Skip to main content
Log in

University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between knowledge spillovers from universities and new business location in high-technology sectors. We focus on the contribution to new business formation through spillovers stemming from three main university outputs: knowledge-based graduates, research activities, and technological knowledge. We construct a new dataset with information on 604 companies and 63 universities in Spain and group the data across 36 geographical areas from 2001 to 2004 (144 observations). After controlling for several traditional cost factors and agglomeration characteristics, we find that university spillovers are relevant in explaining the location of new businesses in high-technology sectors in Spain. Further, our analysis draws attention to the relevance of graduates as the main source of spillovers, while research activities and university technology do not have significant effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Understanding those firm characteristics that benefit from university spillovers is also an important issue. However, we do not review this strand of the literature because we focus on new entrants (new business) in particular. Nevertheless, this particular topic may be relevant in explaining how established firms take advantage of spillovers.

  2. Aerospace (Nace 35.3); pharmaceutical products (24.4); computers and office machinery (30); electronic and telecommunications products (32); scientific instruments (33).

References

  • Abramovsky, L., Harrison, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). University research and the location of business R&D. The Economic Journal, 117(519), C114–C141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., Fitzroy, F. R., & Smith, I. (1999). High technology employment, wages and university R&D spillovers: Evidence from US cities. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arauzo, J. M., Liviano, D., & Martín, M. (2008). New business formation and employment growth: Some evidence for the Spanish manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 30, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36, 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Fritsch, M. (1999). The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38, 949–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., & Warning, S. (2004). University spillovers: Does the kind of science matter? Industry and Innovation, 11, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34, 1113–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bania, N., Eberts, R., & Fogarty, M. (1993). Universities and the start-up of new companies: Can we generalize from route 128 and silicon valley? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, T. (2007). Local knowledge resources and knowledge flows. Industry and Innovation, 14, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1986). Econometrics models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. P., & Paul, C. J. M. (2005). Agglomeration economies and industry location decisions: The impacts of spatial and industrial spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozet, M., Mayer, T., & Mucchielli, J.-L. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeln, J. R., Gottschalk, S., & Rammer, C. (2004). Location decisions of spin-offs from public research institutions. Industry and Innovation, 11, 207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84, 210–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M., & Varga, A. (2003). Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science, 37, 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 30, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: A multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41, 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes, P., Figueiredo, O., & Woodward, D. (2003). A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. (1999). Firm formation and regional spillovers—evidence from Germany. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M., & Banks, B. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other labs on commercial innovations. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B. A., Newbert, S. L., Hasan, I., & Armington, C. (2007). The influence of university R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31, 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, J. (2007). Determinants of localized technology spillovers: Role of regional and industrial attributes. Regional Studies, 41, 995–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathelot, R., & Sillard, P. (2008). The importance of local corporate taxes in business location decisions: Evidence from French micro data. Economic Journal, 118, 499–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. (1994). Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–1990. Regional Studies, 28, 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2001a). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47, 1173–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2001b). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamasy, C., & Heron, R. L. (2008). The geography of firm formation in New Zealand. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2003). Industry/university licensing: Characteristics, concerns and issues from the perspective of the buyer. Journal of Technological Transfer, 28, 207–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga, A. (1998). University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, D., Figueiredo, O., & Guimaraes, P. (2006). Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SEJ2005-08972/ECON) and the Junta de Andalucía (P06-SEJ-02087 and P08-SEJ-03981). Earlier drafts were presented at the 11th European Network on Industrial Policy (EUNIP), San Sebastian (Spain), 10–12 September 2008, and EuroMOT 2008 (International Association for Management of Technology), Nice (France), September 17–19, 2008. The authors express their thanks to colleagues at these conferences for their helpful suggestions. The authors are also very grateful to an anonymous reviewer for constructive and insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Coronado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acosta, M., Coronado, D. & Flores, E. University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence. Small Bus Econ 36, 365–376 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9224-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9224-4

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation