Abstract
This article describes the process of a learning study conducted in technology education in a Swedish preschool class. The learning study method used in this study is a collaborative method, where researchers and teachers work together as a team concerning teaching and learning about a specific learning object. The object of learning in this study concerns strong constructions and framed structures. This article describes how this learning study was conducted and discusses reflections made during the process. Furthermore, we discuss how the learning study method could be implemented in technology education using hands-on material. Some of the results point to problems of delimiting an object of learning in technology education using hands-on material and the complexity in the relation between content and context in learning. The results also show benefits from the collaborative method where researchers and teachers work together with regards to specific learning content in the technology classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We used a Swedish version of this folk tale printed in a book by Adolfsson and Friberger (2008).
References
Adolfsson, E., & Friberger, A. (2008). Bockarna bruse. Stockholm: Bonnier Carlsen.
Bengtsson, J. (Ed.). (2005). Med livsvärlden som grund: Bidrag till utvecklandet av en livsvärldsfenomenologisk ansats i pedagogisk forskning (2nd ed.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Björkholm, E. (2013). Exploring the capability of evaluating technical solutions: A collaborative study into the primary technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-013-9240-1.
Bjurulf, V. (2008). Teknikämnets gestaltningar: En studie av lärares arbete med skolämnet teknik. (Karlstad University Studies, No. 2008:29). Dissertation, Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Bjurulf, V. (2011). Teknikdidaktik. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Dahlin, B. (2007). Enriching the theoretical horizons of phenomenography, variation theory, and learning studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 327–346.
Gustavsson, L. (2008). Att bli bättre lärare: Hur undervisningsinnehållets behandling blir till samtalsämne lärare emellan. (Umeå universitet: Doktorsavhandlingar inom den nationella forskarskolan i pedagogiskt arbete, no. 12). Dissertation, Umeå: Umeå University.
Hagberg, J., & Hultén, M. (2005). Skolans undervisning och elevers lärande i teknik—svensk forskning i internationell kontext. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Haglund, J., & Jeppsson, F. (2012). Using self-generated analogies in teaching of thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 898–921.
Hedkvist Manninen, A. (2010). Ett nytt pedagogiskt material! 4DFrame, hur kan man arbeta praktiskt med det? Södertörns högskola.
Heidegger, M. (1927/2004). Varat och tiden (R. Matz Trans.). Göteborg: Daidalos.
Hope, G. (2007). Unpacking a research activity: What was hidden in the panda’s suitcase? In E. W. L. Norman, & D. Spendlove (Eds.), The design and technology association international research conference 2007, University of Wolverhampton, Telford campus, 4,5,6 July. (pp. 37–41). Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.
Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. (2011). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9174-4.
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kilbrink, N. (2008). Legorobotar i skolan: Elevers uppfattningar av lärandeobjekt och problemlösningsstrategier (Karlstad University Studies, No. 2008:7). Licentiate thesis, Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Kilbrink, N. (2013). Lära för framtiden: Transfer i teknisk yrkesutbildning (Karlstad University studies, No. 2013:4). Dissertation, Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Kullberg, A. (2010). What is taught and what is learned: Professional insights gained and shared by teachers of mathematics (Göteborg studies in educational sciences, No. 293) Dissertation, Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
Lewis, T. (2009). Creativity in technology education: Providing children with glimpses of their inventive potential. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 255–268.
Ling, L. M., & Marton, F. (2012). Towards a science of the art of teaching: Using variation theory as a guiding principle of pedagogical design. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(1), 7–22.
Lo, M. (2009). The development of the learning study approach in classroom research in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 24(1), 165–184.
Marton, F., & Ling, L. M. (2007). Learning from “the learning study”. Tidskrift för lärarutbildning och forskning, 14(1), s 31–34.
Marton, F., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (2002). What matters?: Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning. (Göteborg studies in educational sciences, no. 181). Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/2002). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith Trans.). London: Routledge.
Middleton, H. (2005). Creative thinking, values and design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 61–71.
Mossberg Schüllerqvist, I., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2011). Mellan teori och praktik: Svensklärares teoriomsättning om text, läsare och läsning. Lärare Som Praktiker Och Forskare, 5, 39–48.
Pang, M. F., & Ling, L. M. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionality and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science, 40(3), 589–606.
Papert, S. (1995). Hur gör giraffen när den sover: Skolan, datorn och kunskapsprocessen (U. Jakobsson Trans.). Gothenburg: Daidalos.
Ritz, J. M., & Martin, G. (2013). Research needs for technology education: An international perspective. International Journal of Technology and Design Education., 40(3), 767–783.
Rovio-Johansson, A. (1999). Being good at teaching: Exploring different ways of handling the same subject in higher education (Göteborg studies in educational sciences, No. 140). Dissertation, Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
Runesson, U. (1999). Variationens pedagogik: Skilda sätt att behandla ett matematiskt innehåll (Göteborg studies in educational sciences, No. 129). Dissertation, Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
Sherman, T. M., Sanders, M., & Kwon, H. (2010). Teaching in middle school technology education: A review of recent practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 367–379.
Sjöberg, S. (2005). Naturvetenskap som allmänbildning: En kritisk ämnesdidaktik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Skolverket. (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet, Lgr11. Stockholm: Skolverket.
van Bommel, J. (2012). Improving teaching, improving learning, improving as a teacher (Karlstad University Studies, No. 2012:31). Dissertation, Karlstad: Karlstad University.
Vetenskapsrådet. (2002). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Vikström, A. (2005). Ett frö för lärande: En variationsteoretisk studie av undervisning och lärande i grundskolans biologi (Luleå tekniska universitet, No. 14). Dissertation, Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
Wernberg, A. (2009). Vad elever förväntas lära sig, vad görs möjligt för dem att lära och vad de faktiskt lär sig under lektionerna. (Umeå universitet: Doktorsavhandlingar inom den nationella forskarskolan i pedagogiskt arbete, no. 20). Dissertation, Umeå: Umeå University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Bjurulf is now employed by The Swedish National Agency for Education, Stockholm, but was at the time of data collection employed by Karlstad University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilbrink, N., Bjurulf, V., Blomberg, I. et al. Learning specific content in technology education: learning study as a collaborative method in Swedish preschool class using hands-on material. Int J Technol Des Educ 24, 241–259 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9258-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9258-4