Skip to main content
Log in

Rework solution method on large size radial roller bearings

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose and verify a new rework solution method on large size radial roller bearing. Bearing rework is developing rapidly owing to cost control and greenhouse effect. General rework procedures and rules are evaluated by relative files and executed by most famous bearing suppliers. All defective rolling elements are scrapped according to the existing rework solutions, which leads to tremendous wastage. We draw our attention to the possibility of reusing large size rollers. In the procedure, rolling contact fatigue characteristic of roller bearings is analyzed and the solution method by reusing large size rollers is obtained in the paper. In view of greatly changing the rollers, rolling bearing design method is involved in the new solution method. This is significantly different from the old methods. In addition, the rating life of reworked bearing is re-calculated for reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

σ max :

Maximum stress, used in fatigue criterion, in newtons per square millimeter

σ :

(Real) stress, used in fatigue criterion, in newtons per square millimeter

P r :

Dynamic equivalent radial load, in newtons

b :

Semi-minor axis of the projected contact ellipse, in millimeter

L we :

Effective roller contact length, in millimeter

z :

Principal direction distance, in millimeter

∑ρ :

Curvature sum, in millimeter

X :

Tangential (over-rolling) direction

Y :

Axial (lateral) direction

Z :

Radial (depth) direction

τ :

Shear stress, in newtons per square millimeter

k 1 :

Variable related to the specific shearing stress

Q max :

Maximum Hertz stress, in newtons per square millimeter

τ x :

(Real) stress refers to X direction, in newtons per square millimeter

τ y :

(Real) stress refers to Y direction, in newtons per square millimeter

τ z :

(real) stress refers to Z direction, in newtons per square millimeter

τ 45 :

Maximum shear stress, in newtons per square millimeter

τ max :

Maximum shear stress, in newtons per square millimeter

σ e v.Mises :

Resulting v. Mises equivalent stress, in newtons per square millimeter

z :

Depth along Z axis at x = 0, y = 0, in millimeter

z max :

Depth to maximum shear stress at x = 0, y = 0, in millimeter

k 2 :

Variable related to the maximum shearing stresses

V :

Stressed volume, m3, (in.3)

Vz :

Stressed volume removed by honing or grinding, m3, (in.3)

V  z :

Remaining stressed volume after honing or grinding, m3, (in.3)

L t :

Race track length, in millimeter

D e :

Raceway diameter of out ring, in millimeter

d i :

Raceway diameter of out ring, in millimeter

D pw :

Pitch diameter of ball or roller set, in millimeters

D we :

Roller diameter applicable in the calculation of load ratings, in millimeters

W :

Number of rollers per bearing row, in piece

G r :

Radial clearance, in millimeter

E :

Circumscribed circle diameter of cylindrical roller bearing, in millimeter

F :

Inscribed circle diameter of cylindrical roller bearing, in millimeter

C 0r :

Basic static radial load rating, in newtons

i :

Number of bearing rows within the assembly, in piece

α :

Bearing half-included outer race angle, in degree

C r :

Basic dynamic radial load rating, in newtons

b m :

Rating factor for contemporary, commonly used, high-quality hardened bearing steel in accordance with good manufacturing practices, the value of which varies with bearing type and design

f c :

Factor, which depends on the geometry of the bearing components, the accuracy to which the various components are made, and the material

C r :

Modified dynamic radial load rating, in newtons

S :

Reliability (probability of survival), in percent

N :

Life, number of stress cycles

L :

Life, number of stress cycles/hours, in millions of revolutions/hours

L 10 :

Basic life with 10 % failure probability (90 % survival), in millions of revolutions

a 1 :

Life modification factor for reliability

a 2 :

Adjustment factor for bearing materials and processing

a 3 :

Adjustment factor for bearing operating conditions including operating profile/mission

a 23 :

Adjustment factor for bearing including interrelationship of material and lubrication effects

L z :

Life of stressed volumes, in number of stress cycles/hours

L 1 − z :

Life of unstressed volumes, in number of stress cycles/hours

L or :

Life of the outer raceway, in hours

L ir :

Life of the inner raceway, in hours

L re :

Life of the rolling element set, in hours

References

  1. SKF (1994) Bearing failures and their causes. Publication—PI 401 E, Sweden: SKF 1994

  2. FAG (2005), “Rolling bearing failure analysis.” Publication—FAG Australia Pty Ltd, Australia: FAG 2005

  3. Hanau H (1976) Restoration by grinding of aircraft ball and roller bearings. In: a manufacturer’s viewpoint,” bearing restoration by grinding, H. Hanau, et al., eds., USAAVSCOM-TR-76-27, U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command, pp 1–23

  4. Bull HL (1976) “Bearing restoration—A users viewpoint,” In: Bearing restoration by grinding, H. Hanau, etal., eds., USAAVS COM -TR-76-27, U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command, pp 59–66

  5. Parker RJ, Zaretsky EV, Chen SM (1976) “Evaluation of ball and roller bearings restored by grinding,” In: Bearing restoration by grinding, H. Hanau, et al., eds., USAAVSCOM-TR-76-27, U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command, pp 24–42

  6. Coy JJ, Zaretsky EV, Cowgill GR (1977) Fatigue life analysis of restored and refurbished bearings, NASA TN D-8486

  7. Zaretsky EV (1987) “Effects of surface removal on rolling-element fatigue,” NASA TM–88871

  8. Zaretsky EV, Branzai EV (2005) “Effect of rolling bearing refurbishment and restoration on bearing life and reliability,” NASA TM-2005-212966

  9. Zaretsky EV, Branzai EV (2007) NASA TP-2007-214463, model specification for rework of aircraft engine, poser transmission, and accessory/auxillary ball and roller bearings”

  10. Zaretsky EV (2012) “Rolling bearing steels—a technical and historical perspective” NASA TM 2012-217445

  11. SKF (2012) The benefits of remanufacturing rolling bearings. SKF Evolution, Sweden

  12. Schaeffler (2014) Repair and reconditioning of rolling bearings. Schaeffler, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alexander J (2008) Bearing repair provides valuable alternative to bearing replacement for heavy industries PTE, pp 43–47

  14. Voskamp AP (1998) Fatigue and material response in rolling contact, bearing steels: into the 20th Century. ASTM STP 1328:152–166

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forster NH, Ogden WP, Trivedi HK (2008) “On the rolling contact fatigue life and spall propagation characteristics of M50, M50 NiL and 52100 bearing materials: Part III—metallurgical examination”, to be presented at the STLE annual meeting, May 18–22, 2008. STLE annual meeting, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harris TA (2006) Rolling bearing analysis. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hooke CJ (2003) Dynamic effects in EHL contacts. In: Tribological Research and Design for Engineering Systems, Dowson D, Lubrecht AA, Priest M (Eds.), Tribology Series, Vol. 41, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 69–78, Proceedings of the 29th Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Leeds, Great Britain, September 03-06, 2002

  18. Gegner J (2011) Tribological aspects of rolling bearing failures, tribology—lubricants and lubrication, Dr. Chang-Hung Kuo (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-371-2, InTech, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/tribology-lubricants-and-lubrication/tribological-aspects-of-rolling-bearingfailures. Accessed Sept 2011

  19. Zaretsky EV, Parker RJ, Reichard DW (1966) Bearing life and failure distribution as affected by actual component differential hardness NASA TN D-3101. Lewis Research center, Cleveland, Ohio

  20. Zaretsky EV, Poplawski JV, Peters SM (1996) Comparison of life theories for rolling element bearings. Tribol Trans 39(2):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundberg G, Palmgren A (1947) Dynamic capacity of rolling bearings. Acta Polytech Mech Eng Sci 7(3):1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51475144) and the Foundation of Innovation and Research Team of Science and Technology in Universities in Henan Province (Grant No. 13IRTSTHN025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Long Chen.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Fernando Antonio Forcellini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Xia, XT., Zheng, Ht. et al. Rework solution method on large size radial roller bearings. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 1249–1260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0364-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0364-y

Keywords

Navigation