Skip to main content
Log in

Sheltering effect and snow deposition in arrays of vertical pillars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to study of the efficiency of windbreaks composed by three dimensional arrays of pillars and used for snow deposition. Windbreaks and snow fences are commonly designed as two dimensional porous fences. This gives good efficiency, but might in some cases be regarded as architecturally boring. It also represents an obstruction to human traffic, and is sometimes difficult to integrate in the landscape architecture. The air flow around three different geometrical configurations of pillars is analyzed. The three arrangements include four and six rows of pillars and a sculptural representation of a Saami (indigenous people of northern Scandinavia) labyrinth. The numerical simulations of wind and snow deposition show that the flow pattern in the arrays is not very sensitive to wind speed. The four row array seems to produce snow drifts which are longer, and have the maximum height located further downwind than a common 50 % porous snow fence. The results of the windbreak, inspired by the Saami labyrinth, show that there is a large variation of the friction velocity within the labyrinth. Based on the results, such arrangement can be regarded as an alternative for landscape architects aiming to shelter a specific area. However, optimisation studies on internal structure of the size, orientation and shape of the pillars should be performed based on local wind climate. The methods outlined here seems suitable for such studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heisler GM, DeWalle DR (1988) Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22–23:41–69

  2. Sudmeyer RA, Scott PR (2002) Characterisation of a windbreak system on the south coast of Western Australia. 1. Microclimate and wind erosion. Aust J Exp Agric 42:703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sturrock JW (1969) Aerodynamic studies of shelterbelts in New Zealand. 1. Low to medium height shelterbelts in Mid-Canterbury. N Z J Sci 12:754–776

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loeffer AE, Gordon AM, Gillespie TJ (1992) Optical porosity and windspeed reduction by coniferous windbreaks in Southern Ontario. Agrofor Syst 17:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang H, Brandle JR, Meyer GE, Hodges L (1995) The relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter. Agrofor Syst 32:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou XH, Brandle JR, Mize CW, Takle ES (2004) Three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a tree shelterbelt: Definition, characterization and working models. Agrofor Syst 63:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna SR, Tehranian S, Carissimo B, Macdonald RW, Lohner R (2002) Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 36:5067–5079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tabler RD (1994) Design guidelines for the control of blowing and drifting snow. SHRP H-381, US National Research Council

  9. Tabler RD (2006) Three-dimensional roughness elements for snow retention. FHWA-WY- 06/04F, Wyoming Department of Transportation

  10. Thiis TK, Gjessing Y (1999) Large-scale measurements of snowdrifts around flat-roofed and single-pitch-roofed buildings. Cold Reg Sci Technol 30:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beyers JHM, Sundsbø PA, Harms TM (2004) Numerical simulation of three-dimensional, transient snow drifting around a cube. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 92:725–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tominaga Y, Okaze T, Mochida A (2011) CFD modeling of snowdrift around a building: an overview of models and evaluation of a new approach. Build Environ 46:899–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naaim M, Naaim-Bouvet F, Martinez H (1998) Numerical simulation of drifting snow: erosion and deposition models. Ann Glaciol 26:191–196

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale CG (1992) Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Phys Fluids A 4:1510–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katul GG, Mahrt L, Poggi D, Sanz C (2004) One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Bound-Lay Meteorol 113:81–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mellor M, Fellers G (1986) Concentration and flux of wind-blown snow. US Army Corps of Engineers, special report 86–11

  18. Mellor M (1965) Blowing snow. U.S. Army Materiel Command, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, New Hampshire

  19. Kind PJ (1981) Snowdrifting, Handbook of snow. In: Gray DM, Male H (eds) Principles, processes, management and use. Pergamon Press, Toronto, pp 338–359

    Google Scholar 

  20. ANSYS CFX-Solver Modeling Guide

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Thiis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiis, T., Ferreira, A.D. Sheltering effect and snow deposition in arrays of vertical pillars. Environ Fluid Mech 15, 27–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9356-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-014-9356-1

Keywords

Navigation