Abstract
Background
Decompressive craniectomy is an important method for managing refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with head injury. We reviewed a large series of patients who underwent this surgical procedure to establish the incidence and type of postoperative complications.
Methods
From 1998 to 2005, decompressive craniectomy was performed in 108 patients who suffered from a closed head injury. The incidence rates of complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy and risk factors for developing these complications were analysed. In addition, the relationship between outcome and clinical factors was analysed.
Findings
Twenty-five of the 108 patients died within the first month after surgical decompression. A lower GCS at admission seemed to be associated with a poorer outcome. Complications related to surgical decompression occurred in 54 of the 108 (50%) patients; of these, 28 (25.9%) patients developed more than one type of complication. Herniation through the cranial defect was the most frequent complication within 1 week and 1 month, and subdural effusion was another frequent complication during this period. After 1 month, the “syndrome of the trephined” and hydrocephalus were the most frequent complications. Older patients and/or those with more severe head trauma had a higher occurrence rate of complications.
Conclusions
The potential benefits of decompressive craniectomy can be adversely affected by the occurrence of complications. Each complication secondary to surgical decompression had its own typical time window for occurrence. In addition, the severity of head injury was related to the development of a complication.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM (2006) Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg 104:469–479
Adamides AA, Winter CD, Lewis PM, Cooper DJ, Kossmann T, Rosenfeld JV (2006) Current controversies in the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. ANZ J Surg 76:163–174
Beyerl B, Black PM (1984) Posttraumatic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 15:257–261
Boret H, Fesselet J, Meaudre E, Gaillard PE, Cantais E (2006) Cerebral microdialysis and P(ti)O2 for neuro-monitoring before decompressive craniectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:252–254
Bullock R, Hanemann CO, Murray L, Teasdale GM (1990) Recurrent hematomas following craniotomy for traumatic intracranial mass. J Neurosurg 72:9–14
Cardoso ER, Galbraith S (1985) Posttraumatic hydrocephalus—a retrospective review. Surg Neurol 23:261–264
Carvi Y, Nievas MN, Hollerhage HG (2006) Early combined cranioplasty and programmable shunt in patients with skull bone defects and CSF-circulation disorders. Neurol Res 28:139–144
Chinese Medical Association (2006) Clinical guidelines of Chinese Medical Association: fascicule of neurosurgery. People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing
Chute DL (2002) Neuropsychological technologies in rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 17:369–377
Coplin WM, Cullen NK, Policherla PN, Vinas FC, Wilseck JM, Zafonte RD, Rengachary SS (2001) Safety and feasibility of craniectomy with duraplasty as the initial surgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 50:1050–1059
Csokay A, Nagy L, Novoth B (2001) Avoidance of vascular compression in decompressive surgery for brain edema caused by trauma and tumor ablation. Neurosurg Rev 24:209–213
D’Ambrosio R, Perucca E (2004) Epilepsy after head injury. Curr Opin Neurol 17:731–735
Dujovny M, Agner C, Aviles A (1999) Syndrome of the trephined: theory and facts. Crit Rev Neurosurg 9:271–278
Guyot LL, Michael DB (2000) Post-traumatic hydrocephalus. Neurol Res 22:25–28
Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y, Honda T, Nakazawa H (2004) Sinking skin flap syndrome: a case of improved cerebral blood flow after cranioplasty. Ann Plast Surg 53:288–292
Kan P, Amini A, Hansen K, White GL Jr, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, Kestle JR (2006) Outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg 105(5 Suppl):337–342
Kilincer C, Simsek O, Hamamcioglu MK, Hicdonmez T, Cobanoglu S (2005) Contralateral subdural effusion after aneurysm surgery and decompressive craniectomy: case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:412–416
Koller M, Ortler M, Langmayr J, Twerdy K (1999) Posterior-fossa haemorrhage after supratentorial surgery—report of three cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:587–592
Konig A, Laas R, Herrmann HD (1987) Cerebellar haemorrhage as a complication after supratentorial craniotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 88:104–108
Kontopoulos V, Foroglou N, Patsalas J, Magras J, Foroglou G, Yiannakou-Pephtoulidou M, Sofianos E, Anastassiou H, Tsaoussi G (2002) Decompressive craniectomy for the management of patients with refractory hypertension: should it be reconsidered. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:791–796
Landeiro JA, Flores MS, Lapenta MA, Galdino AC, Lazaro BC (2004) Remote hemorrhage from the site of craniotomy. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 62:832–834
Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, Karimi A, Lapierre F, Murray G, Ohman J, Persson L, Servadei F, Stocchetti N, Unterberg A (1997) EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. European Brain Injury Consortium. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:286–294
Miki T, Nakajima N, Wada J, Haraoka J (2006) Cause of post-traumatic hydrocephalus because of traumatic aqueduct obstruction in two cases. J Trauma 61:985–989
Mitchell P, Tseng M, Mendelow AD (2004) Decompressive craniectomy with lattice duraplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:159–160
Piek J (2002) Decompressive surgery in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 8(2):134–138
Ruf B, Heckmann M, Schroth I, Hugens-Penzel M, Reiss I, Borkhardt A, Gortner L, Jödicke A (2003) Early decompressive craniectomy and duraplasty for refractory intracranial hypertension in children: results of a pilot study. Crit Care 7:R133–R138
Schaller B, Graf R, Sanada Y, Rosner G, Wienhard K, Heiss WD (2003) Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of decompressive hemicraniectomy in normal brain: an experimental PET-study in cats. Brain Res 982:31–37
Stone JL, Lang RG, Sugar O, Moody RA (1981) Traumatic subdural hygroma. Neurosurgery 8:542–550
Timofeev I, Hutchinson PJ (2006) Outcome after surgical decompression of severe traumatic brain injury. Injury 37:1125–1132
The Brain Trauma Foundation (2000) The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The joint section on neurotrauma and critical care. Guidelines for cerebral perfusion pressure. J Neurotrauma 17:507–511
van den Broek MD (2005) Why does neurorehabilitation fail. J Head Trauma Rehabil 20:464–473
Yamakami I, Yamaura A (1993) Effects of decompressive craniectomy on regional cerebral blood flow in severe head trauma patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 33:616–620
Yang XJ, Hong GL, Su SB, Yang SY (2003) Complications induced by decompressive craniectomies after traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol 6:99–103
Wen L, Yang XF, Liu WG, Shen G, Zheng XS, Cao F, Li G (2007) Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg 18:526–532
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Comment
This manuscript reports one of the largest series of decompressive craniectomies performed in TBI that I have seen. In current day neurotraumatologic practice, the use of decompressive craniectomies is becoming more popular, despite the lack of class I evidence to support it's beneficial effect on outcome. Whist it was formally only considered in patients in whom medical management failed to adequately control ICP, many centers now perform a decompressive craniectomy at earlier stages. One of the reasons underlying this is the understanding that it is a relatively harmless operation without serious complications. This paper clearly shows that decompressive craniectomy should not be considered 'a harmless procedure'. Strengths are the large patient numbers and the clear insight into the time course of different complications. Relative drawbacks are that it concerns a retrospective study and that no conclusions concerning efficacy of decompressive craniectomy can be drawn, although reported outcome assessment at a fixed time point is at least as good, if not better than other series reporting on severe TBI.
Andrew Maas
University Hospital Antwerp
Belgium
X. F. Yang and L. Wen contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X.F., Wen, L., Shen, F. et al. Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150, 1241–1248 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9