Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proficiency testing of wastewater sampling: What did we learn?

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proficiency testing of wastewater sampling is organized by the Laboratory for Environmental Sciences and Engineering at the National Institute of Chemistry, Slovenia (NIC). Preliminary tests started in 2010 at two candidate sites to choose for a trial the most convenient one. In 2012, we organized the first collaborative field trial on wastewater sampling and such trials continued in 2013 and 2014. Between 16 and 20 sampling teams were selected from those that (1) participate in the national wastewater monitoring program and (2) perform analytical activities in laboratories. The participants used a 6-h time proportional sampling approach. They used sampling equipment with different principles of sample collection which take a series of discrete samples at fixed time intervals. Subsequent analyses involved both field and laboratory measurements. The participants, with only one exception, exhibited required technical skills for measuring field parameters (temperature and pH value). All samples taken were also analyzed at NIC. The variability between reported values of participants in the trials, expressed as CV, was found to be 8.5 %, 11.1 % and 9.5 % for chemical oxygen demand. Of all parameters, the largest variability was found for total organic carbon concentration amounting to 23.7 % and 35.7 %. Particular attention was given to separate the measurement uncertainty contributions arising from sampling and chemical analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. ISO, IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. Water Framework Directive Chemical Monitoring Activity—EUR 22922 EN (2007) http://fate.jrc.ec.europa.eu/monitoring/activities/pdf-documentsWFD

  3. Ramsey MH, Thompson M (2007) Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose. Accred Qual Assur 12:503–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO, IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment general requirements for proficiency testing. International Standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 13528 (2005) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. International standard Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2006) The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 5667-10 (1992) Water quality sampling—part 4: guidance on sampling of wastewaters, Geneva

  8. Kurfurst U, Desaules A, Rehnert A, Muntau H (2004) Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use. Accred Qual Assur 9:64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gluschke M (2008) Collaborative sampling trial in the context of quality assurance in the German marine monitoring programme for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. Accred Qual Assur 13:101–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Botta F, Lepot B, Leoz-Garziandia E, Morin A (2012) Estimation of sampling uncertainty in lake-water monitoring in a collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 36:176–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanke G, Polesello S, Mariani G, Comero S, Wollgast J, Loos R, Castro-Jimenez J, Patrolecco L, Valsecchi S, Rusconi M, Ademollo N, Bidoglio G (2012) Chemical-monitoring on-site exercises to harmonize analytical methods for priority substances in the European Union. Trends Anal Chem 36:25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Näykki T, Leivuori M, Björklöf K, Väisänen R, Laine M, Väisänen T, Leito I (2014) Proficiency test of pH, conductivity and dissolved oxygen concentration field measurements in river water. Accred Qualy Assur 19:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotman M, Pintar A (2013) Sampling uncertainty of wastewater monitoring estimated in collaborative field trial. Trends Anal Chem 51:71–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strub MP, Lepot B, Morin A (2009) Metrological aspects of collaborative field trials, including coping with unexpected events. Trends Anal Chem 28:245–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Drolc A, Cotman M, Roš M (2003) Uncertainty of chemical oxygen demand determination in wastewater samples. Accred Qual Assur 8:138–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Drolc A, Cotman M, Roš M, Majcen N (2006) Measurement traceability and its role in proficiency testing schemes—a case study for wastewater analysis in Slovenia. Accred Qual Assur 11:455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Albano FM, Caten CS (2014) Proficiency tests for laboratories: a systematic review. Accred Qual Assur 19:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lyn JA, Ramsey MH, Damant AP, Wood R (2007) Empirical versus modelling approaches to the estimation of measurement uncertainty caused by primary sampling. Analyst 132:1231–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramsey MH, Geelhoed B, Wood R, Damant AP (2011) Improved evaluation of measurement uncertainty for sampling by inclusion of between-sampler bias using sampling proficiency testing. Analyst 136:1313–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO 6060 (1989) Water quality—determination of chemical oxygen demand. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia through Research Program No. P2-0150.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magda Cotman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cotman, M., Pintar, A. Proficiency testing of wastewater sampling: What did we learn?. Accred Qual Assur 20, 387–394 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1170-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1170-z

Keywords

Navigation