Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Decompressive craniectomy is an important method for managing refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with head injury. We reviewed a large series of patients who underwent this surgical procedure to establish the incidence and type of postoperative complications.

Methods

From 1998 to 2005, decompressive craniectomy was performed in 108 patients who suffered from a closed head injury. The incidence rates of complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy and risk factors for developing these complications were analysed. In addition, the relationship between outcome and clinical factors was analysed.

Findings

Twenty-five of the 108 patients died within the first month after surgical decompression. A lower GCS at admission seemed to be associated with a poorer outcome. Complications related to surgical decompression occurred in 54 of the 108 (50%) patients; of these, 28 (25.9%) patients developed more than one type of complication. Herniation through the cranial defect was the most frequent complication within 1 week and 1 month, and subdural effusion was another frequent complication during this period. After 1 month, the “syndrome of the trephined” and hydrocephalus were the most frequent complications. Older patients and/or those with more severe head trauma had a higher occurrence rate of complications.

Conclusions

The potential benefits of decompressive craniectomy can be adversely affected by the occurrence of complications. Each complication secondary to surgical decompression had its own typical time window for occurrence. In addition, the severity of head injury was related to the development of a complication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM (2006) Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 104:469–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adamides AA, Winter CD, Lewis PM, Cooper DJ, Kossmann T, Rosenfeld JV (2006) Current controversies in the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. ANZ J Surg 76:163–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beyerl B, Black PM (1984) Posttraumatic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 15:257–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boret H, Fesselet J, Meaudre E, Gaillard PE, Cantais E (2006) Cerebral microdialysis and P(ti)O2 for neuro-monitoring before decompressive craniectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:252–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bullock R, Hanemann CO, Murray L, Teasdale GM (1990) Recurrent hematomas following craniotomy for traumatic intracranial mass. J Neurosurg 72:9–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso ER, Galbraith S (1985) Posttraumatic hydrocephalus—a retrospective review. Surg Neurol 23:261–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carvi Y, Nievas MN, Hollerhage HG (2006) Early combined cranioplasty and programmable shunt in patients with skull bone defects and CSF-circulation disorders. Neurol Res 28:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chinese Medical Association (2006) Clinical guidelines of Chinese Medical Association: fascicule of neurosurgery. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chute DL (2002) Neuropsychological technologies in rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 17:369–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coplin WM, Cullen NK, Policherla PN, Vinas FC, Wilseck JM, Zafonte RD, Rengachary SS (2001) Safety and feasibility of craniectomy with duraplasty as the initial surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 50:1050–1059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Csokay A, Nagy L, Novoth B (2001) Avoidance of vascular compression in decompressive surgery for brain edema caused by trauma and tumor ablation. Neurosurg Rev 24:209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Ambrosio R, Perucca E (2004) Epilepsy after head injury. Curr Opin Neurol 17:731–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A (1999) Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9:271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guyot LL, Michael DB (2000) Post-traumatic hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 22:25–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H (2004) Sinking skin flap syndrome: a case of improved cerebral blood flow after cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 53:288–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kan P, Amini A, Hansen K, White GL Jr, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, Kestle JR (2006) Outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg 105(5 Suppl):337–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kilincer C, Simsek O, Hamamcioglu MK, Hicdonmez T, Cobanoglu S (2005) Contralateral subdural effusion after aneurysm surgery and decompressive craniectomy: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:412–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koller M, Ortler M, Langmayr J, Twerdy K (1999) Posterior-fossa haemorrhage after supratentorial surgery—report of three cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:587–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Konig A, Laas R, Herrmann HD (1987) Cerebellar haemorrhage as a complication after supratentorial craniotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 88:104–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kontopoulos V, Foroglou N, Patsalas J, Magras J, Foroglou G, Yiannakou-Pephtoulidou M, Sofianos E, Anastassiou H, Tsaoussi G (2002) Decompressive craniectomy for the management of patients with refractory hypertension: should it be reconsidered. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:791–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Landeiro JA, Flores MS, Lapenta MA, Galdino AC, Lazaro BC (2004) Remote hemorrhage from the site of craniotomy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 62:832–834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, Karimi A, Lapierre F, Murray G, Ohman J, Persson L, Servadei F, Stocchetti N, Unterberg A (1997) EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:286–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miki T, Nakajima N, Wada J, Haraoka J (2006) Cause of post-traumatic hydrocephalus because of traumatic aqueduct obstruction in two cases. J Trauma 61:985–989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell P, Tseng M, Mendelow AD (2004) Decompressive craniectomy with lattice duraplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:159–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Piek J (2002) Decompressive surgery in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 8(2):134–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruf B, Heckmann M, Schroth I, Hugens-Penzel M, Reiss I, Borkhardt A, Gortner L, Jödicke A (2003) Early decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty for refractory intracranial hypertension in children: results of a pilot study. Crit Care 7:R133–R138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schaller B, Graf R, Sanada Y, Rosner G, Wienhard K, Heiss WD (2003) Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of decompressive hemicraniectomy in normal brain: an experimental PET-study in cats. Brain Res 982:31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone JL, Lang RG, Sugar O, Moody RA (1981) Traumatic subdural hygroma. Neurosurgery 8:542–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Timofeev I, Hutchinson PJ (2006) Outcome after surgical decompression of severe traumatic brain injury. Injury 37:1125–1132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. The Brain Trauma Foundation (2000) The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The joint section on neurotrauma and critical care. Guidelines for cerebral perfusion pressure. J Neurotrauma 17:507–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van den Broek MD (2005) Why does neurorehabilitation fail. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:464–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yamakami I, Yamaura A (1993) Effects of decompressive craniectomy on regional cerebral blood flow in severe head trauma patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 33:616–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang XJ, Hong GL, Su SB, Yang SY (2003) Complications induced by decompressive craniectomies after traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol 6:99–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wen L, Yang XF, Liu WG, Shen G, Zheng XS, Cao F, Li G (2007) Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18:526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Y. Zhan.

Additional information

Comment

This manuscript reports one of the largest series of decompressive craniectomies performed in TBI that I have seen. In current day neurotraumatologic practice, the use of decompressive craniectomies is becoming more popular, despite the lack of class I evidence to support it's beneficial effect on outcome. Whist it was formally only considered in patients in whom medical management failed to adequately control ICP, many centers now perform a decompressive craniectomy at earlier stages. One of the reasons underlying this is the understanding that it is a relatively harmless operation without serious complications. This paper clearly shows that decompressive craniectomy should not be considered 'a harmless procedure'. Strengths are the large patient numbers and the clear insight into the time course of different complications. Relative drawbacks are that it concerns a retrospective study and that no conclusions concerning efficacy of decompressive craniectomy can be drawn, although reported outcome assessment at a fixed time point is at least as good, if not better than other series reporting on severe TBI.

Andrew Maas

University Hospital Antwerp

Belgium

X. F. Yang and L. Wen contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X.F., Wen, L., Shen, F. et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150, 1241–1248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9

Keywords

Navigation