Skip to main content
Log in

Linguistic, psychometric validation and diagnostic ability assessment of an Italian version of a 19-item wearing-off questionnaire for wearing-off detection in Parkinson’s disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A patient self-rated 19-item wearing-off questionnaire (WOQ-19) was shown to be a potent screening tool for wearing-off (WO) in patients with Parkinson’s disease. As part of the early detection of wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease study, we preliminarily performed a linguistic and a psychometric validation of an Italian version of the WOQ-19. Moreover, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the WOQ-19 in the office-based settings. The psychometric validation study included assessment of discriminant ability, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Cronbach’s Alpha were assessed. The WOQ-19 sensitivity and specificity were calculated in respect to the physician assessment of WO, taken as the gold standard. The Italian version of WOQ-19 was found easy to understand by ≥80% of the patients. The number of WO-related symptoms detected by WOQ-19 was 7.5 ± 3.2 in patients with WO and 1.6 ± 2.6 in patients without WO (p < 0.0001). Cronbach’s alpha was equal to 0.868 for the total number of WO symptoms. The ICC value was equal to 0.858 for WO-related symptoms as a whole. The diagnostic ability study recruited 207 patients: for a WOQ-19 cut-off ≥2, the sensitivity was equal to 0.881 and the specificity was 0.674. This is the first validation of WOQ-19 in Italian, with excellent linguistic validity and psychometric properties. WOQ-19 was confirmed to be reliable in WO detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olanow CW, Agid Y, Mizuno Y et al (2004) Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: current controversies. Mov Disord 19(9):997–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrag A, Quinn N (2000) Dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based study. Brain 123:2297–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parkinson Study Group (2000) Pramipexole versus levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 284(15):1931–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stacy M, Bowron A, Guttman M et al (2005) Identification of motor and nonmotor wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease: comparison of a patient questionnaire versus a clinician assessment. Mov Disord 20(6):726–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parkinson Study Group (1996) Impact of deprenyl and tocopherol treatment on Parkinson’s disease in DATATOP patients requiring levodopa. Ann Neurol 39:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Witjas T, Kaphan E, Azulay JP et al (2002) Nonmotor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: frequent and disabling. Neurology 59:408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weintraub D, Moberg PJ, Duda JE et al (2004) Effect of psychiatric and other nonmotor symptoms on disability in Parkinson’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:784–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler CH (2002) Relevance of motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 58(suppl 1):51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stacy M, Hauser R (2007) Development of a patient questionnaire to facilitate recognition of motor and non-motor wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Trans 114:211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinez-Martin P, Tolosa E, Hernandez B (2008) Validation of the “QUICK” Questionnaire—a tool for diagnosis of “wearing-off” in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 23:830–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Santens P, de Noordhout AM, Belgian EODWO Study Group (2006) Detection of motor and non-motor symptoms of end-of dose wearing-off in Parkinson’s disease using a dedicated questionnaire: a Belgian multicenter survey. Acta Neurol Belg 106:137–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P, Chaudhuri RK et al (2011) Wearing-off scales in Parkinson’s disease: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 26:2169–2175

    Google Scholar 

  13. Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I (2004) Linguistic validation manual for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments. MAPI Research Institute, Lyon

  14. Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S (1999) Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 56(1):33–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martinez-Martin P, Schapira AH, Stocchi F et al (2007) Prevalence of nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease in an international setting; study using nonmotor symptoms questionnaire in 545 patients. Mov Disord 22:1623–1629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ahlskog JE, Muenter MD (2001) Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature. Mov Disord 16:448–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stacy MA, Murphy JM, Greeley DR et al (2008) The sensitivity of the 9-item wearing-off questionnaire. Parkins Rel Disord 14:205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Azulay JP, Durif F, Rogez R (2008) Precoce survey: a new self-assessment patient card for early detection and management of Parkinson disease fluctuations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164(4):354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an educational grant issued by Novartis, Italy. The authors are grateful to Medidata for data collection and analysis and to Shalom Haggiag for helping writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Abbruzzese.

Additional information

On behalf of the DEEP study group. The members of DEEP study group are listed in Appendix 1.

Appendix 1: The DEEP study group

Appendix 1: The DEEP study group

Abbruzzese G.:

Centro Parkinson, Dipartimento Neuroscienze Università degli Studi di Genova (Genova)

Albanese A.:

Neurologia I Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Neurologico C. Besta (Milano)

Antonini A.:

U.O. Malattia di Parkinson Ospedale San Camillo (Venezia)

Barone P.:

Scuola Medica Salernitana, Università degli Studi di Salerno (Salerno)

Bentivoglio AR.:

Neurologia Università Cattolica S. Cuore Policlinico Gemelli (Roma)

Bono G.:

Neurologia Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi (Varese)

Bonuccelli U.:

U.O. Neurologia Ospedale Versilia (Camaiore)

Cannas A.:

Neurologia Policlinico Universitario di Monserrato (Monserrato)

Ceravolo R.:

U.O. Neurologia Ospedale Santa Chiara (Pisa)

Ceravolo MG.:

Clinica Neuroriabilitazione Az. Ospedali Riuniti (Ancona)

Cicarelli G.:

Neurologia A.O.R.N. San Giuseppe Moscati (Avellino)

Cincotta M.:

Neurologia Azienda Sanitaria Firenze, Piero Palagi (Firenze)

Corengia E.:

Neurologia Ospedale Valduce (Como)

D’Amelio M.:

Neurologia Az. Osp. Univ. Policlinico “P. Giaccone” (Palermo)

De Pandis MF.:

U.O. Riabilitazione Parkinson Ospedale San Raffaele Cassino (Cassino)

Eleopra R.:

SOC Neurologia Az. Osp. Univ. S.Maria della Misericordia (Udine)

Lamberti P.:

Neurologia “Amaducci” Az. Osp. Univ. Policlinico Consorziale (Bari)

Lopiano L.:

Neurologia 4 A.S.O. Molinette (Torino)

Manzo V.:

Neurologia, Padiglione F, Amb UVA AORN A. Cardarelli (Napoli)

Marconi R.:

Neurologia Ospedale della Misericordia (Grosseto)

Mauro A.:

Struttura Dipartimentale Neuropsicologia AORN San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona (Salerno)

Michelucci R.:

U.O.C. Neurologia Ospedale Bellaria (Bologna)

Morgante F.:

Clinica Neurologica Policlinico G. Martino (Messina)

Onofrj M.:

CeSI, Centro Studi Invecchiamento Fondazione Università Gabriele D’Annunzio (Chieti)

Pezzoli G.:

Centro Parkinson Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento (Milano)

Pisani V.:

Clinica Neurologica Policlinico Tor Vergata (Roma)

Pisano F.:

Neurologia Riabilitativa Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS Veruno (Veruno)

Pramstaller PP.:

Neurologia Ospedale di Bolzano (Bolzano)

Priori A.:

Neurologia Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Milano)

Quatrale R.:

UO Neurologia Arcispedale Sant’Anna (Ferrara)

Quattrone A.:

Clinica Neurologica Università Magna Grecia (Catanzaro)

Ruggieri S.:

Neurologia Istituto Mediterraneo Neuromed (Pozzilli)

Scarzella L.:

Neurologia Ospedale Evangelico Valdese (Torino)

Stocchi F.:

Dipartimento di Neurologia IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana di Roma (Roma)

Tinazzi M.:

U.O. Neurologia Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Borgo Trento (Verona)

Valzania F.:

Clinica Neurologica Nuovo Ospedale Sant’Agostino-Estense (Modena)

Zappia M.:

Clinica Neurologica I Policlinico Universitario (Catania)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbruzzese, G., Antonini, A., Barone, P. et al. Linguistic, psychometric validation and diagnostic ability assessment of an Italian version of a 19-item wearing-off questionnaire for wearing-off detection in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 33, 1319–1327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-0943-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-0943-y

Keywords

Navigation