Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A geomorphological mapping approach for the assessment of seabed geohazards and risk

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Marine Geophysical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploration and development of offshore hydrocarbon resources has advanced into remote deepwater regions over the last decade and poses significant technical challenges for the design and installation of wells and facilities at extreme water depths. Seafloor and shallow subsurface processes and conditions in these areas are complex and generally poorly understood, and the geohazards to development are larger scale and fundamentally different to those encountered onshore; consequently the geohazard risk to deepwater development projects is potentially significant and requires careful evaluation and mitigation during the front-end planning and engineering design stages of projects. There are no established industry standards or methods for the assessment of geohazards and engineering-quality geophysical data at the scale of development. The paper describes an integrated and systematic map-based approach for the assessment and mitigation of seabed geohazards and risk to proposed deepwater development. The approach employs a multi-disciplinary team working with engineering-quality field calibrated data to accurately map and assess seafloor ground conditions and ensure that development proposals are not exposed to intolerable geohazard risk. The approach taken is very similar to the practice of establishing geological models for land-based engineering projects, in which the complete geological history of the site is used to characterise and predict the performance of the ground. Such an approach is routine for major projects on land but so far does not seem to be common practice in the offshore industry. The paper illustrates the seafloor geomophological mapping approach developed. The products are being used to optimise development layouts to avoid geohazards where possible and to support site-specific engineering design of facilities based on a detailed understanding of the potential geohazard loadings and associated risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brunsden D (2002) The fifth glossop lecture. Geomorphological roulette for engineers and planners: some insights into an old game. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 35:101–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsden D, Jones DKC (1972) The morphology of degraded landslide slopes in South West Dorset. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 5:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryn P, Berg K, Forsberg CF, Solheim A, Kvalstad TJ (2005) Explaining the storegga slide. Mar Pet Geol 22:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauchon-Voyer G, Locat J, St-Onge G (2008) Late-Quaternary morpho-sedimentology and submarine mass movements of the Betsiamites area, Lower St. Lawrence Estuary, Quebec, Canada. Mar Geol 251:233–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke RU, Doornkamp JC (1990) Geomorphology in environmental management. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans TG, Moore R, Usher N (2007) Management of geotechnical and geohazard risks in the west nile delta. 6th international conference, offshore site investigation and geotechnics: confronting new challenges and sharing knowledge, London

  • Gee MJR, Uy HS, Warren J, Morley CK, Lambiase JJ (2007) The Brunei slide: a giant submarine landslide on the North West Borneo Margin revealed by 3D seismic data. Mar Geol 246:9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton MA, Lee HJ (1996) Submarine landslides. Rev Geophys 34(1):33–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhnerbach V, Masson DG (2004) Landslides in the North Atlantic and its adjacent seas: an analysis of their morphology, setting and behaviour. Mar Geol 213(2004):343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanjean P, Liedtke E, Clukey EC, Hampson K, Evans TG (2005) ‘An operator’s perspective on offshore risk assessment and geotechnical design in geohazard-prone areas’, Frontiers in offshore geotechnic: ISFOG 2005––Gourvenec and Cassidy (eds)

  • Kvalstad TJ (2007) ‘What is the current “best practice” in offshore geohazard investigations? A state-of-the -art review’, OTC 18545, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 30 April–3 May 2007

  • Locat J (2001) Instabilities along ocean margins: a geomorphological and geotechnical perspective. Mar Pet Geol 18:503–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locat J, Lee HJ (2002) Submarine landslides: advances and challenges. Can Geotech J 39(1):193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson DG, Harbitz CB, Wynn RB, Pedersen G, Løvholt F (2006) Submarine landslides: processes, triggers and hazard prediction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 364:2009–2039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo BG, Pratson LF, Orange DL (2000) Submarine landslide geomorphology, US continental slope. Mar Geol 169:103–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micallef A, Masson DG, Berndt C, Stow DAV (2009) Development and mass movement processes of the north-eastern Storegga Slide. Quat Sci Rev 28:433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore R, Usher N, Evans TG (2007) Integrated multidisciplinary assessment of West Nile Delta geohazards. 6th international conference, offshore site investigation and geotechnics: confronting new challenges and sharing knowledge, London, 2007

  • Nittrouer CA, Kravitz JH (1996) STRATAFORM: a program to study the creation and interpretation of sedimentary strata on continental margins. Oceanography 9:146–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Posamentier HW (2000) Seismic stratigraphy into the next millennium; a focus on 3D seismic data, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, April 16–19, A118

  • Prior DB, Hooper JR (1999) Sea floor engineering geomorphology: recent achievements and future directions. Geomorphology 31:411–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savigear RAG (1965) A technique of morphological mapping. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 53:514–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Brink US, Geist EL, Andrews BD (2006) Size distribution of submarine landslides and its implications to tsunami hazard in Puerto Rico. Geophys Res Lett 33(L11307):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Twichell DC, Chaytor JD, Ten Brink US, Buczkowski B (2009) Morphology of late Quaternary submarine landslides along the US Atlantic continental margin. Mar Geol 264(2009):4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to colleagues in Halcrow and Fugro for their assistance and collaboration in developing the integrated mapping approach presented in this paper. The authors are grateful for the comments of Prof Denys Brunsden on the initial draft of the paper. We gratefully acknowledge the comments of the editor and reviewers on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayle Hough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hough, G., Green, J., Fish, P. et al. A geomorphological mapping approach for the assessment of seabed geohazards and risk. Mar Geophys Res 32, 151–162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-010-9111-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11001-010-9111-z

Keywords

Navigation