Abstract
The advancement of translational behavioral medicine will require that we discover new methods of managing large volumes of data from disparate sources such as disease surveillance systems, public health systems, and health information systems containing patient-centered data informed by behavioral and social sciences. The term “liquidity,” when applied to data, refers to its availability and free flow throughout human/computer interactions. In seeking to achieve liquidity, the focus is not on creating a single, comprehensive database or set of coordinated datasets, nor is it solely on developing the electronic health record as the “one-stop shopping” source of health-related data. Rather, attention is on ensuring the availability of secure data through the various methods of collecting and storing data currently existent or under development—so that these components of the health information infrastructure together support a liquid data system. The value of accessible, interoperable, high-volume, reliable, secure, and contextually appropriate data is becoming apparent in many areas of the healthcare system, and health information liquidity is currently viewed as an important component of a patient-centered healthcare system. The translation from research interventions to behavioral and psychosocial indicators challenges the designers of healthcare systems to include this new set of data in the correct context. With the intention of advancing translational behavioral medicine at the local level, “on the ground” in the clinical office and research institution, this commentary discusses data liquidity from the patient’s and clinician’s perspective, requirements for a liquid healthcare data system, and the ways in which data liquidity can support translational behavioral medicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernethy, A. P., & Wheeler, J. L. (2011). True translational research: Bridging the three phases of translation through data and behavior. Translational Behavioral Medicine. doi:10.1007/s13142-010-0013-z.
Sung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr., Genel, M., et al. (2003). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA, 289(10), 1278–1287.
Dougherty, D., & Conway, P. H. (2008). The “3T’s” road map to transform US health care: The “how” of high-quality care. Jama, 299(19), 2319–2321.
DeWalt, D. A., Davis, T. C., Wallace, A. S., et al. (2009). Goal setting in diabetes self-management: Taking the baby steps to success. Patient Education and Counseling, 77(2), 218–223.
Kim, M. T., Han, H. R., Song, H. J., et al. (2009). A community-based, culturally tailored behavioral intervention for Korean Americans with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator, 35(6), 986–994.
Curry, S. J., Keller, P. A., Orleans, C. T., & Fiore, M. C. (2008). The role of health care systems in increased tobacco cessation. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 411–428.
Fiore, M. C., & Jaen, C. R. (2008). A clinical blueprint to accelerate the elimination of tobacco use. Jama, 299(17), 2083–2085.
Fiore, M. C., Keller, P. A., & Curry, S. J. (2007). Health system changes to facilitate the delivery of tobacco-dependence treatment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(6 Suppl), S349–S356.
Smith, S. S., McCarthy, D. E., Japuntich, S. J., et al. (2009). Comparative effectiveness of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies in primary care clinics. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(22), 2148–2155.
Slutsky, J. R. (2007). Moving closer to a rapid-learning health care system. Health Affairs, 26(2), w122–w124.
Cukier K. A special report on managing information: Data, data everywhere. The Economist. Accessed July 9, 2010 at http://www.citeulike.org/user/isp/article/6744432?citation_format=apa#2010.
Gray, J. A. (1998). Where’s the chief knowledge officer? To manage the most precious resource of all. BMJ, 317(7162), 26.
Gray, J. A., & de Lusignan, S. (1999). Information in practice: national electronic library for health (NELH). BMJ, 319, 1476–1479.
Abernethy, A. P., Coeytaux, R. R., Carson, K., et al. (2009). Technology assessment: Report on the evidence regarding off-label indications for targeted therapies used in cancer treatment. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Tunis, S. R., Stryer, D. B., & Clancy, C. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Jama, 290(12), 1624–1632.
Shneiderman, B. (1993). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human–computer interaction. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Greitzer, F. L., Dauenhauer, P. M., Wierks, T. G. D., & Podmore, R. (2009). Human factors evaluation of advanced electric power grid visualization tools richland, WA: PNNL-18386, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Patel, V. L., & Currie, L. M. (2006). Clinical cognition and biomedical informatics: Issues of patient safety. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 122, 18–22.
Thew, S., Sutcliffe, A., Procter, R., et al. (2009). Requirements engineering for E-science: Experiences in epidemiology. IEEE Software, 26(1), 80–87.
Holbrook, T. L., Galarneau, M. R., Dye, J. L., Quinn, K., & Dougherty, A. L. (2010). Morphine use after combat injury in Iraq and post-traumatic stress disorder. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362(2), 110–117.
Penfield, S. L., Anderson, K. M., Edmunds, M., & Belanger, M. (2009). Toward health information liquidity: realization of better, more efficient care from the free flow of health information: Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.
Pignone, M., DeWalt, D. A., Sheridan, S., Berkman, N., & Lohr, K. N. (2005). Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy. A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(2), 185–192.
NIMH Multisite HIV/STD Prevention Trial for African American Couples Group. (2008). Eban health promotion intervention: Conceptual basis and procedures. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49(1), 1.
Microsoft. Personal Home—HealthVault. 2010; http://www.healthvault.com/personal/index.aspx. Accessed December 13, 2010.
About Google Health. http://www.google.com/intl/en-US/health/about/. Accessed December 15, 2010.
Johnson, J. D., Case, D. O., Andrews, J. E., & Allard, S. L. (2005). Genomics—the perfect information-seeking research problem. Journal of Health Communication, 10(4), 323–329.
Fisher, E. B., Brownson, C. A., O’Toole, M. L., Shetty, G., Anwuri, V. V., & Glasgow, R. E. (2005). Ecological approaches to self-management: The case of diabetes. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1523–1535.
Green, C. J., Fortin, P., Maclure, M., Macgregor, A., & Robinson, S. (2006). Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(12), 818–828.
O’Reilly T. The Architecture of Participation. 2004; http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/articles/architecture_of_participation.html. Accessed December 14, 2010.
Moser, R. P. (2011). The grid-enabled measures (GEM) database: A science 2.0 tool to facilitate the use of standardized measures and sharing harmonized data. American Journal of Preventive Medicine (in press).
National Cancer Institute; Division of Cancer Control and Population Science. PopSciGrid Community Health Data Portal. http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/hcirb/cyberinfrastructure/popsci.html. Accessed December 14, 2010.
Forman, M. R., Greene, S. M., Avis, N. E., et al. (2010). Bioinformatics: Tools to accelerate population science and disease control research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(6), 646–651.
Society for Behavioral Medicine. Translational Behavioral Medicine: Practice, Policy, Research. Facebook page. Accessed July 9, 2010 at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Translational-Behavioral-Medicine-Practice-Policy-Research/117857348230430#!/pages/Translational-Behavioral-Medicine-Practice-Policy-Research/117857348230430?v=info.
Kazdin, A. E. (1983). Single-case research designs in clinical child psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 22(5), 423–432.
Abernethy, A. P., Keefe, F. J., McCrory, D. C., Scipio, C. D., & Matchar, D. B. (2005). Technology assessment on the use of behavioral therapies for treatment of medical disorders: Part 2—Impact on management of patients with cancer pain. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Uronis, H. E., Currow, D. C., McCrory, D. C., Samsa, G. P., & Abernethy, A. P. (2008). Oxygen for relief of dyspnoea in mildly- or non-hypoxaemic patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer, 98(2), 294–299.
Abernethy, A. P., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (2003). A clinical decision and economic analysis model of cancer pain management. The American Journal of Managed Care, 9(10), 651–664.
Hesse, B. W., Ahern, B. K., & Woods, S. S. (2011). Nudging best practice: The HITECH act and behavioral medicine. Translational Behavioral Medicine. doi:10.1007/s13142-010-0001-3.
Acknowledgments
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by NIH Grants P01 AR050245, R01 CA122704, R01 CA131148, R01 CA100771, R01 AR054626, R01 NR010777, and R01 NS053759 and a Within Our Reach grant from the American College of Rheumatology. Additionally, this project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract no. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Disclaimers
None.
Competing interests
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Implications
Practice: In a liquid data system, behavioral medicine clinicians stand to benefit from the greater availability of data that can help guide their clinical decisions and assist them in monitoring patients’ status and outcomes.
Policy: Large, population-based datasets could provide a strong foundation for healthcare policy decision-making and could be especially useful in areas such as behavioral medicine that warrant advocacy based on sound, generalizable evidence.
Research: A liquid data environment would make data more readily available for researchers to examine and analyze, aggregate, share and compare, and generally utilize for multiple research purposes such as identification of clinically important research questions and conduct of diverse research studies.
About this article
Cite this article
Abernethy, A.P., Wheeler, J.L., Courtney, P.K. et al. Supporting implementation of evidence-based behavioral interventions: the role of data liquidity in facilitating translational behavioral medicine. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 1, 45–52 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0024-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-011-0024-4