Abstracts
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to measure the structures of the ventral of lateral masses using cadaver specimens and to quantitatively compare the safety zone for the two major techniques used on each vertebral level from C3 to C6.
Methods
This study is based on 52 cervical vertebrae of 13 cadavers. The anatomical measurements focused on the anterior surface of the lateral mass. We investigated the safety width, heights, and the height of nerve roots.
Results
The mean values of the safety width of the Magerl technique from C3 to C6 were 6.1, 7.3, 6.4 and 4.3 mm, respectively. The mean values of the safety width of the Roy-Camille technique were 6.7, 6.6, 5.8 and 5.4 mm, respectively. The mean values of the safety height of the Magerl technique were 5.0, 5.4, 5.8 and 5.2 mm, respectively. The mean values of the safety height of the Roy-Camille technique were 4.9, 4.0, 1.0 and −1.2 mm, respectively. The mean values of the nerve root height were 3.9, 4.9, 5.9 and 6.9 mm, respectively.
Conclusion
The safety width of the Magerl technique was shorter at C6 because the vertebral artery runs more laterally at C6. The height for the Magerl technique was not significantly different from C3 to C6, however, the safety height for the Roy-Camille technique was significantly shorter at C5 and C6. Our findings suggest that it is important to ensure that the screw(s) penetrate through the cranial side of the ventral aspect of a lateral mass when performing the Magerl technique at all vertebral levels, and to carefully select the screw length when using the Roy-Camille technique, especially at C5 and C6, in order to avoid nerve root injury.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An HS, Gordin R, Renner K (1991) Anatomic consideration for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine. Spine 16(Suppl):S548–S551
Anderson PA, Henley MB, Grady MS, Montesano PX, Winn HR (1991) Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plate and bone graft. Spine 16(Suppl):S72–S79
Barrey C, Mertens P, Jund J et al (2005) Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques. Spine 30:E140–E147
Cho KH, Shin YS, Yoon SH et al (2005) Poor surgical technique in cervical plating leading to vertebral artery injury and brain stem infarction—Case report. Surg Neurol 64:221–225
Choueka J, Spivak JM, Kummer FJ, Steger T (1996) Fixation failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Spine 21:462–468
Deen HG, Nottmeier EW, Reimer R (2006) Early complications of posterior rod-screw fixation of the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 59:1062–1067 (discussion 7–8)
Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1996) The location of the vertebral artery foramen and its relation to posterior lateral mass screw fixation. Spine 21:1291–1295
Ebraheim NA, Klausner T, Xu R et al (1998) Safe lateral mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl technique Anatomic study. Spine 23:1739–1742
Gill K, Paschal S, Corin J, Asham R, Bucholz R (1988) Posterior plating of the cervical spine: a biomechanical comparison of different posterior fusion techniques. Spine 13:813–816
Graham AW, Swank ML, Kinard RE, Lowery GL, Dials BE (1996) Posterior cervical arthrodesis and stabilization with a lateral mass plate: clinical and computed tomography evaluation of lateral mass screw placement and associated complications. Spine 21:323–329
Heller JG, Garlson GD, Abitbol J, Garfin SR (1991) Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement. Spine 16(suppl):S552–S557
Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward J (1991) Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine 16(suppl):S56–S63
Levine AM, Mazel C, Roy-Camille R (1992) Management fracture separations of the articular mass using posterior cervical plating. Spine 17:S447–S454
Muffoletto AJ, Yang J, Vadhva M et al (2003) Cervical stability with lateral mass plating: unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase. Spine 28:778–781
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Lavile C, Mazel C (1989) Internal fixation of lower cervical spine by a posterior osteosynthesis with plates and screws. In: Cervical Spine Research Society (ed) The cervical spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippicott, Philadelphia, pp 390–430
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Berteaux D, Serge MA (1992) Treatment of lower cervical spinal injuries-C3 to C7. Spine 17(Suppl):S442–S446
Sekhon LH (2005) Posterior cervical lateral mass screw fixation, analysis of 1026 consecutive screws in 143 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:297–303
Stemper BD, Marawar SV et al (2004) Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass. An analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-camille and Magerl techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:102–107
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishinome, M., Iizuka, H., Iizuka, Y. et al. Anatomy of subaxial cervical foramens: the safety zone for lateral mass screwing. Eur Spine J 21, 309–313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1984-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1984-2