Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High-growth firms: does location matter?

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The challenge for economies lies in boosting employment growth, not just by fostering entrepreneurship, but also by improving the growth potential of existing firms. Consequently, many studies have focused on assessing the dynamism of firms, and especially the capacity of high-growth firms (HGFs) to generate employment. This study aimed to identify HGFs in Spain during two periods, 2003–2006 and 2007–2010 and to analyse their characteristics and territorial distribution during the initial years of the economic crisis. Accordingly, a key area of inquiry of the study was the influence of agglomeration (in metropolitan areas, industrial districts and technological districts) on the locations of HGFs. To analyse the influence of location on the probability of firms being HGFs, a logit model was estimated. The main results supported the study’s hypotheses that technological districts and large urban areas are significantly associated with the probability of firms being HGFs, because firms profit from comparative locational advantages offered by these areas. The importance of HGFs requires special emphasis in relation to Spain’s context of economic crisis and high unemployment levels because of their significant contribution to employment generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Other studies have used indicators such as Birch’s index that defines growth of employment, turnover or other variables as (Xt1 - Xt0)(Xt1/Xt0), where X is the variable being analysed.

  2. This database does not provide exhaustive information about multi-plant firms as it only includes information about the firm’s headquarters. Therefore, location analysis was limited to firm-level data. Information about mergers and acquisitions was also not provided.

  3. This publication defines LUAs as areas that have just one municipality with more than 50,000 inhabitants or a group of municipalities with at least one of them comprising more than 50,000 inhabitants. SUAs are defined as follows: cities with a population of between 20,000 and 50,000 inhabitants and urban municipalities with a population of between 10,000 and 20,000 inhabitants. There are 748 LUAs and 325 SUAs in Spain.

  4. The dataset used here only includes firms with 10 or more employees. Therefore, new jobs created by smaller and new firms established during the periods 2003–2006 and 2007–2010 were not considered in this analysis.

  5. A greater reduction of employment must be considered in light of the number of firms that closed down during the period 2007–2010. These are not included here.

  6. Analysis for the period 2003–2006 was not possible as enterprise-level microdata were not available for this period.

  7. A complete list of the economic sectors included in each category can be viewed at: http://www.ine.es/en/daco/daco43/notaiat_en.pdf (accessed January 28, 2015).

  8. A high level of regional concentration can be clearly observed, with four regions accounting for 60 % of HGFs: Catalonia (21.1 %), Madrid (13.3 %), Andalucía (12.5 %) and the Valencian Region (11.5 %). A large number of specialised areas in Spain are also concentrated in these regions.

  9. Estimation was not possible for the period 2003–2006, because enterprise-level microdata were not available for this period.

  10. The estimation of the model using the whole dataset showed 97 % predictive accuracy (Total). However, only 3 % was correctly predicted for HGF = 1 (Yes)

  11. The sample was obtained using the following basic sectoral classification: agriculture, industry, services and construction.

  12. A linear regression was estimated to obtain collinearity statistics, enabling the removal of those variables with a Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) higher than 10. This process was carried out repeatedly to obtain the final data set.

References

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Flores, E. (2011). University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence. Small Business Economics, 36, 365–376. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9224-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2004). The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(2), 244–278. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: mice, gazelles and elephants. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 85–100. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9052-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde, H., & Guerrero, M. (2014). Open business models in entrepreneurial stages: evidence from young Spanish firms during expansionary and recessionary periods. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s11365-014-0348-x.

  • Amat, O., Fontrodona, J., Hernández, J. M., & Stoyanova, A. (2010). Les empreses d’alt creixement i les gaseles a Catalunya. Papers d’Economia Industrial, 29, Generalitat de Catalunya.

  • Anyadike-Danes, M., Bonner, K., Hart, M., & Mason, C. (2009). Measuring business growth. High-growth firms and their contribution to employment in the UK. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighetti, A., & Lasagni, A. (2013). Assessing the determinants of high-growth manufacturing firms in Italy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 20(2), 245–267. doi:10.1080/13571516.2013.783456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Entrepreneurship: A survey of the literature. Enterprise Papers, 14, European Commission.

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2012). Determinants of high-growth entrepreneurship. OECD/DBA International Workshop on “High-growth firms: local policies and local determinants”, Copenhagen, 28 March 2012. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Audretsch_determinants%20of%20high-growth%20firms.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2014.

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Dohse, D. (2007). Location: a neglected determinant of firm growth. Review of World Economics, 143(1), 33–45. doi:10.1007/s10290-007-0099-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Arenius, P., & Wallenius, H. (2000). Economic impact of gazelle firms in Finland, Working Papers Series, 2000(3). Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business.

  • Barbosa, N., & Eiriz, V. (2011). Regional variation of firm size and growth: the Portuguese case. Growth and Change, 42(2), 125–158. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2257.2011.00547.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, G. (1992). El distrito industrial marshalliano como concepto socioeconómico. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Los distritos industriales y las pequeñas empresas I. Distritos industriales y cooperación interempresarial en Italia (pp. 61–79). Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellandi, M. (1986). El distrito industrial en Alfred Marshall. Estudios Territoriales, 20, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERR (Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) (2008). High growth firms in the UK: Lessons from an analysis of comparative UK performance. Economics Paper, 3.

  • Birch, D. L. (1979). The job generation process. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L., & Medoff, J. (1994). Gazelles. In L. C. Solmon & A. R. Levenson (Eds.), Labor markets, employment policy and job creation. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L., Haggerty, A., & Parsons, W. (1995). Who’s creating jobs? Boston: Cognetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjuggren, C.M., Daunfeldt, S.O., & Johansson, D. (2010). Ownership and high-growth firms. Working Paper, 147. Stockholm: The Ratio Institute.

  • Bogas, P., & Barbosa, N. (2013). High-growth firms: what is the impact of region-specific characteristics? NIPE Working Papers, 19/2013. NIPE - Universidade do Minho.

  • Boix, R., & Galletto, V. (2006). El nuevo mapa de los distritos industriales de España y su comparación con Italia y el Reino Unido. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Spanish Regional Science Association, Ourense, November 16–28.

  • Boix, R., & Trullén, J. (2011). La relevancia empírica de los distritos industriales marshallianos y los sistemas productivos locales manufactureros de gran empresa en España. Investigaciones Regionales, 19, 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J., & Stam, E. (2011). Gazelles, industry growth and structural change. Working Paper, 11–02. Utrecht School of Economics.

  • Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 211–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1992). El concepto de distrito industrial: su génesis. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Los distritos industriales y las pequeñas empresas I. Distritos industriales y cooperación interempresarial en Italia (pp. 25–37). Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A., & Hölzl, W. (2010). Firm growth: Empirical analysis. Papers on Economics and Evolution, 1002. Max Planck Institute of Economics.

  • Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, A., Acosta, M., González, A. L., & Medina, U. (2003). Size, age, activity sector on the growth of the small and medium firm size. Small Business Economics, 21, 289–307. doi:10.1023/A:1025783505635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J. S. (1999). Predictive performance of the binary logit model in unbalanced samples. The Statistician, 48(1), 85–94. doi:10.1111/1467-9884.0017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daunfeldt, S. O., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2013). The economic contribution of high-growth firms: do policy implications depend on the choice of growth indicator? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. doi:10.1007/s10842-013-0168-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daunfeldt, S. O., Elert, N., & Johansson, D. (2015). Are high-growth firms overrepresented in high-tech industries? Industrial and Corporate Change. doi:10.1093/icc/dtv035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. (2003). Hunting for new employment: The role of high-growth firms. In D. A. Kirby & A. Watson (Eds.), Small firms and economic development in developed and transition economies: A reader (pp. 7–19). Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. (2006). High-growth firms and their contribution to employment: The case of Sweden. In F. Delmar & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms (pp. 156–178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Kirchhoff, B., Hatemi-J, A. & Gustavsson, H. (2002). Empirical Analysis of Employment Growth Factors Using Swedish Data. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 332--349.

  • De la Vega, I. (Ed.) (2007). Análisis de crecimiento en la empresa consolidada española. Dirección General de Política de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa. Madrid: Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio.

  • Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 189–216. doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00080-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the late 1980’s. Journal of Industrial Economics, 422, 115–140. doi:10.2307/2950485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberts, R. W., & McMillen, D. P. (1999). Agglomeration economies and urban public infrastructure. In P. Cheshire & E. S. Mills (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1455–1495). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escuela de Organización Industrial. (2007). La creación de empresas en España: Un enfoque sectorial y territorial. Madrid: Escuela de Organización Industrial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espitia-Escuer, M., García-Cebrián, L. I., & Muñoz-Porcar, A. (2015). Location as a competitive advantage for entrepreneurship an empirical application in the Region of Aragon (Spain). International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(1), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenhall, B., & Junkka, F. (2009). High-growth firms in Sweden 1997–2007. Characteristics and development patterns. Stockholm: The Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A., & Pijnenburg, K. (2013). Business cycles, unemployment and entrepreneurial entry-evidence from Germany. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, T. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C., & Miller, P. (1991a). New fast-growing companies create jobs. Long Range Planning, 241, 96–101. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(91)90029-n.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, C., & Miller, P. (1991b). The performance of new firms in Scotland and the South East, 1980–7. Royal Bank of Scotland Review, 170, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galve, C., & Hernández, A. (2007). Empresas gacela y empresas tortuga en Aragón. Working Paper, 37. Fundación Economía Aragonesa.

  • Glancey, K. (1998). Determinants of growth and profitability in small entrepreneurial firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 4(1), 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henreksson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35, 227–244. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, J.M., Amat, O., Fontrodona, J., & Fontana, I. (1999). Les empreses gasela a Catalunya. Papers d’Economia Industrial, 12. Generalitat de Catalunya.

  • Hoffman, A. N., & Junge, M. (2006). Documenting data on high-growth firms and entrepreneurs across 17 countries. Copenhagen: FORA-The Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority’s Division for Research and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölzl, W., & Friesenbichler, K. (2010). High-growth firms, innovation and the distance to the frontier. Economics Bulletin, 30(2), 1016–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogstra, G. J., & van Dijk, J. (2004). Explaining firm employment growth: does location matter? Small Business Economics, 22, 179–192. doi:10.1023/b:sbej.0000022218.66156.ac.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B. A. (1994). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, J. (2014). Policies to support high growth innovative enterprises. 2014 ERAC Mutual - learning seminar on research and innovation policies. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Levratto, N., Tessier, L., & Zoukiri, M. (2010). The determinants of growth for SMES. A longitudinal study from French manufacturing firm. Working Paper, 28. CNRS-Economix, Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense.

  • López-García, P., & Puente, S. (2012). What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 1029–1041. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9321-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales, F. X., García-Villaverde, P. M., & Parra-Requena, G. (2014). Geographical and cognitive proximity effects on innovation performance in SMEs: a way through knowledge acquisition. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2007). High growth SMEs versus non-high-growth SMEs: a discriminant analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(1), 69–88. doi:10.1080/08985620601002162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2007). Eurostat-OECD Manual on business demography statistics. Paris: European Commission-OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Measuring entrepreneurship: A collection of indicators (2009th ed.). Paris: OECD-Eurostat Entrepreneurship Indicators Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 77–90.

  • Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of urban and regional economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2119–2172). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. (2002). Innovation Processes in Industrial Districts. Venezia: ISCOM Project.

  • Sanchís, J. A., Millán, J. M., Baptista, R., Burke, A., Parker, S. C., & Thurik, A. R. (2015). Good times, bad times: entrepreneurship and the business cycle. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(2), 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santa María, M. J., Fuster, A., & Giner, J. M. (2012). Identification of technological districts: the case of Spain. Sviluppo Locale, 39, 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer, P. (2000). High-growth firms and employment, OECD Science. Technology and Industry Working Papers, 3. Paris: OECD.

  • Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805–821. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sforzi, F. (1992). Importancia cuantitativa de los distritos industriales marshallianos en la economía italiana. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Los distritos industriales y las pequeñas empresas I. Distritos industriales y cooperación interempresarial en Italia (pp. 111–145). Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, E. (2005). The geography of gazelles in The Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(1), 121–127. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00443.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St-Jean, E., Julien, P. A., & Audet, J. (2008). Factors associated with growth changes in ‘gazelles’. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16, 161–188. doi:10.1142/S0218495808000089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J. (1999). The ten percenters. Fast growing SMEs in Great Britain (Fourth report). London: Deloitte & Touche International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaessen, P., & Keeble, D. (1995). Growth-oriented SMEs in unfavourable regional environments. Regional Studies, 29(6), 489–505. doi:10.1080/00343409512331349133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J. (1998). Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond. JIBS Dissertation Series, 3. Jönköping International Business School.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable and helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Miguel Giner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giner, J.M., Santa-María, M.J. & Fuster, A. High-growth firms: does location matter?. Int Entrep Manag J 13, 75–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0392-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0392-9

Keywords

Navigation