Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Measures of Foods and Nutrients in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

  • Prenatal, Neonatal, and Maternal Nutrition (DK Tobias and M-F Hivert, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Nutrition Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to provide a critical appraisal of evidence on the validity and reliability of self-reported measures of foods and nutrients in pregnancy. PubMed and EMBASE databases were investigated, and 54 studies were included. Food-frequency questionnaires had acceptable evidence of validity compared with biomarkers (\( \overset{-}{r} \)between 0.04 and 0.58; k = 19), 24-hour recall (\( \overset{-}{r} \)between 0.12 and 0.63; k = 11), and food records (\( \overset{-}{r} \)between 0.28 and 0.65; k = 12). Dietary history (\( \overset{-}{r} \)between 0.07 and 0.47; k = 7) and food records (\( \overset{-}{r} \)between 0.25 and 0.53; k = 7) had acceptable evidence of validity compared with biomarkers. Twenty-four-hour recall had poor evidence of validity against biomarkers. Evidence on reliability was good for food-frequency questionnaires, acceptable for dietary history, and inconclusive for 24-hour recall. The results suggest that food-frequency questionnaires and food records have the strongest evidence of validity in assessing nutrition during pregnancy, and further studies are needed to validate 24-hour recall and dietary history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fowles ER, Fowles SL. Healthy eating during pregnancy: determinants and supportive strategies. J Community Health Nurs. 2008;25(3):138–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Tinker LF, Huang Y, et al. Factors relating to eating style, social desirability, body image and eating meals at home increase the precision of calibration equations correcting self-report measures of diet using recovery biomarkers: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative. Nutr J. 2013;12:63.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr. 1994;72(4):619–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Block G. A review of validations of dietary assessment methods. Am J Epidemiol. 1982;115(4):492–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee-Han H, McGuire V, Boyd NF. A review of the methods used by studies of dietary measurement. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(3):269–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires – a review. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(4):567–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Molag ML, de Vries JH, Ocke MC, et al. Design characteristics of food frequency questionnaires in relation to their validity. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(12):1468–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poslusna K, Ruprich J, de Vries JH, Jakubikova M, van’t Veer P. Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice. Br J Nutr. 2009;101 Suppl 2:S73–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortiz-Andrellucchi A, Doreste-Alonso J, Henriquez-Sanchez P, Cetin I, Serra-Majem L. Dietary assessment methods for micronutrient intake in pregnant women: a systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2009;102 Suppl 1:S64–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moran VH, Skinner AL, Medina MW, et al. The relationship between zinc intake and serum/plasma zinc concentration in pregnant and lactating women: a systematic review with dose–response meta-analyses. J Trace Elem Med Biol Organ Soc Miner Trace Elem (GMS). 2012;26(2–3):74–9. This systematic review reports evidence on the relationship between zinc intake and serum/plasma zinc concentration in pregnant and lactating women.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogan TP. Psychological testing: a practical introduction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goodwin LD, Leech NL. The meaning of validity in the new standards for educational and psychological testing: implications for measurement courses. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2003;36(3):181–91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Educational Research Association. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowen DJ. Taste and food preference changes across the course of pregnancy. Appetite. 1992;19(3):233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sierles FS. How to do research with self-administered surveys. Acad Psychiatry J Am Assoc Dir Psychiatr Resid Train Assoc Acad Psychiatry. 2003;27(2):104–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):751–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4 Suppl):1220S–8. discussion 1229S–1231S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diener MJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Weinberger J. A primer on meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: the relationship between patient-reported therapeutic alliance and adult attachment style as an illustration. Psychother Res J Soc Psychother Res. 2009;19(4–5):519–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Field AP. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychol Methods. 2001;6(2):161–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fermanian J. Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984;32(6):408–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269, W264.

  25. Abramson JH, Slome C, Kosovsky C. Food frequency interview as an epidemiological tool. Am J Public Health. 1963;53:1093–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Al MD, Badart-Smook A, von Houwelingen AC, Hasaart TH, Hornstra G. Fat intake of women during normal pregnancy: relationship with maternal and neonatal essential fatty acid status. J Am Coll Nutr. 1996;15(1):49–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson DM, Hollis BW, LeVine BR, Pittard 3rd WB. Dietary assessment of maternal vitamin D intake and correlation with maternal and neonatal serum vitamin D concentrations at delivery. J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinatal Assoc. 1988;8(1):46–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baddour SE, Virasith H, Vanstone C, et al. Validity of the Willett food frequency questionnaire in assessing the iron intake of French-Canadian pregnant women. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2013;29(5):752–6. This paper reports evidence of validity for a food-frequency questionnaire among pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baer HJ, Blum RE, Rockett HR, et al. Use of a food frequency questionnaire in American Indian and Caucasian pregnant women: a validation study. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:135.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barbieri P, Nishimura RY, Crivellenti LC, Sartorelli DS. Relative validation of a quantitative FFQ for use in Brazilian pregnant women. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(8):1419–26. This paper reports evidence of validity for a food-frequency questionnaire among Brazilian pregnant women.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bosco JLF, Tseng M, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Bunin GR. Reproducibility of reported nutrient intake and supplement use during a past pregnancy: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowering J, Lowenberg RL, Morrison MA. Nutritional studies of pregnant women in East Harlem. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980;33(9):1987–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Alexander J, Meltzer HM. Validity of a new food frequency questionnaire for pregnant women in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(1):28–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Rasmussen SE, Alexander J, Samuelsen SO, Meltzer HM. Urine flavonoids and plasma carotenoids in the validation of fruit, vegetable and tea intake during pregnancy in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(8):838–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown JE, Buzzard IM, Jacobs Jr DR, et al. A food frequency questionnaire can detect pregnancy-related changes in diet. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96(3):262–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Brown MA, Prendergast JS, Ross MR, Gallery EDM. Comparing methods to assess dietary sodium intake in pregnancy. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987;87(8):1058–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bunin GR, Gyllstrom ME, Brown JE, Kahn EB, Kushi LH. Recall of diet during a past pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(12):1136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng Y, Yan H, Dibley MJ, Shen Y, Li Q, Zeng L. Validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among pregnant women in rural China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(1):166–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dar E, Kanarek MS, Anderson HA, Sonzogni WC. Fish consumption and reproductive outcomes in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Environ Res. 1992;59(1):189–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. De Vriese SR, De Henauw S, De Backer G, Dhont M, Christophe AB. Estimation of dietary fat intake of Belgian pregnant women. Comparison of two methods. Ann Nutr Metab. 2001;45(6):273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Donahue SM, Rifas-Shiman SL, Olsen SF, Gold DR, Gillman MW, Oken E. Associations of maternal prenatal dietary intake of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids with maternal and umbilical cord blood levels. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2009;80(5–6):289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Erkkola M, Karppinen M, Javanainen J, Rasanen L, Knip M, Virtanen SM. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire for pregnant Finnish women. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(5):466–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Forsythe HE, Gage B. Use of a multicultural food-frequency questionnaire with pregnant and lactating women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(1 Suppl):203S–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Greeley S, Storbakken L, Magel R. Use of a modified food frequency questionnaire during pregnancy. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11(6):728–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Innis SM, Elias SL. Intakes of essential n-6 and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids among pregnant Canadian women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(2):473–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Loy SL, Marhazlina M, Nor AY, Hamid JJ. Development, validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire in pregnancy for the Universiti Sains Malaysia birth cohort study. Malays J Nutr. 2011;17(1):1–18. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a food-frequency questionnaire among pregnant women in Malaysia.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mbofung CMF, Atinmo T. Relationship between dietary and plasma copper levels of pregnant Nigerian women. Ann Nutr Metab. 1985;29(1):48–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Mikkelsen TB, Olsen SF, Rasmussen SE, Osler M. Relative validity of fruit and vegetable intake estimated by the food frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):172–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mikkelsen TB, Osler M, Olsen SF. Validity of protein, retinol, folic acid and n-3 fatty acid intakes estimated from the food-frequency questionnaire used in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(6):771–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Miklavčič A, Cuderman P, Mazej D, et al. Biomarkers of low-level mercury exposure through fish consumption in pregnant and lactating Slovenian women. Environ Res. 2011;111(8):1201–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Morrissette J, Takser L, St-Amour G, Smargiassi A, Lafond J, Mergler D. Temporal variation of blood and hair mercury levels in pregnancy in relation to fish consumption history in a population living along the St. Lawrence River. Environ Res. 2004;95(3):363–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Moscovitch LF, Cooper BA. Folate content of diets in pregnancy: comparison of diets collected at home and diets prepared from dietary records. Am J Clin Nutr. 1973;26(7):707–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mouratidou T, Ford F, Fraser RB. Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire for use in pregnancy. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(4):515–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Oken E, Radesky JS, Wright RO, et al. Maternal fish intake during pregnancy, blood mercury levels, and child cognition at age 3 years in a US cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(10):1171–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, et al. Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a U.S. Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(10):1376–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Olsen SF, Hansen HS, Sandstrom B, Jensen B. Erythrocyte levels compared with reported dietary intake of marine n-3 fatty acids in pregnant women. Br J Nutr. 1995;73(3):387–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Parra MS, Schnaas L, Meydani M, Perroni E, Martinez S, Romieu I. Erythrocyte cell membrane phospholipid levels compared against reported dietary intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids in pregnant Mexican women. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):931–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Persson V, Winkvist A, Ninuk T, et al. Variability in nutrient intakes among pregnant women in Indonesia: implications for the design of epidemiological studies using the 24-h recall method. J Nutr. 2001;131(2):325–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pinto E, Ramos E, Severo M, et al. Measurement of dietary intake of fatty acids in pregnant women: comparison of self-reported intakes with adipose tissue levels. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20(8):599–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pinto E, Severo M, Correia S, dos Santos Silva I, Lopes C, Barros H. Validity and reproducibility of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among Portuguese pregnant women. Matern Child Nutr. 2010;6(2):105–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Robinson S, Godfrey K, Osmond C, Cox V, Barker D. Evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire used to assess nutrient intakes in pregnant women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50(5):302–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Saldana TM, Siega-Riz AM, Adair LS. Effect of macronutrient intake on the development of glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(3):479–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sartorelli DS, Nishimura RY, Castro GS, Barbieri P, Jordao AA. Validation of a FFQ for estimating omega-3, omega-6 and trans fatty acid intake during pregnancy using mature breast milk and food recalls. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(11):1259–64. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a food-frequency questionnaire estimating omega-3, omega-6 and trans fatty acid intake during pregnancy.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Shatenstein B, Xu H, Luo ZC, Fraser W. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for pregnant women. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011;72(2):60–9. This paper reports evidence of validity for a food-frequency questionnaire for pregnant women.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shiraishi M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Murayama R, Kitanaka S, Sasaki S. Validity of a self-administered diet history questionnaire for estimating vitamin D intakes of Japanese pregnant women. Matern Child Nutr. 2013. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a dietary history method among pregnant Japanese women.

  66. Shiraishi M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Murayama R, Sasaki S. Validity of a diet history questionnaire estimating beta-carotene, vitamin C and alpha-tocopherol intakes in Japanese pregnant women. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2013;64(6):694–9. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a dietary history method among pregnant Japanese women.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Shiraishi M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Murayama R, Sasaki S, Murashima S. Validity and reproducibility of folate and vitamin B12 intakes estimated from a self-administered diet history questionnaire in Japanese pregnant women. Nutr J. 2012;15(15). This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a dietary history method among pregnant Japanese women.

  68. Shiraishi M, Haruna M, Matsuzaki M, Murayama R, Yatsuki Y, Sasaki S. Estimation of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intakes in pregnant Japanese women without nausea by using a self-administered diet history questionnaire. Nutr Res (New York, NY). 2013;33(6):473–8. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a dietary history method among pregnant Japanese women.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Suitor CJ, Gardner J, Willett WC. A comparison of food frequency and diet recall methods in studies of nutrient intake of low-income pregnant women. J Am Diet Assoc. 1989;89(12):1786–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Van Den Berg AS, Mayer J. Comparison of one-day food record and research dietary history on a group of obese pregnant women. J Am Diet Assoc. 1954;30(12):1239–44.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Venter C, Higgins B, Grundy J, Clayton CB, Gant C, Dean T. Reliability and validity of a maternal food frequency questionnaire designed to estimate consumption of common food allergens. J Hum Nutr Diet Off J Br Diet Assoc. 2006;19(2):129–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Vian I, Zielinsky P, Zilio AM, et al. Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire for consumption of polyphenol-rich foods in pregnant women. Matern Child Nutr. 2013. This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a food-frequency questionnaire for consumption of polyphenol-rich foods in pregnant women.

  73. Vioque J, Navarrete-Munoz EM, Gimenez-Monzo D, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire among pregnant women in a Mediterranean area. Nutr J. 2013;12(1). This paper reports evidence of validity and reliability for a food-frequency questionnaire among pregnant women in a Mediterranean area.

  74. Wei EK, Gardner J, Field AE, Rosner BA, Colditz GA, Suitor CW. Validity of a food frequency questionnaire in assessing nutrient intakes of low-income pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 1999;3(4):241–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Williams MA, Frederick IO, Qiu C, et al. Maternal erythrocyte omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, and plasma lipid concentrations, are associated with habitual dietary fish consumption in early pregnancy. Clin Biochem. 2006;39(11):1063–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Woekener JP, Pitkin RM. Urinary urea-nitrogen ratio as an index of protein nutrition in diabetic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1978;51(5):573–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhou SJ, Schilling MJ, Makrides M. Evaluation of an iron specific checklist for the assessment of dietary iron intake in pregnant and postpartum women. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif). 2005;21(9):908–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Matorras R, Perteagudo L, Sanjurjo P, Ruiz JI. Intake of long chain w3 polyunsaturated fatty acids during pregnancy and the influence of levels in the mother on newborn levels. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;83(2):179–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. This book is a useful resource on nutritional epidemiology.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im is recipient of a doctoral research award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im and Julie Robitaille each declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Robitaille.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vézina-Im, LA., Robitaille, J. Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Measures of Foods and Nutrients in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Curr Nutr Rep 3, 245–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-014-0090-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-014-0090-6

Keywords

Navigation