Abstract
In August 2010, assisted reproduction became fully covered in Québec by the public healthcare system. With this coverage, the government imposed a strict elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy. This led to a dramatic increase in eSET from 1.6 % before implementation of the program to 71 % three years later. As a result, high-order multiple births have been virtually eliminated, and the rate of ART-conceived twins has been greatly reduced. However, this benefit seems to be associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate per fresh embryo transfer cycle: from 37.6 % to 22.4 %. Pregnancy rates after cumulative eSET of cryopreserved embryos seem to be similar, however. Analysis of hospital databases demonstrates that the clinical impact of eSET is reflected by lower premature birthrates and lower neonatal ICU admissions, both of which are applauded by high-risk obstetrics specialists and neonatologists. Infertile couples are grateful to have access to such treatment regardless of their financial ability to pay. Consequently, single embryo transfer has quickly become universally accepted in Québec and is now expected by almost all couples undergoing ART.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2009 results from the Canadian ART Register. 2009. http://www.cfas.ca/images/stories/pdf/CARTR_2009.pdf. Accessed 2014 Oct 4.
Renvoi relatif à la Loi sur la procréation assistée, 2010 CSC 61, [2010] 3 R.C.S. 457 (décision du 22 décembre 2010).
Bissonette F. The first 6 months of IVF funding. 2010. http://www.cfas.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1122&Itemid=691. Accessed 2014 Oct 5.
Velez MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips SJ, Bissonnette F. Rapid policy change to single-embryo transfer while maintaining pregnancy rates per initiated cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:506–11.
Lopez-Regalado ML, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing elective single-embryo transfer followed by single-embryo cryotransfer versus double embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;178:192–8.
Salois R. Avis détaillé sur les activités de procréation assistée au Québec. 2014. http://www.csbe.gouv.qc.ca/en/publication/avis-detaille-sur-les-activites-de-procreation-assistee-au-quebec.html. Accessed 2014 Oct 4.
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2011 results from the Canadian ART Register. 2011. http://www.cfas.ca/images/stories/pdf/CARTR_2011.pdf. Accessed 2014 Oct 4.
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2010 results from the Canadian ART Register. 2010. http://www.cfas.ca/images/stories/pdf/CARTR_2010.pdf. Accessed 2014 Oct 14.
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2012 results from the Canadian ART Register. 2012. http://www.cfas.ca/images/stories/pdf/CARTR_2012.pdf. Accessed 2014 Oct 14.
Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:645–50.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weibel, H.S., Buckett, W. (2015). Single Embryo Transfer: The Québec Experience. In: Sills, E. (eds) Screening the Single Euploid Embryo. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16892-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16892-0_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16891-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16892-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)