Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differences in Engaging in Sexual Disclosure Between Real Life and Cyberspace Among Adolescents: Social Penetration Model Revisited

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To date, relatively few studies have begun to explore adolescents’ sexual self-disclosure in cyberspace. Rare research has taken a close look at differences in adolescents’ sexual self-disclosure occurring in real life and cyberspace. The social penetration model suggests that an individual’s level of sexual disclosure should be in accordance with relationship intimacy in real life. The current study investigated whether the effects of relationship intimacy on adolescents’ willingness to disclose sexual history differ in terms of sex and communication environment (real life vs. cyberspace). A total of 419 Taiwanese adolescents completed a survey about their willingness to communicate on different sexual topics in the contexts of varying levels of relationship intimacy. The results showed that in real life both male and female adolescents showed a parallel relationship between willingness to engage in sexual disclosure and relationship intimacy, supporting predictions according to the social penetration model. However, in cyberspace, male adolescents exhibited a greater willingness to communicate, regardless of degree of relationship intimacy, whereas females revealed a U-shape trend regarding the effect of relationship intimacy on willingness to communicate. These findings indicate that sexual disclosure on the part of adolescents in cyberspace departs from the perspective of the social penetration model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration and the development of interpersonal relationship. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrke, R., & Fuqua, D. (1987). Sex differences in same-and cross-sex supportive relationships. Sex Roles, 17, 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M., & Peplau, L. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. A., Salazar, L. F., Bernhardt, J. M., & Burgress-Whitman, N. (2005). Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: results from online focus group. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 535–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, W.-B. (2007). Adolescents’ reply intent for sexual disclosure in cyberspace: gender differences and effects of anonymity and topic intimacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 725–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, W.-B., & Wan, C.-S. (2006). Sexual self-disclosure in cyberspace among Taiwanese adolescents: gender differences and the interplay of cyberspace and real life. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2002). Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., & Griffin-Shelley, E. (2002). The Internet: the next sexual revolution. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Scherer, C., Boies, S. C., & Gordon, B. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: online sexual behavior from sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Delmonico, D., & Burg, R. (2000). Cyber sex users and abusers: new findings and implications. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Preventions, 7, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Griffin-Shelley, E., Delmonico, D. L., & Mathy, R. (2001). Online sexual problems: assessment and predictive variables. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Preventions, 8, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubbin, C., Santelli, J., Brindis, C. D., & Braveman, P. (2005). Neighborhood context and sexual behaviors among adolescents: findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37, 125–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., & Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation: the absent of self-awareness and self-regulation on group numbers. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, K. G., & Minowa, N. (1997). Gender differences in self-presentation: a comparison of the roles of flatteringness and intimacy in self-disclosure to friends. Sex Roles, 36, 371–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, K. G., Meyer, L., & Schwartz, J. (1991). Effects of gender, target’s gender, topic, and self-esteem on disclosure to best and midling friends. Sex Roles, 25, 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, P., Govern, J., Petri, H., & Figler, M. (1995). Anonymity and aggressive driving behavior: a field study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, T. D. (1986). Parent-child communication about sex and young adolescents’ sexual knowledge and attitudes. Adolescence, 21, 517–528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frankowski, B. L. (2004). Sexual orientation and adolescents. Pediatrics, 113, 1827–1832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., & Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual behaviors and attitudes of adolescent girls with older vs. similar-aged boyfriends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, T. W. (2003). Adolescent homosexuality and concerns regarding disclosure. Journal of School Health, 73, 107–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, I. C. (2001). Taiwan BBS users’ self-disclosure, inclination of self-presentation in plan file, and Perception of the nickname [in Chinese]. Unpublished mater’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.

  • Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liau, L., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27, 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. H., & Yeh, C. H. (1999). Online sexuality report [in Chinese]. Taipei: Explore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to Internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. B., & Sharp, S. M. (1973). Self-disclosing communication. Journal of Communication, 23, 409–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, J., Steinleitner, M., & Lilli, W. (1987). Wearing uniforms and aggression: a field experiment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 357–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M. (1990). Intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 23, 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostosky, S. S., Wilcox, B. L., Wright, M. L. C., & Randall, B. A. (2004). The impact of religiosity on adolescent sexual behavior: a review of the evidence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 677–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, W. E., Jr., Miller, R., & Belk, S. (1988). Development of the emotional self disclosure scale. Sex Roles, 18, 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, C. L., & Gleason, J. H. (2001). Does source of sex education predict adolescents’ sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior? Education, 121, 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, E. Y., Pruitt, B. E., McNamara, J., & Colwell, B. (2000). The Journal of Scholl Health, 70, 413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1925). A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, P. M. (2001). The psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C.-S., Chung, S.-H., & Chiou, W.-B. (2009). Contingent impression management in sexual disclosure by older adolescents corresponding in cyberspace: the role of gender dyads. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 1023–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, E. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner-Wilson, R. J. (1998). Gender differences in adolescent sexual attitudes: the influence of individual and family factors. Adolescence, 33, 519–531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. C., & Huang, K. K. (1980). The model of self-disclosure and its related variables [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 26, 51–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: individuation, reason and order, versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1975). Transforming experimental research into advocacy for social change. In M. Deutsch & H. A. Hornstein (Eds.), Applying social psychology: Implications for research, practice and training (pp. 33–66). Hillsdale: Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research (Project No. NSC 92-2815-C-328-006-S). We also thank Wang Siang for data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication, Chang Jung Christian University, 396 Chang Jung Rd., Sec.1, Kway Jen, Tainan, 71101, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Mu-Li Yang

  2. Department of Chinese Culinary Arts, National Kaohsiung Hospitality College, 1 Sung-Ho Road, Kaohsiung, 812, Republic of China

    Chao-Chin Yang

  3. Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-Sen University, 70 Lien-Hai Rd., Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Wen-Bin Chiou

Authors
  1. Mu-Li Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chao-Chin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen-Bin Chiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Bin Chiou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, ML., Yang, CC. & Chiou, WB. Differences in Engaging in Sexual Disclosure Between Real Life and Cyberspace Among Adolescents: Social Penetration Model Revisited. Curr Psychol 29, 144–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9078-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9078-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation