Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the factors that contribute to the decision to choose single embryo transfer (SET).

Methods

Two hundred and nine patients who underwent ART treatment in our clinics between April 2006 and May 2007 were enrolled in this study. All patients had elected to undergo SET before the start of each treatment cycle; a questionnaire was administered to all patients prior to the SET procedure.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 34.6 years old (range: 24–45 years). The mean number of redundant embryos was 3.7 (range: 1–17), and the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 25.7%. A total of 121 patients (57.9%) who underwent SET returned their questionnaires. Based on the results of questionnaire, 56.2% of patients who received SET waived their right to choose between single and double embryo transfer. Among patients who selected SET, 67.6% believed that the pregnancy rate resulting from double embryo transfer (DET) is significantly greater than that associated with SET, and 25% of patients wanted to have twins. The majority of patients (80.9%) who underwent SET understood that multi-fetal pregnancy increases the risk of complications during gestation and delivery. Among all patients who completed the questionnaire, 72.8% believed that the number of transferred embryos should not be controlled by law.

Conclusions

The results of the present study show that greater than one-half of patients who underwent SET were faced with a dilemma––the difficult choice between their own desires and their clinician’s recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edward RG, Steptoe PC. Current status of in-vitro fertilization, implantation of human embryos. Lancet. 1983;2:1265–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wramsby H, Sundström P, Liedholm P. Pregnancy rate in relation to number of cleaved eggs replaced after in-vitro fertilization in stimulated cycles monitored by serum levels oestradiol and progesterone as sole index. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:325–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hyden-Granslog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple births. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2392–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablanowska B, Pinborg A, Strandel A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Japanese Society of Reproductive Medicine, editors. Guideline for reproductive medicine 2007. Tokyo: Kanehara-Shuppan; 2007.

  6. Blennborn M, Hellberg D, Nilsson S. Diffrences in female and male perception of information and decision-making in single-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization in Sweden. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:337–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerra D, Llobera A, Veiga A, Barri PN. Psychiatric morbidity in couples attending a fertility service. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1733–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eugster A, Vingerhoests AJ, van Heck GL, Merkus JM. The effect of episodic anxiety on an in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome: a pilot study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;25:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakagawa K, Ohgi S, Kojima R, Ito M, Horikawa T, Irahara M, et al. Reduction of perifollicular arterial blood flow resistance after hCG administration is a good indicator of the recovery of mature oocytes in ART treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006;23:433–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakagawa K, Yamano S, Moride N, Yamashita M, Yoshizawa M, Aono T. Effect of activation with Ca ionophore A23187 and puromycin on the development of human oocytes that failed to fertilize after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:148–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Oka C, Kasai M, et al. Vitrification of human blastocystsusing ctyoloops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:384–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Golombok S. Psychological functioning in infertility patients. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:208–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Newton CR, Hearn MT, Yuspee AA. Psychological assessment and follow-up after in-vitro fertilization: assessing the impact of failure. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:879–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edelman RJ, Connoly KJ, Bartlett H. Coping strategies and psychological adjustment of coupls presenting for IVF. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Freeman EW, Boxer AS, Rickels K, Tureck R, Mastrioianni L. Psychological evaluation and support in a program if in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:48–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldfarb J, kinzer DJ, Boyle M, Kurit D. Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples towards multiple pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:815–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grobman WA, Milad MP, Stout J, Klock SC. Patient perceptions of multiple gestation: as assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:920–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshimura Y, Hoshiai T. The regarding about prevention of multi-fetal pregnancy in Assisted Reproductive Technology treatment. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn. 2008;60:1159.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thurin A, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Rondomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and pediatric outcome and a cost-effective analysis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:210–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour GI, Templeton A. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;18:CD003416.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjö T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm U-B. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilization in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:1579–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for preeclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330:549–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamberger L, Hazekamp J. Towards single embryo transfer in IVF. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;55:141–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Reproductive Medicine, Sugiyama Clinic, 1-53-1, Ohara, Setagaya, Tokyo, 156-0041, Japan

    Rikikazu Sugiyama, Koji Nakagawa, Yayoi Nishi, Rie Sugiyama, Kei Ezaki & Masato Inoue

Authors
  1. Rikikazu Sugiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koji Nakagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yayoi Nishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rie Sugiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kei Ezaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masato Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rikikazu Sugiyama.

About this article

Cite this article

Sugiyama, R., Nakagawa, K., Nishi, Y. et al. The dilemma faced by patients who undergo single embryo transfer. Reprod Med Biol 8, 33–37 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-008-0006-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12522-008-0006-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation