Abstract
Purpose
To determine the accuracy and radiation dose reduction of a limited abdominopelvic CT from the bottom of T10 to the top of the pubic symphysis in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
Methods
We performed a HIPAA compliant and IRB-approved retrospective study of adult patients who underwent CT abdomen/pelvis for suspected appendicitis. The Z-axis length and whole body effective doses of the original full scan and theoretical limited scan from the bottom of T10 to the top of the pubic symphysis were recorded. Images were reviewed to determine if the appendix or entire cecum would be visualized and if any cases of appendicitis or alternative diagnoses would be missed with the limited scan.
Results
235 patients (89 male, mean age 44.6 years) were included. The limited scan resulted in a mean Z-axis length reduction of 5.1 cm superiorly, 6.1 cm inferiorly, and a total reduction of 11.2 cm (24%). The mean whole body effective dose was 11.8 and 9.1 mSv for the original and limited scans, respectively (23% reduction). The entire appendix or cecum was visualized in all cases. Appendicitis was present in 24 cases and an alternative diagnosis was made in 75. No cases of appendicitis or alternative diagnoses were missed using the limited scan.
Conclusions
A limited range CT from the bottom of T10 to the top of the pubic symphysis is as accurate as full abdominopelvic CT in evaluating patients with suspected acute appendicitis and results in approximately 23% dose reduction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith MP KD, Rosen MP et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain—suspected appendicitis. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/RightLowerQuadrantPainSuspectedAppendicitis.pdf 1 Apr 2014
Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, et al. (2002) Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1319–1325
Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ (2011) Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann Intern Med 154:789–796 (W-291)
Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ (2012) Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiology 265:733–742
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146
Krajewski S, Brown J, Phang PT, Raval M, Brown CJ (2011) Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg 54:43–53
Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al. (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. (2012) Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 366:1596–1605
Kim SY, Lee KH, Kim K, et al. (2011) Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis. Radiology 260:437–445
Seo H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, et al. (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:96–105
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144
Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB (2001) Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 220:691–695
Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF (1993) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis—value of unenhanced Ct. Am J Roentgenol 160:763–766
Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 217:159–163
de Leon AD, Xi Y, Champine J, Costa DN (2014) Achieving ideal computed tomographic scan length in patient with suspected urolithiasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:264–267
Corwin MT, Bekele W, Lamba R (2014) Bony landmarks on computed tomographic localizer radiographs to prescribe a reduced scan range in patients undergoing multidetector computed tomography for suspected urolithiasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 38:404–407
ICRP 2007 The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. In: ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37 (2–4)
Federle MP (1997) Focused appendix CT technique: a commentary. Radiology 202:20–21
Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corwin, M.T., Chang, M., Fananapazir, G. et al. Accuracy and radiation dose reduction of a limited abdominopelvic CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 40, 1177–1182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0280-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0280-0