Skip to main content
Log in

A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit

A randomized prospective study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs.

Methods: To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit.

Results: Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower.

Conclusion: Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 5 May 1997/Accepted: 28 October 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heikkinen, T., Haukipuro, K. & Hulkko, A. A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit . Surg Endosc 12, 1199–1203 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900820

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900820

Navigation