Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inuit Legends, Oral Histories, Art, and Science in the Collaborative Development of Lessons that Foster Two-Way Learning: The Return of the Sun in Nunavut

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the development of a science unit for Nunavut students and my collaboration with Louise Uyarak, an early years teacher and a graduate of Arctic College’s teacher education program. The unit addresses light outcomes in the Canadian Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes, K12. More importantly, it incorporates aspirations of the local community, the District Education Authority, and the Nunavut government for bi-cultural education in science: an education that develops knowledge in and about science and knowledge passed on to the Inuit by their ancestors. Components of lessons are presented and discussed in the context of how Louise and I worked together to develop a resource that would embody the fundamental nature of culturally responsive teaching and “two-way” science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The project, “Honouring Local Aspirations: Beaufort Education Council (NWT) and Nunavut Pilot Studies” was a 5 year research project implemented under the umbrella of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Research, Youth, Science Teaching and Learning (CRYSTAL), which was funded by Canada’s Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC).

  2. The Science Curriculum Implementation Questionnaire (Lewthwaite 2001) was used in the evaluation of factors influencing science program delivery at each school. This is a comprehensive, validated 7-scale, forty-nine item questionnaire that was developed with the intent of gauging a teacher’s perceptions of environmental and personal attributes identified as impediments to science program delivery: resource adequacy, time, school ethos, professional support, science knowledge, professional adequacy, and professional interest and motivation (Lewthwaite 2000).

  3. Inuuqatigiit: The Curriculum from the Inuit Perspective (Northwest Territories Department of Education, Culture, and Employment 1996) summarizes “what Inuit say is important for children now and for the future” (i.e., “maintain strengthen, recall and enhance Inuit language and culture in the community and the school; enhance unity within Inuit groups; create a link between the past and the present; encourage the practice of Inuit values and beliefs; and encourage pride in Inuit identity to enhance personal identity,” p. 5). Inuuqatigiit also includes examples of how best to promote these goals.

  4. At the moment, a science curriculum for Nunavut has not been written. Teachers in the three schools either follow a 3-year plan of school wide themes as endorsed by the former Baffin Divisional Board of Education (e.g., September, water; October, polar bears; November, ice/snow; December, traditional games and recreation) or align their teaching with the guidelines set by Alberta, the Northwest Territories, or the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.

  5. Similar to a career Planning for Alternative Tomorrows with Hope (PATHING) model in which individuals identify where they are headed and how the organization in which they work can help them to gain the skills, knowledge, and abilities to get there. The individual employee, however, is responsible for his or her own professional development.

  6. Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit is literally translated as “that which has long been known by Inuit” (Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (2007, June 5). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inuit_Qaujimajatuqangit&oldid=136012636

  7. The Igloolik Oral History Project began in 1986. It was organized by the Igloolik elders in cooperation with the Igloolik Research Centre and captured on audio tape the knowledge and experiences of elders. These audio tapes have been translated and transcribed into English and are held in the archives of the Inullariit Society, Igloolik Research Centre, Igloolik, Nunavut.

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. (2005). Stories from the field: Experiences and advice from the Rekindling Traditions team. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://usask.ca/education/ccstu/stories.html.

  • Annahatak, B. (1994). Quality education for Inuit today? Cultural strengths, new things, and working out the unknowns: A story by an Inuk. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(2), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asoko, H. (2002). Developing conceptual understanding in primary science. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, A. (2002). First steps: Nunavut struggles for self-determination. The Independent: A Journal for the Princeton Community, Article 05. Retrieved May 20, 2007, from http://princetonindependent.com/issue11.02/item5.html.

  • Baskerville, D. (2009). Navigating the unfamiliar in a quest towards culturally responsive pedagogy in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 461–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., Epp, J. R., & Moller, H. (2006). The predictable influences of culture clash, current practice, and colonialism on punctuality, attendance, and achievement in Nunavut schools. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 29(2), 182–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 39–52). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1996). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Toronto, ON: Council of Ministers of Education.

  • DeMerchant, R. V. (2000). Inuit qaujimajatuqangit (IQ): A framework for curriculum in Nunavut. Whitehorse: Arctic Science 2000—Crossing Borders: Science and Community.

  • Fleer, M. (1997). Science, technology and culture: Supporting multiple world views in curriculum design. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 43(3), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, M. (1999). The scope of multicultural education. Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/multicultural/hanley.htm.

  • Harris, S. (1990). Two way Aboriginal schooling: Education and cultural survival. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. (2008). The tale of two Noras: How a Yup’ik middle schooler was differently constructed as a math learner. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education: An International Journal, 2(2), 90–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegede, O. J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappianaq, G. (1995). Transcription and English translation of interview, IE-327. The Igloolik Oral History Project.

  • Lewthwaite, B. E. (2000). Implementing science in the New Zealand curriculum: How teachers see the problems. In G. Haisman (Ed.), Exploring issues in science education (pp. 11–23). Wellington: Ministry of Education, Research and Curriculum Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B. E. (2001). The development, validation and application of a primary science curriculum implementation questionnaire. Unpublished ScEdD Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth. http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20030717.155648/.

  • Lewthwaite, B., & McMillan, B. (2007). Combining the views of both worlds: Perceived constraints and contributors to achieving aspirations for science education in Qikiqtani. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7, 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, B., McMillan, B., Renaud, R., Hainnu, R., & MacDonald, C. (2010). Combining the views of “both worlds”: Science education in Nunavut, Piqusiit tamainik katisugit. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 98, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loving, C., & Ortiz de Montellano, B. (2003). Good versus bad culturally relevant science avoiding the pitfalls. In S. M. Hines (Ed.), Multicultural science education: Theory, practice, and promise (pp. 147–166). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, E., Waiti, P., & Bell, B. (1992). Language, culture and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 579–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. P., & Bentley, M. L. (2006). Beyond the “decorated landscapes” of educational reform: Toward landscapes of pluralism in science education. Science Education, 91(2), 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Territories Department of Education, Culture and Employment. (1996). Inuuqatigiit: The curriculum from the Inuit perspective. Yellowknife, NT: Northwest Territories Department of Education, Culture and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunavut Department of Education. (2005). Nunavut education act (K-12): 2005 public consultations. Iqaluit, NU: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunavut Department of Education. (2007). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Education framework for Nunavut curriculum. Iquluit, NU: Nunavut Department of Education, Curriculum and School Services Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunavut Department of Education, Curriculum and School Services. (2004). EL2: The junior secondary handbook for Nunavut schools. Arviat, NU: Department of Education, Curriculum and School Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, D. (2001). Qallunology: A pedagogy for the oppressor. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, D. (2011). Forty years of struggle and still no right to Inuit education in Nunavut. Interchange, 42(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, D., & Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waiti, P. & Hipkins, R. (2002). Cultural issues that challenge traditional science teaching. Retrieved January 24, 2007, from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/12618.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara A. McMillan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMillan, B.A. Inuit Legends, Oral Histories, Art, and Science in the Collaborative Development of Lessons that Foster Two-Way Learning: The Return of the Sun in Nunavut. Interchange 43, 129–145 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9189-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9189-8

Keywords

Navigation