Skip to main content
Log in

Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I examined the relationship between age, body size and fecundity in 833 female moose (Alces alces) from 14 populations in Sweden sampled during 1989–1992. Data on population density, food availability and climatic conditions were also collected for each population. Age and body mass were both significantly positively related to fecundity, measured as ovulation rate, among female moose. The relationship between the probability of ovulation and body mass was dependent on age with (1) a higher body mass needed in younger females for attaining a given fecundity, and (2) body mass having a stronger effect on fecundity in yearling (1.5 year) than in older (≥2.5 year) females. Thus, a 40 kg increase in yearling body mass resulted in a 42% increase in the probability of ovulation as compared to a 6% increase in older females. The lower reproductive effort per unit body mass, and the relatively stronger association between fecundity and body mass in young female moose compared to older ones, is likely to primarily represent a mechanism that trades off early maturation against further growth, indicating a higher cost of reproduction in young animals. In addition to age and body mass, population identity explained a significant amount of the individual variation in fecundity, showing that the relationship between body mass and fecundity was variable among populations. This variation was in turn related to the environment, in terms of climatic conditions forcing female moose living in relatively harsh/more seasonal climatic conditions to attain a 22% higher body mass to achive the same probability of multiple ovulation (twinning) as females living in climatically milder/less seasonal environments. The results suggests that the lower fecundity per unit body mass in female moose living in climatically harsh/more seasonal environments may be an adaptive response to lower rates of juvenile survival, compared to females experiencing relatively milder/less seasonal climatic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northeastern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn 5:169–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Langvatn R (1992) Plant phenology and the benefit of migration in a temperate ungulate. Oikos 65:502–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Mitchell B, Staines BW (1983) Fertility and body weight in female red deer: a density-dependent relationship. J Anim Ecol 52:969–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Albon SD, Mitchell B, Huby BJ, Brown D (1986) Fertility in female red deer (Cervus elaphus): the effect of body composition, age and reproductive status. J Zool Lond 209:447–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J (1993) Determinants of maturation in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 8:166–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1978) Climatic variability and body size variation in the muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) of North America. Oecologia 36:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1979) Seasonality and patterns of natural selection for life histories. Am Nat 114:569–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1988) Evolution of life histories of mammals-theory and pattern. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron GN, McClure PA (1988) Body size patterns in North American mammal faunas. In: Boyce MS (ed) Evolution of Life histories of Mammals, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 33–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1989) Matrix population models. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederlund G, Sand H, Pehrson Å (1991) Body mass dynamics of moose calves in relation to winter severity. J Wildl Manage 55:675–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Monographs in behavior and ecology. Princenton University Press, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD (1989) Red deer in the Highlands. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FF (1988) Reproductive, success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Engen S, Saether B-E (1994) Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction. Theor Popul Biol 46:232–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M, Bossert W (1970) Life history consequences of natural selection. Am Nat 104:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard J-M, Sempéré AJ, Boutin J-M, Laere GV, Boisaubert B (1992) Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Can J Zool 70:1541–1545

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist V (1987) Bergmann's rule is invalid. Can J Zool 65:1035–1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosemer DW, Lenenshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1965) The ecology of deer range in Alaska. Ecol Monogr 35:259–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1970) Tudra ranges north of the Boreal Forest. J Range Manage 23:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DR (1985) Population ecology: the interaction between deer and their food supply. In: The biology of deer production. R Soc NZ Bull 22:13–22

  • Kozlowski J, Uchmanski J (1987) Optimal individual growth and reproduction in perennial species with indeterminate growth. Evol Ecol 1:214–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanestedt G, Pederssen PH, Nordhuus I, Jaren V, Anderssen JE, Saether B-E (1988) A population model for moose management. Part 1–2 CERSIM-evaluated (in Norwegian). Directory for Nature Management, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Albon SD (1986) Geographic clines in body weight of Norwegian red deer: a novel explanation of Bergmann's rule? Holarct Ecol 9:285–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvatn R, Albon SD, Burkey T, Clutton-Brock TH (1994) Climate, plant phenology, and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. In: R Langvatn (PhD thesis) Climate-associated variation in the resource base for red deer (Cervus elaphus)-relationships to body size and reproductive per formance within and between cohorts. University of Oslo, Oslo

  • Law R (1979) Optimal life histories under age-specific predation. Am Nat 114:399–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenvik D, Granefjell O, Tamnes J (1982) Calf mortality in a new perspective. (in Norwegian). Scandinavian Reindeer Meeting, Hemavan 1981 (supplement to Rangifer), pp 1–82

  • Markgren G (1969) Reproduction of moose in Sweden. Swed Wildl 6:127–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech LD, Nelson ME, McRoberts RE (1991) Effects of maternal and grandmaternal nutrition on deer mass and vulnerability to wolf predation. J Mammal 72:146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Michod ED (1970) Evolution of life histories in response to age specific mortality factors. Am Nat 113:531–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianha ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 104:592–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter WP, McClure PA (1984) Climate effects on growth and reproduction potential in (Sigmodon hispidus) and (Peromyscus maniculatus.) In: JF Merrit (ed) Winter ecology of small mammals. Special Publication of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 10, Pittsburgh

  • Reimers E (1983) Reproduction in wild reindeer in Norway. Can J Zool 61:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley H, Skjelvåg AO (eds) (1984) The impact of grass production and quality. Proceedings of the 10th general meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Ås, Norway

  • Roff DA (1988) The evolution of migration and some life history parameters in marine fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 22:133–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analyses. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadleir RMFS (1969) The ecology of reproduction in wild and domestic animals. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E, Hagenrud H (1983) Life history of the moose Alces alces: fecundity rates in relation to age and carcass weight. J Mammal 64:226–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E, Hagenrud H (1985) Life history of the moose Alces alces: relationship between growth and reproduction. Holarct Ecol 8:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand H, Cederlund G, Danell K (1995) Geographical and latitudinal variation in growth patterns and adult body size of Swedish moose (Alces alces). Oecologia 102:433–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM (1974) Selection for optimal life histories: the effects of age structure. Ecology 55:291–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MR, Boutin S (1993) Muskrat life history: a comparsion of a northern and southern population. Ecography 16:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1984) The effect of food and maternal condition on fetal growth and size in wild reindeer. Rangifer 4:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogland T (1989) Natural selection of wild reindeer life history traits by food limitation and predation. Oikos 95:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Skunke F (1949) The moose-studies, harvest and management (in Swedish). Nordstedts, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC, Koella JC (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life history traits: predictions from norms of reaction for age- and size-at-maturity. Evolution 40:893–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1988) Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensk Nationalatlas (1992a) Swedish National Atlas (in Swedish). Agriculture, SNA

  • Svensk Nationalatlas (1992b) Swedish National Atlas (in Swedish). Forestry, SNA.

  • Van Soest PJ (1983) Nutritional quality of the ruminant, 2nd edn. O and B Books, Corwallis, Ore

    Google Scholar 

  • White RG (1983) Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulates. Oikos 40:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction and refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sand, H. Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106, 212–220 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328601

Key words

Navigation