Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population

  • Population Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considerable work has been done on disentangling important factors determining early development in body size, yet our knowledge of the extent to which animals living under varying conditions can achieve catch-up growth for a bad start in life is limited. Here, we investigated how body mass at the age of 8 months influenced adult body mass in a moose Alces alces population living under excellent environmental conditions on the island of Vega in northern Norway. We also investigated if mother age and birth date effects on calf body mass persisted until adulthood. We show that neither males nor females were able to show compensatory growth before they reached adulthood, and that part of the variation in adult body mass may have been due to variation in mother age and date of birth. The pattern observed in males can be related to their growth strategy in relation to reproduction, while such results were not expected in females where size-dependent start of reproduction is likely to interact with body growth. We suggest that the good environmental conditions experienced on Vega led to females having small somatic costs of an early start of reproduction or that larger females were able to acquire more resources for growth than their smaller conspecifics. In both cases, females that postpone their first reproduction may not be able to achieve catch-up growth for their lower early body mass compared to females that start reproduction at an early age. Our results concur with previous studies indicating that compensatory growth is weak in moose, increasing the likelihood that variation in life history characters are also transferred between generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in red deer: II. Density-independent effects and cohort variation. J Anim Ecol 56:69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Clutton-Brock TH, Langvatn R (1992) Cohort variation in reproduction and survival: implications for population demography. In: Brown RD (ed) The biology of deer, 2nd international symposium. Springer, Mississippi, pp 15–21

  • Andersen R, Sæther BE (1996) Elg i Norge. Damm NW and Son, AS. Teknologisk forlag, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DR, Burnham KP (2002) Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. J Wildl Manage 66:912–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer JJ (1987) Factors determining the onset of sexual maturity in New Zealand chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra L.). Z Säugetierkd 52:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman A, Benton TG, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (2002) Population dynamics consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends Ecol Evol 17:263–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G, Koufopanou V (1986) The cost of reproduction. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 3:83–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron P, Festa-Bianchet M, von Hardenberg A, Bassano B (2008) Heterogeneity in male horn growth and longevity in a highly sexually dimorphic ungulate. Oikos 117:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubenik GA (1998) Behavior. In: Franzmann AW, Schwartz CC (eds) Ecology and management of the North American moose. Smithsonian Institution Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé CH, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1999) Individual differences, longevity, and reproductive senescence in bighorn ewes. Ecology 80:2555–2565

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund GN, Sand HKG, Pehrson Å (1991) Body mass dynamics of moose calves in relation to winter severity. J Wildl Manage 55:675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Major M, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1987) Early development and population dynamics in red deer: I. density-dependent effect on juvenile survival. J Anim Ecol 56:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 325–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltman D, Smith JA, Bancroft D, Pilkington J, MacColl AD, Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (1999) Density-dependent variation in lifetime breeding success and natural and sexual selection in Soay rams. Am Nat 154:730–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan RL, Long TA (1962) Studies on antler growth and nutrition of white-tailed deer. In: Proceedings of the national white-tailed deer Dis. symposium, vol 1, pp 54–60

  • Crawley MJ (2002) Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson G, Wallin K, Ball JP, Broberg M (2001) Age-related reproductive effort and senescence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology 82:1613–1620

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M (1989) Individual differences, parasites, and the costs of reproduction for bighorn ewes (Ovis candensis). J Anim Ecol 58:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1998) Selfish mothers: reproductive expenditure and resource availability in bighorn ewes. Behav Ecol 9:144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Wishart WD (1994) Early weaning in bighorn sheep, Ovis canadensis, affects growth of males but not females. Behav Ecol 5:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson J (1998) Mass and density-dependent reproductive success and reproductive costs in a capital breeder. Am Nat 152:367–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT, Réale D (2000) Early development, adult mass, and reproductive success in bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol 11:633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW, Turelli L, Jorgenson JT (2004) Relative allocation to horn and body growth in bighorn rams varies with resource availability. Behav Ecol 15:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindström J, Albon SD (2001) Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol 70:721–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France J, Dijkstra J, Dhanoa MS (1996) Growth functions and their application in animal science. Ann Zootech 45:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Jullien JM (1993) Early growth and body-weight at the onset of the winter in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Mammalia 57:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Boutin JM, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Lebreton JD (1997a) Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia 112:502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Pontier D, Allaine D, Loison A, Herve JC, Heizmann A (1997b) Variation in growth form and precocity at birth in eutherian mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:859–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG (1998) Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends Ecol Evol 13:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Delorme D, Jorgenson J (2000a) Body mass and indvidual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:471–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG, Loison A, Toïgo C (2000b) Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:367–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Loison A, Toïgo C, Delorme D, Van Laere G (2003) Cohort effects and deer population dynamics. Ecoscience 10:412–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Garel M, Solberg EJ, Sæther BE, Herfindal I, Høgda KA (2006) The length of growing season and adult sex ratio affect sexual size dimorphism in moose. Ecology 87:745–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garel M, Solberg EJ, Saether BE, Grotan V, Tufto J, Heim M (in press) Age, size and spatio-temporal variation in ovulations patterns of a seasonal breeder, the Norwegian moose (Alces alces). Am Nat

  • Green WCH, Rothstein A (1991) Trade-offs between growth and reproduction in female bison. Oecologia 86:521–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard D, Barry S, Watts G, Child K (1997) Fertility of female moose (Alces alces) in relation to age and body composition. Alces 33:165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Herfindal I, Sæther BE, Solberg EJ, Andersen R, Høgda KA (2006) Population characteristics predict responses in moose body mass to temporal variation in the environment. J Anim Ecol 75:1110–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM (1996) Variation in the fecundity of roe deer in Britain: effects of age and body weight. Acta Theriol 41:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornick JL, Van Eenaeme C, Gérard O, Dufrasne I, Istasse L (2000) Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domest Anim Endocrinol 19:121–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keech MA, Boertje RD, Bowyer RT, Dale BW (1999) Effects of birth weight on growth of young moose: do low-weight neonates compensate? Alces 35:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE (1999) Early determinants of life time reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1655–1661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R (1977) Criteria for physical condition, growth and development in Cervidae: suitable for routine studies. Nordic Council for Wildlife Research, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Mysterud A, Stenseth NC, Yoccoz N (2004) Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers. Am Nat 163:763–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström J (1999) Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 14:343–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loison A, Langvatn R, Solberg EJ (1999) Body mass and winter mortality in red deer calves: disentangling sex and climate effects. Ecography 22:20–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElligott AG, Gammell MP, Harty HC, Paini DR, Murphy DT, Walsh JT, Hayden TJ (2001) Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success? Behav Ecol Sociol 49:266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miquelle DG (1990) Why don’t bull moose eat during the rut? Behav Ecol Sociol 27:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Solberg EJ, Yoccoz NG (2005) Ageing and reproductive effort in male moose under variable levels of intra-sexual competition. J Anim Ecol 74:742–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsen EB, Solberg EJ (2006) Patterns of hunting mortality in Norwegian moose (Alces alces) populations. Eur J Wildl Res 52:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Van Laere G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2002) Variation in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post E, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R, Fromentin JM (1997) Global climatic change and phenotypic variation among red deer cohorts. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1317–1324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pélabon C (1997) Is weight at birth a good predictor of weight in winter for fallow deer? J Mamm 78:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (2007) The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J Evol Biol 20:433–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsen CM, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Holmstrøm F, Solem MI, Sæther BE (2007) Accuracy and repeatability of moose (Alces alces) age as estimated from dental cement layers. Eur J Wildl Res 54:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose KE, Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE (1998) Cohort variation in male survival and lifetime breeding success in red deer. J Anim Ecol 67:979–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadleir RMFS (1969) The role of nutrition in the reproduction of wild mammals. J Reprod Fert 6(Suppl):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadleir RMFS (1987) Reproduction of female cervids. In: Wemmer CM (ed) Biology and management of Cervidae: research symposia of the national zoological park. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand H (1996) Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106:212–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand H (1998) Costs of reproduction in female moose (Alces alces) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations. Can J Zool 76:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sand H, Cederlund G, Danell K (1995) Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces). Oecologia 102:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC (1998) Reproduction, natality and growth. In: Franzmann AW, Schwartz CC (eds) Ecology and management of the North American Moose. Smithsonian Institutional Press, Washington, pp 141–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz SR, Johnson MK (1995) Effects of birth date and body-mass at birth on adult body-mass of male white-tailed deer. J Mamm 76:575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CC, Regelin WL, Franzmann AW (1987) Seasonal weights dynamics of moose. Swedish Wildlife Research 1(Suppl):301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer JD (1998) Using SAS proc mixed to fit multilevel models hierarchical models and individual growth models. J Educ Behav Stat 24:323–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1990) Density dependence in a fluctuating wild reindeer herd; maternal vs. offspring effects. Oecologia 84:442–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Sæther BE (1994) Male traits as life-history variables: annual variation in body mass and antler size in moose (Alces alces). J Mammal 75:1069–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Loison A, Sæther BE, Strand O (2000) Age-specific harvest mortality in a Norwegian moose Alces alces population. Wildl Biol 6:41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Loison A, Gaillard JM, Heim M (2004) Lasting effects of conditions at birth on moose body mass. Ecography 27:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg EJ, Heim M, Grøtan V, Sæther BE, Garel M (2007) Annual variation in maternal age and calving date generates cohort effects in moose (Alces alces) body mass. Oecologia 154:259–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (2007) SPSS 15.0.1 for Windows, USA

  • Stearns SC (1989) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. Bioscience 39:436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Buskirk SW, Hayward GD, Del Rio CM (2005) Information theory and hypothesis testing: a call for pluralism. J Appl Ecol 42:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubsjøen T, Sæther BE, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Rolandsen CM (2000) Moose (Alces alces) surival in three populations on northern Norway. Can J Zool 78:1822–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttie JM, Goodall ED, Pennie K, Kay RNB (1983) Winter food restriction and summer compensation in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). Br J Nutr 50:737–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE (1997) Environmental stochasticity and population dynamics of large herbivores: a search for mechanisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Andersen R, Hjeljord O, Heim M (1996) Ecological correlates of regional variation in life history of the moose Alces alces. Ecology 77:1493–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Haagenrud H (1983) Life history of the moose (Alces alces): fecundity rates in relation to age and carcass weight. J Mamm 64:226–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Haagenrud H (1985a) Life history of the moose Alces alces: relationship between growth and reproduction. Holarctic Ecol 8:100–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Haagenrud H (1985b) Geographical variation in body-weight and sexual size-dimorphism of Norwegian moose (Alces alces). J Zool Lond 206:93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Heim M, Solberg EJ, Jacobsen KS, Olstad R, Stacy J, Sviland M (2001) Effekter av rettet avskytning på elgbestanden på Vega. NINA-Fagrapport 049, Trondheim, Norway

  • Sæther BE, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2003) Effects of altering sex ratio structure on the demography of an isolated moose population. J Wildl Manage 67:455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Stacy JE, Jackobsen KS, Olstad R (2004) Offspring sex ratio in moose Alces alces in relation to paternal age: an experiment. Widl Biol 10:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Sæther BE, Engen S, Solberg EJ, Heim M (2007) Estimating the growth of a newly established moose population using reproductive value. Ecography 30:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa JW (1998) Compensatory response to changes in calf survivorship: management consequences of a reproductive cost in moose. Alces 34:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa JW, Adams GP (1998) Body condition and adjustments to reproductive effort in female moose (Alces alces). J Mamm 79:1345–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Gaillard JM, Michallet J (1999) Cohort affects growth of males but not females in alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex). J Mamm 80:1021–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Gaillard JM, Gauthier D, Girard I, Martinot JP, Michallet J (2002) Female reproductive success and costs in an alpine capital breeder under contarsting environments. Ecoscience 9:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

  • van Noordwijk AJ, de Jong G (1986) Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am Nat 128:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiberg V, Loe LE, Mysterud A, Langvatn R, Stenseth NC (2004) Social rank, feeding and winter weight loss in red deer: any evidence of interference competition? Oecologia 138:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veisetaune T (2003) Sommerdødelighet hos elg (Alces alces) og påfølgende endringer i elgkuas fruktbarhet langs en nord-sørgradient i Norge. Cand. Agric. oppgave, NLH

  • Verme LJ (1963) Effects of nutrients on growth of white-tailed deer fawns. Trans North Am Wildl Nat Res Conf 20:431–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Verme LJ, Ozoga JJ (1987) Relationship of photoperiod to puberty in doe fawn white-tailed deer. J Mamm 68:107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin K, Cederlund G, Pehrson A (1996) Predicting body mass from chest circumference in moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biol 2:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Weladji RB, Gaillard JM, Yoccoz NG, Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Loison A, Nieminen M, Stenseth NC (2006) Good reindeer mothers live longer and become better in raising offspring. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1239–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson PN, Osborn DF (1960) Compensatory growth after under-nutrition in mammals and birds. Biol Rev 35:324–361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Directorate for Nature Management, the County Governor in Nordland County and the Research Council of Norway (programme ‘Landskap i endring’) for financial support and the European Commission for the Marie Curie Training Site Fellowship granted to M. Garel (ENDOCLIMA). Thanks also to T. Bø, J. Arnemo, Ø. Os., B. Aleksandersen and O.A. Davidsen for all support and help in the field. We gratefully acknowledge IN2P3 for providing computer resources. Manipulations described in this study comply with the current laws adopted by the Norwegian government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta 2, 7485, Trondheim, Norway

    Erling J. Solberg & Morten Heim

  2. Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, UMR 5558, Université Lyon 1, 69622, Villeurbanne, France

    Mathieu Garel

  3. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, Centre National d’Étude et de Recherche Appliquée sur la Faune de Montagne, 95 rue Pierre Flourens, BP 74267, 32098, Montpellier, Cedex 05, France

    Mathieu Garel

  4. Centre for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Vidar Grøtan & Bernt-Erik Sæther

Authors
  1. Erling J. Solberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mathieu Garel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Morten Heim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vidar Grøtan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernt-Erik Sæther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erling J. Solberg.

Additional information

Communicated by Janne Sundell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solberg, E.J., Garel, M., Heim, M. et al. Lack of compensatory body growth in a high performance moose Alces alces population. Oecologia 158, 485–498 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1158-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1158-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation