Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Subjective estimations of thermal environment in recreational urban spaces—Part 2: international comparison

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper is the second part of our study in which we compare the results obtained in Szeged (Hungary) with those achieved through earlier outdoor thermal comfort projects based on simultaneous questionnaire surveys and on-site meteorological measurements. The main characteristics of the selected studies—conducted in Hungary, Sweden, Portugal, Canada, Taiwan and across Europe in the frame of project RUROS—are reviewed, emphasizing the common features and also the discrepancies in the applied methodology. We discuss their potential effects on the evolution and interpretation of the results concerning the subjective assessment of the thermal environment. Another aspect of the comparison focuses on the regional climatic differences naturally ensuing from the various locations, which left their marks on the results related to both physiological acclimatization and mental adaptation. The compared results of different studies include correlation coefficients expressing interrelationships between the different aspects of subjective estimations (thermal sensation, perceptions, preferences) and also between subjective assessments and the corresponding meteorological parameters. We compare neutral temperatures (expressed in physiological equivalent temperature, PET) which arose for Taiwan and Hungary, as well as thermal sensation zones for local inhabitants. Subjectively assessed temperature values of Sweden and Hungarians are analyzed according to the measured air temperature. According to our experiences the methodology should be standardized for the level of field surveys and also for the level of data processing in order to make the data collected in different locations comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade H, Alcoforado MJ (2008) Microclimatic variation of thermal comfort in a district of Lisbon (Telheiras) at night. Theor Appl Climatol 92:225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998) Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build 27:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Weather Bureau (2011) Climate statistics. http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7e/climate/monthlyMean/tx.htm. Accessed July 2011

  • Deb C, Ramachandraiah A (2010) Evaluation of thermal comfort in a rail terminal in India. Build Environ 45:2571–2580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson I, Knez I, Westenberg U, Thorsson S, Lindberg F (2007) Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landscape Urban Plan 82:72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. McGraw Hill, New York, p 244

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala D, Havenith G, Bröde P, Kampmann B, Jendritzky G (2011) UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulation. Int J Biometeorol. doi:10.1007/s00484-011-0424-7

  • Fountain M, Brager G, de Dear RJ (1996) Expectations of indoor climatic control. Energy Build 24:179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höppe P (1988) Comfort requirements in indoor climate. Energy Build 11:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höppe P (1992) Ein neues Verfahren zur Bestimmung der mittleren Strahlungstemperatur in Freien. Wetter und Leben 44:147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Höppe P (1993) Indoor climate. Experientia 49:775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höppe P (1999) The physiological equivalent temperature—an universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol 43:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendritzky G, Sönning W, Swantes HJ (1979) Ein objektives Bewertungsverfahren zur Beschreibung des thermischen Milieus in der Stadt- und Landschaftsplanung (Klima-Michel-Modell). ARL Beiträge 28

  • Kántor N, Égerházi L, Unger J (2012) Subjective estimations of thermal environment in recreational urban spaces—Part 1: investigations in Szeged, Hungary. doi:10.1007/s00484-012-0523-0

  • Kántor N, Unger J (2010) Benefits and opportunities of adapting GIS in thermal comfort studies in resting places: an urban park as an example. Landscape Urban Plan 98:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I, Thorsson S (2006) Influences of culture and environmental attitude on thermal, emotional and perceptual evaluations of a public square. Int J Biometeorol 50:258–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez I, Thorsson S, Eliasson I, Lindberg F (2009) Psychological mechanisms in outdoor place and weather assessment: towards a conceptual model. Int J Biometeorol 53:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzholzer S, Koh J (2010) Immersed microclimatic space: microclimate experience and perception of spatial configurations in Dutch squares. Landscape Urban Plan 95:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TP (2009) Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ 44:2017–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TP, Matzarakis A (2008) Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan. Int J Biometeorol 52:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis A, Mayer H (1996) Another kind of environmental stress: thermal stress. WHO News 18:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Izomon MG (1999) Application of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. Int J Biometeorol 43:76–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2007) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments—application of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 51:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis A, de Rocco M, Najjar G (2009) Thermal bioclimate in Strasbourg—the 2003 heat wave. Theor Appl Climatol 98:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzarakis A, Rutz F, Mayer H (2010) Modelling radiation fluxes in simple and complex environments: basics of the RayMan model. Int J Biometeorol 54:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H (1996) Human-biometeorologische probleme des stadtklimas. Geowissenschaften 14(6):233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H (2008) KLIMES—a joint research project on human thermal comfort in cities. Ber Meteor Inst Univ Freiburg 17:101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H, Höppe P (1987) Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theor Appl Climatol 38:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer H, Holst J, Dostal P, Imbery F, Schindler D (2008) Human thermal comfort in summer within an urban street canyon in Central Europe. Meteorol Z 17:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre DA (1980) Indoor climate. Applied Science Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan C, de Dear R (2003) Weather, clothing and thermal adaptation to indoor climate. Clim Res 24:267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou M, Steemers K (2003) Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energy Build 35:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou M, Baker N, Steemers K (2001) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameter. Sol Energy 70:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopulou M, Lykoudis S (2006) Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: analysis across different European countries. Build Environ 41:1455–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopulou M, Lykoudis S (2007) Use of outdoor spaces and microclimate in a Mediterranean urban area. Build Environ 42:3691–3707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira S, Andrade H (2007) An initial assessment of the bioclimatic comfort in an outdoor public space in Lisbon. Int J Biometeorol 52:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolopoulou M (Project coordinator) (2011) RUROS: rediscovering the urban realm and open spaces. http://alpha.cres.gr/ruros/. Accessed July 2011

  • Spagnolo J, de Dear R (2003) A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi-outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney, Australia. Build Environ 38:721–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulos T, Wu H, Zacharias J (2004) Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Build Environ 39:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Weather Network (2011) Weather statistics. http://www.theweathernetwork.com/statistics/suncloud/cl7025250/caqc0363. Accessed July 2011

  • Thorsson S, Lindqvist M, Lindqvist S (2004) Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Göteborg, Sweden. Int J Biometeorol 48:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VDI (1998) Methods for the human-biometeorological assessment of climate and air hygiene for urban and regional planning. Part I: Climate. VDI 3787, Part 2. Beuth, Berlin, p 29

  • WMO (1996) Climatological normals (CLINO) for the period 1961–1990. WMO/OMM-No. 847. Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0012. Thanks to E. Tanács for the language corrections, and to reviewers for their constructive recommendations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

    Noémi Kántor, János Unger & Ágnes Gulyás

Authors
  1. Noémi Kántor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. János Unger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ágnes Gulyás
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noémi Kántor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kántor, N., Unger, J. & Gulyás, Á. Subjective estimations of thermal environment in recreational urban spaces—Part 2: international comparison. Int J Biometeorol 56, 1089–1101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-012-0564-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-012-0564-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation