2002) Why does NICE not recommended laparoscopic hernirrhaphy? BMJ 324:1092–1094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liem M, Halsema JA, van der Graff Y, Schrijvers A, van Vroonhoven T (1997) Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Ann Surg 226:668–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brooks DC (1994) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg 129:361–366

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscpic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomized comparison. Lancet 354:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1994) Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability–adjusted life years. Bull WHO 72:429–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, General Hospital No 1, Mexican Institute of Social Security in Colima, Colima, Mexico

    E. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez & J. L. Medina-Chávez

  2. Direction of Research and Education at Western Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security in Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

    R. Anaya-Prado

  3. Corregidora # 380, Jardines de la Corregidora, C.P. 28030, Colima, Mexico

    E. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez

Authors
  1. E. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. L. Medina-Chávez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Anaya-Prado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Prieto-Díaz-Chávez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prieto-Díaz-Chávez, E., Medina-Chávez, J.L. & Anaya-Prado, R. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Hernia 13, 233–238 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0461-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0461-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation