Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of synonymous codon usage in foot-and-mouth disease virus

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Veterinary Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we calculate the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) values and codon usage bias (CUB) values to carry out a comparative analysis of codon usage pattern for open reading frames (ORFs) among 85 samples which belong to all seven serotypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Although the degree of CUB for ORFs is a relatively slight, there is a significant variation for CUB among different serotypes, which is mainly determined by codon usage pattern depending on RSCU. By comparison with RSCU values for all samples, although RSCU values fail to show the relationship of specific-lineage serotype, there are two main genetic populations existing in FMDV, namely (i) serotypes Asia 1, A, C &O; (ii) serotypes SAT 1, 2 & 3. This interesting characteristic may be formed by the mechanism of RNA virus recombination. The analysis of quantitative & qualitative evaluation based on CUB indicates interesting characteristic of codon usage, which suggests that more FMDV genome diversity may exist in specific-lineage serotypes rather than exist randomly. Furthermore, the relationship between amino acids and codon usage pattern indicates that mutation pressure rather than translational selection in nature is the important determinant of the codon usage bias observed. Our work might give some sight into some characteristics of FMDV ORF and some evolutionary information of this virus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Carrillo C, Tulman ER, Delhon G, Lu Z, Carreno A, Vagnozzi A, Kutish GF, Rock DL (2005) Comparative genomics of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol 79, 6487–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo C, Lu Z, Borca MV, Vagnozzi A, Kutish GF, Rock DL (2007) Genetic and phenotypic variation of foot-and-mouth disease virus during serial passages in a natural host. J Virol 81, 11341–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Paul S, Dutta C (2006) Synonymous codon usage in adenoviruses: influence of mutation, selection and protein hydropathy. Virus Res 117, 227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo E (2000) Viruses at the edge of adaptation. Virology 270, 251–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domingo E, Escarmis C, Baranowski E, Ruiz-Jarabo C, Carrillo E, Nunez JJ, Sobrino F (2003) Evolution of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Res 91, 47–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JW, Holland JJ (1999) Mutation rates among RNA viruses. Pro Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 96, 13910–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M (1971) Self organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58, 465–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens WJ, Grant GR (2001) Statisical Methods in Bioinformatics. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh TC, Gupta SK, Majumdar S (2000) Studies on codon usage in Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol 30, 715–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gouy M, Gautier C (1982) Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 10, 7055–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A (1980) Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res 8, r49–r62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Jacobzone M, Mercier R (1981) Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 9, r43–r74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grubman MJ, Baxt B (2004) Foot-and-mouth disease. Clin Mirobiol Rev 17, 465–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu WJ, Zhou T, Ma JM, Sun X, Lu ZH (2004) Analysis of synonymous codon usage in SARS coronavirus and other viruses in the Nidovirales. Virus Res 101, 155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haydon DT, Samuel AR, Knowles NJ (2001) The generation and persistence of genetic variation in foot-and-mouth disease virus. Prev. Vet. Med. 51, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GM, Holmes EC (2003) The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA virus and its evolutionary origin. Virus Res 92, 1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins GM, Pagel M, Gould EA, Zanotto PMdA, Holmes EC (2001) Evolution of base composition and codon usage bias in the genus Flavivirus. J Mol Evol 52, 383–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal Component Analysis, second edition. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

  • Karlin S, Mrázek J (1996) What drives codon chices in human genes? J Mol Biol 262, 459–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King AM, McCahon D, Saunders K, Newman JW, Slade WR, (1985) Multiple sites of recombination within the RNA genome of foot-an-mouth disease virus. Virus Res 3, 373–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein J (2009) Understanding the molecular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Infection Genetics and Evolution 9, 205–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles NJ, Samuel AR (2003) Molcular epidemiology of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Res 91, 65–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lesnik T, Solomovici J, Deana A, Ehrlich R, Reiss C (2000) Ribosome traffic in E. Coli and regulation of gene expression. J Theor Biol 202, 175–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DB, Whittome B (2000) Codon usage in nucleopolyhedroviruses. J Gen Virol 81, 2313–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Rogers N, Mcclellan DA, Crandall KA (2008) The evolution of foot-and-mouth disease virus: Impacts of recombination and selection. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 8, 786–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd AT, Sharp PM (1992) Evolution of codon usage patterns: the extent and nature of divergence between Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 20, 5289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar S, Grupta SK, Sundararaj VS, Ghosh TC (1999) Compositional correlation studies among the three different codon position in 12 bacterial genomes. Biochem Biophys Commun 266, 66–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM (1979) Multivariate analysis. Academic press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin A, Bertranpetit J, Oliver JL (1989) Variation in G+C content and codon choice: differences among synonymous codon groups in vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 6181–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason PW, Grubman MJ, Barry B (2003) Molecular basis of pathogenesis of FMDV. Virus Res 91, 9–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCahon D, King AM, Roe DS, Slade WR, Newman JW, Cleary AM (1985) Isolation and biochemical characterization of intertypic recombinants of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Virus Res 3, 87–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JFE, Brown F (1997) Foot-and-mouth disease virus and poliovirus particles contain proteins of the replication complex. J Virol 71, 7657–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno H, Sakai H, Washio T, Tomita M (2001) Preferential usage of some minor codons in bacteria. Gene 276, 107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pariente N, Airaksinen A, Domingo E (2003) Mutagenesis versus inhibition in the efficiency of extinction of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol 77, 7131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelton LA, Parrish CR, Holmes EC (2006) Evolutionary basis of codon usage and nucleotide composition bias in vertebrate DNA viruses. J Mol Evol 62, 551–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM, Li W H (1986) Codon usage in regulatory genes in Escherichia coli does not reflect selection for ‘rare’ codons. Nucleic Acids Res 14, 7737–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp PM, Tuohy TM, Mosurski KR (1986) Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 14, 5125–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh C, Hemadri D, Sanyal A (2002) Evidence of recombination in the capsid-coding region of type A foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Gen Virol 83, 2455–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson V, Taylor P, Desselberger U (1988) Crossover regions in foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) recombinants correspond to region of high load secondary structure. Arch Virol 102, 131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie T, Ding D, Tao X, Dafu D (1998) The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure. FEBS Lett 434, 93–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou T, Gu WJ, Ma JM, Sun X, Lu ZH (2005) Analysis of synonymous codon usage in H5N1 virus and other influenza A viruses. Biosystems 81, 77–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou T, Sun X, Lu ZH (2006) Synonymous codon usage in environmental Chlamydia UWE25 reflects an evolution divergence from pathogenic chlamydiae. Gene 368, 117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is a part of Projection 0801NKDA034 supported by Science and Technology Key Projection of Gansu province of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong-Sheng Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, JH., Zhang, J., Chen, HT. et al. Analysis of synonymous codon usage in foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vet Res Commun 34, 393–404 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-010-9359-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-010-9359-4

Keywords

Navigation