Skip to main content
Log in

Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers

  • Experimental Study
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the variability of the microfracture technique when performed by experienced knee arthroscopy surgeons.

Method

Four surgeons were each asked to perform microfracture on six preformed cartilage defects in fresh human cadaveric knees. Surgeons were instructed on penetration depth, inter-hole distance, and to place the holes perpendicular to the subchondral surface. Micro-computed tomography was used to calculate depth error, inter-hole distance error, and deviation of penetration angles from the perpendicular.

Results

All surgeons misjudged depth and inter-hole distance, tending to make microfracture holes too deep (depth error 1.1 mm ± 1.9) and too close together (inter-hole distance error: −0.8 mm ± 0.4). Fifty-one per cent of holes were angled more than 10° from the perpendicular (range 2.6°–19.8°). Both depth and distance errors were significantly lower in the trochlear groove than on the femoral condyle (p < 0.05). Surface shearing was associated with both penetration depth >4 mm and angles >20°. Inter-hole infraction occurred in holes closer than 2.5 mm to each other.

Conclusion

Even experienced knee arthroscopy surgeons demonstrate inconsistency in surgical technique when performing microfracture. While further research will be required to demonstrate that these variations in surgical technique are associated with poorer clinical outcomes after microfracture, surgeons should attempt to minimizing such variations in order to prevent surface shearing and inter-hole infraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basad E, Ishaque B, Bachmann G, Sturz H, Steinmeyer J (2010) Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:519–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen H, Hoemann CD, Sun J, Chevrier A, McKee MD, Shive MS, Hurtig M, Buschmann MD (2011) Depth of subchondral perforation influences the outcome of bone marrow stimulation cartilage repair. J Orthop Res 29:1178–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fazalare JA, Griesser MJ, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2010) The use of continuous passive motion following knee cartilage defect surgery: a systematic review. Orthopedics 33:878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris JD, Brophy RH, Siston RA, Flanigan DC (2010) Treatment of chondral defects in the athlete’s knee. Arthroscopy 26:841–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim I, Paik KS, Lee SP (2007) Quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of micro-computed tomography in tooth measurement. Clin Anat 20:27–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knapik DM, Harris JD, Pangrazzi G, Griesser MJ, Siston RA, Agarwal S, Flanigan DC (2013) The basic science of continuous passive motion in promoting knee health: a systematic review of studies in a rabbit model. Arthroscopy 29:1722–1731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grontvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, Roberts S, Solheim E, Strand T, Johansen O (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2105–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Solheim E, Strand T, Roberts S, Isaksen V, Johansen O (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kreuz PC, Erggelet C, Steinwachs MR, Krause SJ, Lahm A, Niemeyer P, Ghanem N, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Is microfracture of chondral defects in the knee associated with different results in patients aged 40 years or younger? Arthroscopy 22:1180–1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs MR, Erggelet C, Krause SJ, Konrad G, Uhl M, Sudkamp N (2006) Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:1119–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marder RA, Hopkins G Jr, Timmerman LA (2005) Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments. Arthroscopy 21:152–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Massey ND, Galil KA, Wilson TD (2013) Determining position of the inferior alveolar nerve via anatomical dissection and micro-computed tomography in preparation for dental implants. J Can Dent Assoc 79:d39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2053–2063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, Potter HG, Spock CR, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2005) The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1911–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2006) High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: a prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique. Am J Sports Med 34:1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman JR, Silliman JF, Fulstone HA (1994) Improvement of full-thickness chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg 7:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  17. Safran MR, Seiber K (2010) The evidence for surgical repair of articular cartilage in the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saris D, Price A, Widuchowski W, Bertrand-Marchand M, Caron J, Drogset JO, Emans P, Podskubka A, Tsuchida A, Kili S, Levine D, Brittberg M (2014) Matrix-applied characterized autologous cultured chondrocytes versus microfracture: two-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Sports Med 42:1384–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanish WD, McCormack R, Forriol F, Mohtadi N, Pelet S, Desnoyers J, Restrepo A, Shive MS (2013) Novel scaffold-based BST-CarGel treatment results in superior cartilage repair compared with microfracture in a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1640–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ (2001) Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S362–S369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Theodoropoulos J, Dwyer T, Whelan D, Marks P, Hurtig M, Sharma P (2012) Microfracture for knee chondral defects: a survey of surgical practice among Canadian orthopedic surgeons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2430–2437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Theodoropoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kroell, A., Marks, P., Chahal, J. et al. Microfracture for chondral defects: assessment of the variability of surgical technique in cadavers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2374–2379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3481-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3481-8

Keywords

Navigation