Skip to main content
Log in

Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The function of bird song is closely linked to sexual selection through female choice and male–male competition, and thus variation in communication success is likely to have major fitness consequences for a singing male. A crucial constraint on signal transmission is imposed by background noise, which may include songs from other species. I investigated whether singing nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) avoid temporal overlap with the songs of other bird species in a playback experiment. I analysed the temporal song patterns of six males, each of which were exposed to songs of other species. The nightingales significantly avoided overlapping their songs with the playback songs, and started singing preferentially during the silent intervals between the heterospecific songs. This timing of song onset produced a greater variability in pause duration compared to the nightingales’ undisturbed solo singing. These findings suggest that birds adjust their song timing to avoid acoustic interference on short temporal scales, and thus are able to improve the efficiency of acoustic communication in complex sonic environments. Moreover, the results indicate that temporal song patterns can be affected by the songs of other species, and thus such influences should be taken into account when studying bird song in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brumm H (2004) The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. J Anim Ecol 73:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Hultsch H (2001) Pattern amplitude is related to pattern imitation during the song development of nightingales. Anim Behav 61:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Behav 35:151–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Slater PJB (2006) Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumm H, Todt D (2004) Male–male vocal interactions and the adjustment of song amplitude in a territorial bird. Anim Behav 67:281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole CK, Slater PJB (1995) Bird song: biological themes and variations. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody ML, Brown JH (1969) Song asynchrony in neighbouring bird species. Nature 222:778–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ficken RW, Ficken MS, Hailman JP (1974) Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science 183:762–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ficken RW, Popp JW, Matthiae PE (1985) Avoidance of acoustic interference by Ovenbirds. Wilson Bull 97:569–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Geberzahn N, Hultsch H (2003) Long-time storage of song types in birds: evidence from interactive playbacks. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1085–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Gochfeld M (1978) Intraspecific social stimulation and temporal displacement of song of the lesser sky lark Alauda gugula. Z Tierpsychol 48:337–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafe TU (1996) The function of call alternation in the African reed frog (Hyperolius marmoratus): precise call timing prevents auditory masking. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (1988) Interspecific acoustic interactions among katydids Neoconocephalus: inhibition-induced shifts in diel periodicity. Anim Behav 36:684–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield MD (2005) Mechanisms and evolution of communal sexual displays in arthropods and anurans. Adv Study Behav 35:1–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultsch H, Todt D (1982) Temporal performance roles during vocal interactions in nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klump GM (1996) Bird communication in the noisy world. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 321–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn MJ, Martin AA (1969) Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodyctylid frogs. Anim Behav 17:785–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib M, Kipper S (2006) Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planck RJ, McLaren G, Konishi M (1975) Temporal pattern shifts in singing birds: a critique. Science 190:292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW, Ficken RW (1987) Effects of non-specific singing on the song of the ovenbird. Bird Behav 7:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp JW, Ficken RW, Reinartz JA (1985) Short-term temporal avoidance of interspecific acoustic interference among forest birds. Auk 102:744–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer H, Bailey W, Dadour I (1989) Insect hearing in the field. III. Masking by noise. J Comp Physiol A 164:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder DJ, Wiley RH (1983) Communication with shared song themes in tufted titmice. Auk 100:414–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JJ (1987) The function of call alternation in anuran amphibians: a test of three hypotheses. Evolution 41:461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983) An experimental study of the acoustic interference between two species of neotropical treefrogs. Anim Behav 31:891–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todt D, Hultsch H (1998) Hierarchical learning, development and representation of song. In: Balda RP, Pepperberg IM, Kamil AC (eds) Animal cognition in nature. Academic, San Diego, pp 275–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Todt D, Naguib M (2000) Vocal interactions in birds: the use of song as a model in communication. Adv Study Behav 29:247–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassermann FE (1977) Intraspecific acoustical interference in the white-throated sparrow Zonotrichia albicollis. Anim Behav 25:949–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelick R, Narins PM (1982) Analysis of acoustically evoked call suppression behaviour in a neotropical treefrog. Anim Behav 30:728–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelick R, Narins PM (1983) Intensity discrimination and the precision of call timing in two species of neotropical treefrogs. J Comp Physiol A 153:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelick R, Narins PM (1985) Characterization of the advertisement call oscillator in the frog Elutherodactylus coqui. J Comp Physiol A 156:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Several students and members of staff of the Behavioural Biology Group at the Freie Universität Berlin provided skilful help with the handrearing. The research group was generally supervised by Dietmar Todt and Henrike Hultsch, and funding was provided by the German Research Foundation (award To 13/30-1). Many thanks are due to Tina Sommer and Christoph Lange, who shared their song recordings with me, and to Nigel Mann for the nightingale drawing used in Fig. 2. Furthermore, I am most grateful to Luke Rendell for coding the randomisation tests. He, Peter Slater, and two anonymous referees gave helpful comments on the manuscript which were much appreciated. While analysing the data and writing the manuscript I was supported by an Emmy Noether fellowship from the German Research Foundation (award Br 2309/2-1). The experiments described in this study comply with the “Principles of animal care”, publication No. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institute of Health, and also with the current laws of the Federal Republic of Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Brumm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumm, H. Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A 192, 1279–1285 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0158-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0158-x

Keywords

Navigation