Skip to main content
Log in

Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 January 2012

Abstract

Early stages of intervertebral disc degeneration are postulated to cause instability. In the literature, however, some authors report the opposite. These contradictory positions are probably supported by the mostly small number of segments which are investigated. The aim of this project therefore was to investigate the influence of intervertebral disc degeneration on lumbar spine rotational stability using a large data set. The flexibility data from all spine specimens tested in our institute so far were collected in a large in vitro database. From this database, all lumbar spine specimens were selected, which had been tested for flexibility under pure moment loads of ±7.5 N m and for which radiographs were accessible. 203 segments met these criteria. Their radiographic degree of disc degeneration was determined on a scale from 0 (no degeneration) to 3 (severe degeneration) and their influence on the respective range of motion and neutral zone was examined. The different lumbar levels differ in flexibility, which increases the variability of the data if pooled together. To minimise this effect a statistical model was fitted. The model-based mean estimates showed a decrease of the range of motion from grade 0 to 3 in flexion/extension (by 3.1°, p < 0.05) and lateral bending (by 3.4°, p < 0.05). In contrast, in axial rotation the range of motion tended to increase; however, not only from grade 0 to 1 but also towards grade 3 (by 0.2°) (p > 0.05). The neutral zone was affected in a similar way but to a smaller degree (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the results indicated that early stages of intervertebral disc degeneration do not necessarily cause rotational instability. In contrast, stability increased in flexion/extension and lateral bending. Only in axial rotation stability tended to decrease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA, Hutton WC (1981) The relevance of torsion to the mechanical derangement of the lumbar spine. Spine 6(3):241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31(18):2151–2161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Rawahi M, Luo J, Pollintine P, Dolan P, and Adams MA (2010) Mechanical function of vertebral body osteophytes, as revealed by experiments on cadaveric spines. Spine (Epub ahead of print)

  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, Springer, pp 60

  5. Farfan HF (1980) The pathological anatomy of degenerative spondylolisthesis. A cadaver study. Spine 5(5):412–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Farfan HF, Gracovetsky S (1984) The nature of instability. Spine 9(7):714–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, Tanaka N, Jeon CH, Andersson GB, Haughton VM (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25(23):3036–3044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Heuer F, Schmidt H, Klezl Z, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2007) Stepwise reduction of functional spinal structures increase range of motion and change lordosis angle. J Biomech 40(2):271–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ito M, Tadano S, Kaneda K (1993) A biomechanical definition of spinal segmental instability taking personal and disc level differences into account. Spine 18(15):2295–2304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kettler A, Wilke HJ (2006) Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration. Eur Spine J 15:705–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kettler A, Wilke HJ, Haid C, Claes L (2000) Effects of specimen length on the monosegmental motion behavior of the lumbar spine. Spine 25(5):543–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF (1982) Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (165):110–123

  13. Krismer M, Haid C, Behensky H, Kapfinger P, Landauer F, Rachbauer F (2000) Motion in lumbar functional spine units during side bending and axial rotation moments depending on the degree of degeneration. Spine 25(16):2020–2027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mimura M, Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Crisco JJ, Yamamoto I, Vasavada A (1994) Disc degeneration affects the multidirectional flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 19(12):1371–1380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nachemson A (1960) Lumbar intradiscal pressure. Experimental studies on post-mortem material. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 43:43

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oxland TR, Lund T, Jost B, Cripton P, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Nolte LP (1996) The relative importance of vertebral bone density and disc degeneration in spinal flexibility and interbody implant performance. An in vitro study. Spine 21(22):2558–2569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and instability hypothesis. J Spinal Disord 5(4):390–396 (discussion 397)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penning L, Wilmink JT, van Woerden HH (1984) Inability to prove instability. A critical appraisal of clinical-radiological flexion-extension studies in lumbar disc degeneration. Diagn Imaging Clin Med 53(4):186–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka N, An HS, Lim TH, Fujiwara A, Jeon CH, Haughton VM (2001) The relationship between disc degeneration and flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine J 1(1):47–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15(5):411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vernon-Roberts B, Pirie CJ (1973) Healing trabecular microfractures in the bodies of lumbar vertebrae. Ann Rheum Dis 32(5):406–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Schmitt H, Wolf S (1994) A universal spine tester for in vitro experiments with muscle force simulation. Eur Spine J 3(2):91–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: Part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 15(6):720–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao F, Pollintine P, Hole BD, Dolan P, Adams MA (2005) Discogenic origins of spinal instability. Spine 30(23):2621–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Kettler.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2160-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kettler, A., Rohlmann, F., Ring, C. et al. Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database. Eur Spine J 20, 578–584 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1635-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1635-z

Keywords

Navigation