Abstract
This report shows that weed harrowing in organic cereal fields is an efficient alternative to herbicides since weed harrowing does not reduce yields compared to weed-free plots. Arable weeds provide resources and habitat to many organisms. However, weeds are the most important constraint to crop production. Indeed, the potential crop losses of the eight major crops due to weed–crop competition amount to about 30 %. New ways of food production are needed due to the current severe biodiversity decline, about 1,000 times higher than the natural rate of species loss, and the growing food demands. Herbicides are highly efficient at reducing crop losses due to weed–crop competition, but at the expense of declining biodiversity. Studies have shown a poor efficiency of weed harrows in terms of weed reduction in organic farming systems. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of weed harrows in organic fields to reduce weeds to a threshold that does not limit crop production, while maintaining a rich flora. The results were compared to results obtained using herbicides in conventionally managed fields. Eleven organic and conventional cereal field pairs in Catalonia, Spain, were evaluated for one season in 2006–2007. Three different weed control treatments were applied: weed-free plots; weed-controlled plots, using herbicide in conventional fields and weed harrowing in organic ones and non-weeded plots. Crop yield and the abundance, richness and composition of the weed flora, which was dominated by ryegrass and poppies, were evaluated. Our results show that weed harrowing prevents weeds from being a limiting factor of crop productivity in organic cereal fields, since weed-controlled plots did not reduce yields compared to weed-free plots. A similar trend was observed in herbicide-controlled plots. However, herbicides diminished weed species richness in approximately 47 % and changed the species composition whereas harrowing allowed the maintenance of high levels of weed diversity in the organic fields.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armengot L, José-María L, Blanco-Moreno JM, Bassa M, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2011a) A novel index of land use intensity for organic and conventional farming of Mediterranean cereal fields. Agron Sustain Dev 31:699–707. doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0042-0
Armengot L, José-María L, Blanco-Moreno JM, Romero-Puente A, Sans FX (2011b) Landscape and land-use effects on weed flora in Mediterranean cereal fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:311–317. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.001
Baayen RH (2008) languageR: data sets and functions with “Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 0.953
Bàrberi P (2002) Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res 42:177–193. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2002.00277.x
Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B (2008) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Version 0.999375-26. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 19 February 2009
Booth BD, Swanton CJ (2002) Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci 50:2–13
Boutin C, Elmegaard N, Kjaer C (2004) Toxicity testing of fifteen non-crop plant species with six herbicides in a greenhouse experiment: implications for risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 13:823–825. doi:10.1023/B:ECTX.0000033092.82507.f3
Cirujeda A, Aibar J, Zaragoza C (2011) Remarkable changes of weed species in Spanish cereal fields from 1976 to 2007. Agron Sustain Dev 31:275–288. doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0030-4
Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F, Plantureux S (2005) Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 25:1–15. doi:10.1051/agro:2004049
Gerowitt B (2003) Development and control of weeds in arable farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:247–254. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00084-7
Heap I (2010) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. At: http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed 15 November 2011
José-María L, Sans FX (2011) Weed seedbanks in arable fields: effects of management practices and surrounding landscape. Weed Res 51:631–640. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00872.x
Légère A, Stevenson FC, Benoit DL (2005) Diversity and assembly of weed communities: contrasting responses across cropping systems. Weed Res 45:303–315
Lundkvist A (2009) Effects of pre- and post-emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals. Weed Res 49:409–416. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00718.x
Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR, Ward LK (2003) The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res 43:77–89. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00326.x
Milberg P, Hallgren E (2004) Yield loss due to weeds in cereals and its large-scale variability in Sweden. Field Crop Res 86:199–209. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.08.006
Nazarko OM, Van Acker RC, Entz MH, Schoofs A, Martens G (2003) Pesticide free production of field crops: results of an on-farm pilot project. Agron J 95:1262–1273. doi:10.2134/agronj2003.1262
Oerke EC, Dehne HW (2004) Safeguarding production–losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot 23:275–285. doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.001
Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, Simpson G, Sólymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H (2009) Vegan—Community Ecology Package Project. R package version 1.15-2. At: http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 22 March 2009
Pannell DJ (1990) An economic response model of herbicide application for weed-control. Aust J Agric Econ 34:223–241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.1990.tb00497.x
Petit S, Boursault A, Le Guilloux M, Munier-Jolain N, Reboud X (2011) Weeds in agricultural landscapes. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:309–317. doi:10.1051/agro/2010020
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 19 February 2009
Rasmussen J, Kurtzmann J, Jensen A (2004) Tolerance of competitive spring barley cultivars to weed harrowing. Weed Res 44:446–452. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00419.x
Romero A, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2008) Weed diversity in crop edges and inner fields of organic and conventional dryland winter cereal crops in NE Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:97–104. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.002
Ryan MR, Mortensen DA, Bastiaans L, Teasdale JR, Mirsky SB, Curran WS, Seidel R, Wilson DO, Hepperly PR (2010) Elucidating the apparent maize tolerance to weed competition in long-term organically managed systems. Weed Res 50:25–36. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00750.x
Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA (2012) Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485:229–232. doi:10.1038/nature11069
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Sumption P, Firth C, Davies G (2004) Observation on agronomic challenges during conversion to organic field vegetable production. In: Hopkins A (ed), Organic farming: science and practice of profitable livestock and cropping. Proceedings of the BGS/AAB/COR conference. British Grassland Society, pp.176–179
Teasdale JR, Coffman CB, Mangum RW (2007) Potential long-term benefits of no-tillage and organic cropping systems for grain production and soil improvement. Agron J 99:1297–1305. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0362
Ulber L, Steinmann H, Klimek S, Isselstein J (2009) An on-farm approach to investigate the impact of diversified crop rotations on weed species richness and composition in winter wheat. Weed Res 49:534–543. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00722.x
Acknowledgments
We thank E. Lichtfouse and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript, the farmers for their collaboration and A. Romero, E.J. Velásquez, P. González, H.F. Osorio and Z. Čermáková for their field and lab assistance. This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science with a fellowship to the first author and the projects CGL2006-13190-C03-01 and CGL2009-13497-C02-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Armengot, L., José-María, L., Chamorro, L. et al. Weed harrowing in organically grown cereal crops avoids yield losses without reducing weed diversity. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 405–411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0107-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0107-8