Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Windspeed reduction in shelter is generally expressed relatively and is usually assumed to be independent of open windspeed. The purpose of this study was to re-examine the relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter using windspeeds and wind directions measured for two windbreak systems at various distances from the windbreaks and with three windbreak porosities. Optical windbreak porosities were estimated from digitized color photographs using an intelligent (trainable) image processing program. Relative windspeed reduction in shelter was found to be related to the open windspeed. There existed a threshold windspeed at approximately 5 m s−1, below which relative windspeed reduction varied but generally decreased as the open windspeed increased. Above the threshold windspeed, open windspeed did not have an effect on relative windspeed reduction in the sheltered zone. Using the threshold windspeed reduction, the authors propose an index to evaluate the effectiveness of a windbreak for the overal windspeed protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aono M and Kunii TL (1984) Botanical tree image generation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Appl 5: 10–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer NW (1989) Shelterbelt and windbreaks in the Great Plains. J For 87(4): 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli J, Gregory JM and Abtew W (1989) Wind barriers: a reevaluation of height, spacing, and porosity. Trans ASAE 32: 2023–2027

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hintz DL and Sturrock JW (eds) (1988) Windbreak Technology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 598 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KW and Rosenberg NJ (1971, 1972) Shelter-effects on microclimate, growth and water use by irrigated sugar beets in the Great Plains. Agric Meteorol 9: 241–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Caborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and Microclimate. For Comm Bull No 29, Edingurg, 135 pp

  • Cao X (1985) Field Windbreaks, China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 645 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper N and Smith H (1981) Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 709 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler GM and DeWalle DR (1988) Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 41–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen LJ, Skidmore EL, Miller PL and Kipp JE (1981) Simulation of effect of wind barriers on airflow. Trans ASAE 24: 1002–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M (1961) Shelter effect: Investigation into the Aerodynamics of Shelter and its Effects on Climate and Crops. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, 263 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny WA (1987) A method for estimating windbreak porosity using digitized photographic silhouettes. Agric For Meteorol 39: 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstantinov AR and Struzer LR (1969) Shelterbelts and Crop Yields. US Office of Technical Services, Washington, DC, TT68-50370. Translated by Israel Program for Sci Translations Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler AE (1990) Using optical porosity to evaluate the shelter effectiveness of windbreaks in southern Ontario. Master's Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler AE, Gordon AM and Gillespie TJ (1992) Optical porosity and windspeed reduction by coniferous windbreaks in southern Ontario. Agrofor Syst 17: 119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • mcNaughton KG (1988) Effects of windbreaks on turbulent transport and microclimate. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22/23: 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton KG (1989) Micrometeorology of shelter belts and forest edges. Phil Trans R Soc London B 324: 351–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller DR, Rosenberg NJ and Bagley WT (1975) Wind reduction by a highly permeable tree shelterbelt. Agric Meteorol 14: 321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DR, Lawton JH, Dodson MM and Williamson MH (1985) Fractal dimension of the vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314: 731–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nägeli WV (1965) Über die Windverhaltnisse im Bereich gestaffelter Windschutzstreifen. Mitt Schweiz Anstalt 41: 221–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa Y and Diosey PG (1980) Surface roughness and thermal stratification effects on the flow behind a two-dimensional fence-I. field study. Atmos Environ 14: 1301–1308

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate EJ (1971) The aerodynamics of shelter belts. Agric Meteorol 8: 203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price TV and Osborne CF (1990) Computer imaging and its application to some problems in agriculture and plant science. Critical Rev Plant Sci 9: 235–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine JK and Stevenson DC (1977) Wind protection by model fences in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. J Int Aero 2: 159–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg NJ, Blad BL and Verma SB (1983) Microclimate: The Biological Environment. John Wiley and Sons, New York 495 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I (1972) Windbreak drag calculated from the horizontal velocity field. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 3: 87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I (1975) Atmospheric-stability effect on windbreak shelter and drag. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 8: 383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I and Sagi R (1971, 1972) Drag on a windbreak in two-dimensional flow. Agric Meteorol 9: 323–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Z, Meng P, Zhang H, Lu G, Zhou H, Hong S, Liu Y and Zhang T (1987) A study on the effect of windbreaks on meteorological factors and wheat yield in Heilonggang reaches. In: Song Z (ed) A Collection of Papers on Forest Meteorology in China, pp 122–129. Meteorology Publishing House, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturrock JW (1969) Aerodynamic studies of shelterbelts in New Zealand-1 low to medium height shelterbelts in mid-Canterbury. New Zealand J Sci 12: 754–776

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eimern J, Karschon R, Razumova LA and Robertson GW (1964) Windbreaks and shelterbelts. WMO Tech Note No 59, 188 pp

  • Vlcek J and Cheung E (1986) Fractal analysis of leaf shapes. Can J For Res 16: 124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei L, Jiang A and Zhang Y (1987) On the effective protecting distance of shelterbelts. Kexue Tongbao (Sciences Reports) 32: 605–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen K-J and Wang Y-S (1991) The statistical analysis of shelterbelt structure and windproof efficiency. Agric For Meteorol 53: 257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong D (1981) Microclimate and Crop Microclimate. China Agriculture Publishing House, Beijing, 160 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeide B and Pfeifer P (1991) A method for estimation of fractal dimension of tree crowns. For Sci 37: 1253–1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Brandle JR, Meyer GE and Hodges L (1995) A model to evaluate windbreak protection efficiency. Agroforestry Systems 29: 191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Xiao L, Zhao T and Zhang H (1995) Windbreaks for Agriculture. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 400 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published as Journal Series No. 10815 of the Agricultural Research Division, University of Nebraska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Brandle, J.R., Meyer, G.E. et al. The relationship between open windspeed and windspeed reduction in shelter. Agroforest Syst 32, 297–311 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711717

Key words

Navigation