Skip to main content
Log in

Proposal for a new trajectory for subaxial cervical lateral mass screws

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Lateral mass screws combined with rods are the standard method for posterior cervical spine subaxial fixation. Several techniques have been described, among which the most used are Roy Camille, Magerl, Anderson and An. All of them are based on tridimensional angles. Reliability of freehand angle estimation remains poorly investigated. We propose a new technique based on on-site spatial references and compare it with previously described ones assessing screw length and neurovascular potential complications.

Methods

Four different lateral mass screw insertion techniques (Magerl, Anderson, An and the new described technique) were performed bilaterally, from C3 to C6, in ten human spine specimens. A drill tip guide wire was inserted as originally described for each trajectory, and screw length was measured. Exit point was examined, and potential vertebral artery or nerve root injury was assessed.

Results

Mean screw length was 14.05 mm using Magerl’s technique, 13.47 mm using Anderson’s, 12.8 mm using An’s and 17.03 mm using the new technique. Data analysis showed significantly longer lateral mass screw length using the new technique (p value < 0.00001). Nerve potential injury occurred 37 times using Magerl’s technique, 28 using Anderson’s, 13 using An’s and twice using the new technique. Vertebral artery potential injury occurred once using Magerl’s technique, 8 times using Anderson’s and none using either An’s or the new proposed technique. The risk of neurovascular complication was significantly lower using the new technique (p value < 0.01).

Conclusion

The new proposed technique allows for longer screws, maximizing purchase and stability, while lowering the complication rate.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu R, Haman SP, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA (1999) The anatomic relation of lateral mass screws to the spinal nerves. A comparison of the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2057–2061. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199910010-00016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ebraheim NA, Klausner T, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1998) Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1739–1742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coe JD, Vaccaro AR, Dailey AT, Sasso RC, Ludwig SC, Harrop JS et al (2014) Lateral mass screw fixation in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 20:592–596. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.spine13850 (author reply 596)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurd MF, Millhouse PW, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR (2015) Lateral mass fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baek JW, Park DM, Kim DH (2010) Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase: cadaveric study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48:193–198. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Nien YH, Nachwalter R, Vaccaro A, Albert TJ et al (2001) A comparison of three screw types for unicortical fixation in the lateral mass of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2427–2431. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111150-00006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G (1972) Surgery of the cervical spine. 1. True dislocations of the articular processes. Nouv Presse Med 1:2330–2332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Laville C, Benazet JP (1992) Treatment of lower cervical spinal injuries—C3 to C7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:S442–S446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward EH, Ward JC (1991) Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S56–S63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson PA, Henley MB, Grady MS, Montesano PX, Winn HR (1991) Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plates and bone graft. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S72–S79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. An HS, Gordin R, Renner K (1991) Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S548–S551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hockel K, Maier G, Rathgeb J, Merkle M, Roser F (2014) Morphometric subaxial lateral mass evaluation allows for preoperative optimal screw trajectory planning. Eur Spine J 23:1705–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3350-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu JC, Huang WC, Chen YC, Shih YH, Cheng H (2008) Stabilization of subaxial cervical spines by lateral mass screw fixation with modified Magerl’s technique. Surg Neurol 70:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perrin G (2005) Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heller JG, Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, Garfin SR (1991) Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:S552–S557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stemper BD, Marawar SV, Yoganandan N, Shender BS, Rao RD (2008) Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:893–897. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31816b4666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Merola AA, Castro BA, Alongi PR, Mathur S, Brkaric M, Vigna F et al (2002) Anatomic considerations for standard and modified techniques of cervical lateral mass screw placement. Spine J 2:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00461-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D (1996) Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 118:391–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perren S, Cordey J, Baumgart F et al (1992) Technical and biomechanical aspects of screws used for bone surgery. Int J Orthop Trauma 2:31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bayley E, Zia Z, Kerslake R, Klezl Z, Boszczyk BM (2010) Lamina-guided lateral mass screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine. Eur Spine J 19:660–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1228-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org

  22. Inoue S, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Okada F, Maruo K, Horinouchi Y et al (2012) Cervical lateral mass screw fixation without fluoroscopic control: analysis of risk factors for complications associated with screw insertion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:947–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1507-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Inoue S, Moriyama T, Tachibana T, Okada F, Maruo K, Horinouchi Y et al (2014) Risk factors for intraoperative lateral mass fracture of lateral mass screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 20:11–17. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.SPINE121055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Katonis P, Papadakis SA, Galanakos S, Paskou D, Bano A, Sapkas G et al (2011) Lateral mass screw complications: analysis of 1662 screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182024c06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ra IH, Min WK (2014) Radiographic and clinical assessment of a freehand lateral mass screw fixation technique: is it always safe in subaxial cervical spine? Spine J 14:2224–2230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None received from any external funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximo-Alberto Diez-Ulloa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study and procedures were approved by the institutional review board and ethics committee.

Informed consent

Informed generic consent was obtained from all the donors while still alive to use their bodies in studies as the one presented by the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 1828 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amhaz-Escanlar, S., Jorge-Mora, A., Jorge-Mora, T. et al. Proposal for a new trajectory for subaxial cervical lateral mass screws. Eur Spine J 27, 2738–2744 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5670-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5670-5

Keywords

Navigation