Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating inestimable standard errors in population pharmacokinetic studies: The bootstrap with winsorization

  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A simulation study was performed to determine how inestimable standard errors could be obtained when population pharmacokinetic analysis is performed with the NONMEM software on data from small sample size phase I studies. Plausible sets of concentration — time data for nineteen subjects were simulated using an incomplete longitudinal population pharmacokinetic study design, and parameters of a drug in development that exhibits two compartment linear pharmacokinetics with single dose first order input. They were analyzed with the NONMEM program. Standard errors for model parameters were computed from the simulated parameter values to serve as true standard errors of estimates. The nonparametric bootstrap approach was used to generate replicate data sets from the simulated data and analyzed with NONMEM. Because of the sensitivity of the bootstrap to extreme values, winsorization was applied to parameter estimates. Winsorized mean parameters and their standard errors were computed and compared with their true values as well as the non-winsorized estimates. Percent bias was used to judge the performance of the bootstrap approach (with or without winsorization) in estimating inestimable standard errors of population pharmacokinetic parameters. Winsorized standard error estimates were generally more accurate than non-winsorized estimates because the distribution of most parameter estimates were skewed, sometimes with heavy tails. Using the bootstrap approach combined with winsorization, inestimable robust standard errors can be obtained for NONMEM estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters with ≥150 bootstrap replicates. This approach was also applied to a real data set and a similar outcome was obtained. This investigation provides a structural framework for estimating inestimable standard errors when NONMEM is used for population pharmacokinetic modeling involving small sample sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes DC. Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. 3rd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sheiner LB, Rosenberg B, Marathe VV. Estimation of the population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1977; 5: 445–479 (1977)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidian M, Giltinan, DM. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 1990; 46: 673–687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vonesh EF, Carter RL. Mixed-effects nonlinear regression for unbalanced repeated measures. Biometrics 1992; 48: 1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schoemaker RC, Cohen AF. Estimating impossible curves with NONMEM. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1996; 42: 283–290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 1979; 7: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Efron B, Tibshirani R: Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1986; 1: 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Efron B: How biased is the apparent error rate of a prediction rule? J Am Stat Assoc 1986; 81: 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ette EI. Population model stability and performance. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 486–495.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ette EI. Comparing non-hierarchical models: application to nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Computers Biol Med 1996; 26: 505–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones CD, Sun H, Ette EI. Designing cross-sectional pharmacokinetic studies: implications for pediatric and animal studies. Clin Res Regul Affairs 1996; 13 (3&4): 133–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zintzaras E, Bouka P, Kowald A. Biometrical evaluation of bioequivalence trials using a bootstrap individual direct curve comparison method. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2002; 27: 11–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickel P, Freedman DA. Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Ann Stat 1981; 9: 1196–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bickel P, Freedman DA. Asymptotic normality and the bootstrap in stratified sampling. Ann Stat 1984; 12: 470–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fadiran EO, Jones CD, Ette EI. Designing population pharmacokinetic studies: performance of mixed designs. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2000; 25: 231–239.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beal Sl, Sheiner LB (eds). NONMEM Users Guides, NONMEM Project Group, San Francisco, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilcox RR. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. New York: Academic Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bickel PJ, Lehmann EL. Descriptive statistics for nonparametric models II. Location. Ann Stat 1975; 3: 1045–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ette EI, Ludden TM. Population pharmacokinetic modeling: the importance of informative graphics. Pharm Res 1995; 12 (12): 1845–1855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ette EI, Williams P, Sun H, et al. The Process of knowledge discovery from large pharmacokinetic data sets. J Clin Pharmacol 2001 (1); 41: 25–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ene I. Ette Ph.D., FCCP, FCP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ette, E.I., Onyiah, L.C. Estimating inestimable standard errors in population pharmacokinetic studies: The bootstrap with winsorization. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 213–224 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190460

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190460

Keywords

Navigation