Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soil extracellular enzyme activities correspond with abiotic factors more than fungal community composition

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil extracellular enzymes are the proximal drivers of decomposition. However, the relative influence of climate, soil nutrients and edaphic factors compared to microbial community composition on extracellular enzyme activities (EEA) is poorly resolved. Determining the relative effects of these factors on soil EEA is critical since changes in climate and microbial species composition may have large impacts on decomposition. We measured EEA from five sites during the growing season in March and 17 sites during the dry season in July throughout southern California and simultaneously collected data on climate, soil nutrients, soil edaphic factors and fungal community composition. The concentration of carbon and nitrogen in the soil and soil pH were most related to hydrolytic EEA. Conversely, oxidative EEA was mostly related to mean annual precipitation. Fungal community composition was not correlated with EEA at the species, genus, family or order levels. The hyphal length of fungi was correlated with EEA during the growing season while relative abundance of taxa within fungal phyla, in particular Chytridiomycota, was correlated with the EEA of beta-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, acid phosphatase and beta-xylosidase in the dry season. Overall, in the dry season, 35.3 % of the variation in all enzyme activities was accounted for by abiotic variables, while fungal composition accounted for 27.4 %. Because global change is expected to alter precipitation regimes and increase nitrogen deposition in soils, EEA may be affected, with consequences for decomposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison S, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37(5):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Lebauer DS, Ofrecio MR, Reyes R, Ta A-M, Tran TM (2009) Low levels of nitrogen addition stimulate decomposition by boreal forest fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 41(2):293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amend AS, Seifert KA, Bruns TD (2010) Quantifying microbial communities with 454 pyrosequencing: does read abundance count? Mol Ecol 19(24):5555–5565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Averill C, Finzi A (2011) Plant regulation of microbial enzyme production in situ. Soil Biol Biochem 43(12):2457–2460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldrian P (2008) Enzymes of saprotrophic basidiomycetes, vol Chapter 2, Vol 28., British mycological society symposia seriesElsevier, Amsterdam, pp 19–41

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldrian P, Kolarik M, Stursova M, Kopecky J, Valaskova V, Vetrovsky T, Zifcakova L, Snajdr J, Ridl J, Vlcek C, Voriskova J (2012) Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J 6(2):248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerner REJ, Brinkman JA, Smith A (2005) Seasonal variations in enzyme activity and organic carbon in soil of a burned and unburned hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 37(8):1419–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockett BFT, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ (2012) Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol Biochem 44(1):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JKM, Hovmoeller MS (2002) Aerial dispersal of pathogens on the global and continental scales and its impact on plant disease. Science 297:537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundett M, Piche Y, Peterson R (1984) A new method for observing the morphology of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Can J Bot 62:2128–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke DJ, Weintraub MN, Hewins CR, Kalisz S (2011) Relationship between soil enzyme activities, nutrient cycling and soil fungal communities in a northern hardwood forest. Soil Biol Biochem 43(4):795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns RG (1978) Soil enzymes. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso JG, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Knight R (2010a) PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26(2):266–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010b) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Booker FL, Tu C, Burkey KO, Zhou L, Shew HD, Rufty TW, Hu S (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase organic carbon decomposition under elevated CO2. Science 337(6098):1084–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JH, Kang H, Park SS (2009) Comparison of enzyme activities in vegetated and nonvegetated sediments. J Environ Eng 135(5):299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeForest J, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (2004) Atmospheric nitrate deposition, microbial community composition, and enzyme activity in northern hardwood forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(1):132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • DeForest J, Smemo K, Burke D, Elliott H, Becker J (2012) Soil microbial responses to elevated phosphorus and pH in acidic temperate deciduous forests. Biogeochemistry 109(1):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JE, Darby BA, Giasson MA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP, Finzi AC (2012) Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exclusion—insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest. Biogeosci Discuss 9(6):6899–6945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn OJ (1961) Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc 56:52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19):2460–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenn M, Baron J, Allen E, Rueth H, Nydick K, Geiser L, Bowman W, Sickman J, Meixner T, Johnson D, Neitlich P (2003) Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. BioSci 53(4):404–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Calvino D, Rousk J, Brookes PC, Baath E (2011) Bacterial pH-optima for growth track soil pH, but are higher than expected at low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 43(7):1569–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WT Jr, Johanson JB (1982) Effect of pH on enzyme stability in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 14(5):433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey SD, Knorr M, Parrent JL, Simpson RT (2004) Chronic nitrogen enrichment affects the structure and function of the soil microbial community in temperate hardwood and pine forests. For Ecol Manag 196(1):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German DP, Marcelo KRB, Stone MM, Allison SD (2012) The Michaelis–Menten kinetics of soil extracellular enzymes in response to temperature: a cross-latitudinal study. Glob Change Biol 18(4):1468–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattenschwiler S, Tiunov A, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry HAL, Juarez JD, Field CB, Vitousek PM (2005) Interactive effects of elevated CO2, N deposition and climate change on extracellular enzyme activity and soil density fractionation in a California annual grassland. Glob Change Biol 11(10):1808–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson BD (1994) Soil organic matter and available water capacity. J Soil Water Conserv 49(2):189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis, summary for policymaders

  • Joergensen RG, Wichern F (2008) Quantitative assessment of the fungal contribution to microbial tissue in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40(12):2977–2991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlin SN, Hawkes CV, Treseder KK (2011) Global diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 43(11):2294–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom M (2003) Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 35(7):895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauber CL, Strickland MS, Bradford MA, Fierer N (2008) The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biol Biochem 40(9):2407–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leprince F, Quiquampoix H (1996) Extracellular enzyme activity in soil: effect of pH and ionic strength on the interaction with montmorillonite of two acid phosphatases secreted by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum. Eur J Soil Sci 47(4):511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longcore JE, Pessier AP, Nichols DK (1999) Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis gen. et sp. nov., a Chytrid pathogenic to amphibians. Mycologia 91(2):219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DL, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol Monogr 76(2):151–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker MA (1985) Local population differentiation for compatibility in an annual legume and its host-specific fungal pathogen. Evolution 39(4):713–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker SS, Schimel JP (2011) Soil nitrogen transformations differ between the summer and growing season in California grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 48(2):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peay KG, Schubert MG, Nguyen NH, Bruns TD (2012) Measuring ectomycorrhizal fungal dispersal: macroecological patterns driven by microscopic propagules. Mol Ecol 16:4122–4136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder J, Knight R (2010) Rapidly denoising pyrosequencing amplicon reads by exploiting rank-abundance distributions. Nat Methods 7(9):668–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinkes ZL, Weintraub MN, DeForest JL, Moorhead DL (2011) Microbial substrate preference and community dynamics during decomposition of Acer saccharum. Fungal Ecol 4(6):396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe C, Sollins P (1999) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousk J, Brookes PC, Baath E (2009) Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. App Environ Microbiol 75(6):1589–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N (2010) Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4(10):1340–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR (2002) The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biol Biochem 34(9):1309–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider T, Gerrits B, Gassmann R, Schmid E, Gessner MO, Richter A, Battin T, Eberl L, Riedel K (2010) Proteome analysis of fungal and bacterial involvement in leaf litter decomposition. Proteomics 10(9):1819–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider T, Keiblinger KM, Schmid E, Sterflinger-Gleixner K, Ellersdorfer G, Roschitzki B, Richter A, Eberl L, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Riedel K (2012) Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions. ISME J 6(9):1749–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead D (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production—a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26(10):1305–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison SD, Crenshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL, Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP, Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11(11):1252–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462(7274):795–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone MM, Weiss MS, Goodale CL, Adams MB, Fernandez IJ, German DP, Allison SD (2012) Temperature sensitivity of soil enzyme kinetics under N-fertilization in two temperate forests. Glob Change Biol 18:1173–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland MS, Rousk J (2010) Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils—methods, controls, and ecosystem implications. Soil Biol Biochem 42(9):1385–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland MS, Lauber CL, Fierer N, Bradford MA (2009) Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. Ecology 90(2):441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot JM, Treseder KK (2012) Interactions among lignin, cellulose, and nitrogen drive litter chemistry-decay relationships. Ecology 93(2):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Toots M, DiÉDhiou AG, Henkel TW, KjØLler R, Morris MH, Nara K, Nouhra E, Peay KG, PÕLme S, Ryberg M, Smith ME, KÕLjalg U (2012) Towards global patterns in the diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mol Ecol 21(17):4160–4170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toberman H, Evans CD, Freeman C, Fenner N, White M, Emmett BA, Artz RRE (2008) Summer drought effects upon soil and litter extracellular phenol oxidase activity and soluble carbon release in an upland Calluna heathland. Soil Biol Biochem 40(6):1519–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL (2010) Variation in pH optima of hydrolytic enzyme activities in tropical ran forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(19):6485–6493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop MP, Balser TC, Firestone MK (2000) Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32(13):1837–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP (2009) Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Change Biol 15(7):1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub MN, Scott-Denton LE, Schmidt SK, Monson RK (2007) The effects of tree rhizodeposition on soil exoenzyme activity, dissolved organic carbon, and nutrient availability in a subalpine forest ecosystem. Oecologia 154(2):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zak DR, Holmes WE, MacDonald NW, Pregitzer KS (1999) Soil temperature, matric potential, and the kinetics of microbial respiration and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(3):575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

C.V. Hawkes, S.R. Holden, C. Averill, B.G. Waring, H.E. Giauque and E.R. Worchel provided insightful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. C. Doan and A. Chan assisted in EEA measurements. This publication was developed under STAR Fellowship Assistance Agreement no. FP917191-01-0 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to SNK. It has not been formally reviewed by the EPA. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors and EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned. SNK and KKT were supported by a Kearney Foundation grant and a National Science Foundation Ecosystems grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA

    Stephanie N. Kivlin & Kathleen K. Treseder

  2. Section of Integrative Biology, Patterson Labs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Stephanie N. Kivlin

Authors
  1. Stephanie N. Kivlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen K. Treseder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie N. Kivlin.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kivlin, S.N., Treseder, K.K. Soil extracellular enzyme activities correspond with abiotic factors more than fungal community composition. Biogeochemistry 117, 23–37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9852-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9852-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation