Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of the Veterinary Pharmaceutical Salinomycin and its Formulation on the Plant Brassica rapa

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Veterinary pharmaceuticals are emerging contaminants found throughout the environment, and their presence and effects are a matter of concern. The purpose of this study was to compare the phytotoxicity of salinomycin (pure compound = 96 %) and Sacox 120 (formulated product = 120 g salinomycin/kg) to the plant species Brassica rapa as well as to investigate salinomycin persistence in soil. Calculated EC/IC50 values for salinomycin and Sacox 120 were 1.10 and 2.88 and 2.19 and 18.03 mg/kg, respectively, based on salinomycin concentration. For exposure of B. rapa to salinomycin, significant adverse effects were observed for growth end points at the greater concentrations. For the reproduction end point (i.e., number of buds), as well as root length and wet mass, significant differences were observed at the lower concentrations (stimulating growth) and adverse effects at the greater concentrations. This study confirmed that the toxic effects of Sacox 120 are attributable to the active ingredient salinomycin. Liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry analyses confirmed that exposure concentrations of salinomycin were 90 and 83 % of the nominal concentrations, respectively, in the soils amended with either pure or formulated product. At the end of the experiment, after 14 days, salinomycin concentrations for both tests (salinomycin and Sacox 120) decreased to 6.2 and 5.8 % of the nominal exposure concentrations, respectively. Detected salinomycin concentrations in plant shoots ranged from 3.47 to 41.0 ng/g dry shoot. This study shows the importance of using plants as tools to evaluate environmental risk and as a bridge to relate environment and human health risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boxall ABA, Kolpin DW, Halling-Sørensen B, Tolls J (2003) Are veterinary medicines causing environmental risks? Environ Sci Technol 15:286A–294A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall A, Kay P, Blackwell P, Fogg L (2004) Fate of veterinary pharmaceuticals in applied soils. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment: sources, fate, and risks, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Chee-Sanford JC, Mackie RI, Koike S, Krapac IG, Lin YF, Yannarell AC et al (2009) Fate and transport of antibiotic residues and antibiotic resistance genes following land application of manure waste. J Environ Qual 38:1086–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Abrosca B, Fiorentino A, Izzo A, Cefarelli G, Pascarella MT, Uzzo P et al (2008) Phytotoxicity evaluation of five pharmaceutical pollutants detected in surface water on germination and growth of cultivated and spontaneous plants. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 43:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolliver H, Kuldip K, Gupta S (2007) Sulfamethazine uptake by plants from manure-amended soil. J Environ Qual 36:1224–1230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho AL (1984) Biochemical studies on the fate of monensin in animals and in the environment. J Anim Sci 58:1528–1539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (EC) (2005a) Biological test method: test for measuring emergence and growth of terrestrial plants exposed to contaminants in soil. Report EPS 1/RM/45, February 2005. Method Development and Applications Section, Environmental Technology Centre, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  • Environment Canada (EC) (2005b) Guidance document on statistical methods for environmental toxicity tests. Report EPS 1/RM/46, March 2005. Method Development and Applications Section, Environmental Technology Centre, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  • Forrest F, Lorenz K, Thomson T, Keenliside J, Kendell J, Charest J (2011) A scoping study of livestock antimicrobials in agricultural streams of Alberta. Can Water Resour J 36:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtula V, Hannah H, Wetzstein M, Englar R (2005) Veterinary pollutants in poultry waste. Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes Island, Greece

  • Furtula V, Huang L, Chambers PA (2009) Determination of veterinary pharmaceuticals in poultry litter and soil by methanol extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Environ Sci Health B 44(7):717–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICPIN (1993) A linear interpolation method for sublethal toxicity: The inhibition concentration (ICp) approach, version 2.0. United States EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN

  • International Organization for Standardization (1995) Soil quality: determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora—Part 2: effects of chemicals on the emergence of greater plants. ISO 11269-2, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jjemba PK (2002) The potential impact of veterinary and human therapeutic agents in manure and biosolids on plant growth on arable land: a review. Agric Ecosys Environ 93:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SJ, Roser DJ, Davies CM, Peters GM, Stuetz RM, Tucker R et al (2008) Chemical contaminants in feedlot wastes: concentrations, effects and attenuation. Environ Int 34:839–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Gupta SC, Baidoo SK, Chander Y, Rosen CJ (2005) Antibiotic uptake by plants from soil fertilized with animal manure. J Environ Qual 6:2082–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer MT, Bumgarner JE, Varns JL, Daughtridge JV, Thurman EM, Hostetler KA (2000) Use of radioimmunoassay as a screen for antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and confirmation by liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry. Sci Total Environ 248:181–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy J, Prasher SO, Patel RM, Hussein SA, Barrington SF (2010) The effect of composting on the degradation of a veterinary pharmaceutical. Bioresour Technol 101:2294–2299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmah AK, Mayer MT, Boxall ABA (2006) A global prospective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (Vas) in the environment. Chemosphere 65:725–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüsener MP, Bester K (2006) Persistence of antibiotics such as macrolides, tiamulin and salinomycin in soil. Environ Pollut 3:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan CE, Busch KA, Smith R, Burke J, Andrew RW (1978) A computer program for calculating an LC50. [LC50.BAS]. (provided courtesy of Dr. C. E. Stephan, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN)

  • Tolls J (2001) Sorption of veterinary pharmaceuticals in soils: a review. Environ Sci Technol 35:3397–3406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Váczi P, Neuschl J, Šály J, Lenhart L (2006) Comparison of the acute toxicity of sodium salinomycin in synvertas and sacox preparation in chickens. Bull Vet Inst Pulavy 50:379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe N, Harter TH, Bargamaschi BA (2008) Environmental occurrence and shallow ground water detection of antibiotic monensin from dairy farms. J Environ Qual 37:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Health Canada and Environment Canada for providing funds to conduct this research and gratefully acknowledge Stantec Consulting, Ltd., for the in-kind contributions by way of Stantec’s R&D Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Furtula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furtula, V., Stephenson, G.L., Olaveson, K.M. et al. Effects of the Veterinary Pharmaceutical Salinomycin and its Formulation on the Plant Brassica rapa . Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 63, 513–522 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-012-9807-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-012-9807-y

Keywords

Navigation