Abstract
This paper puts forward a Bayesian method for multiple gross errors location and estimation, and studies the masking and swamping problem in multiple gross errors detection from a new point of view, further proposes the corresponding feasible solution. First, the Bayesian method for gross error location is established based on the posterior probabilities of classification variables, each of which is used to determine whether each observation contains gross error or not. When some interactions exist among observations with multiple gross errors, the above-mentioned method may lead to the failure of detection due to masking and swamping. For that, on the basis of analyzing the character of masking and swamping, starting from the eigen structure of the sample correlation coefficient matrix of the classification vector, we give the Bayesian unmasking method to locate multiple gross errors, and design the corresponding algorithm, namely the adaptive Gibbs sampling algorithm. Finally, applying the mean shift model, we raise a Bayesian approach to estimate gross errors. Significant applications of the approach show the promising results on overcoming masking and swamping.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- MCMC:
-
Markov chain Monte Carlo
References
Aduol FWO, Schaffrin B (1986) On outlier identification in geodetic networks using principal component analysis. Conference on Influential Data Analysis, Sheffield, UK
Awange JL (2005) Diagnosis of outlier of type multipath in GPS pseudo-range observations. Surv Rev 38(297): 177–189
Baarda W (1968) A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks. Publication on Geodesy, New series 2 No.5, The Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft
Baselga S (2007) Critical limitation in use of τ test for gross error detection. J Surv Eng 133(2): 52–55
Berber M, Hekimoglu S (2003) What is the reliability of conventional outlier detection and robust estimation in trilateration networks? Surv Rev 37(290): 308–318
Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Betti B, Crespi M, Sansò F (1993) A geometric illustration of ambiguity resolution in GPS theory and a Bayesian approach. Manuscr Geod 18(6): 317–330
Bock Y (1983) Estimating crustal deformations from a combination of baseline measurements and geophysical models. Bull Geod 57(3): 294–311
Bossler JD (1972) Bayesian inference in geodesy. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Cen M, Li Z, Ding X, Zhuo J (2003) Gross error diagnostics before least squares adjustment of observations. J Geod 77: 503–513
Chen Y, Kavouras M, Chrzanowski A (1987) A strategy for detection of outlying observations in measurements of high precision. Can Surveyor 41(4): 529–540
Chung LK (1974) A course in probability theory. Academic Press, New York
Cross PA, Price DR (1985) A strategy for the distinction between single and multiple gross errors in geodetic networks. Manuscr Geod 10(4): 172–178
de Lacy MC, Reguzzoni M, Sansò F, Venuti G (2008) The Bayesian detection of discontinuities in a polynomial regression and its application to the cycle-slip problem. J Geod 82: 527–542
de Lacy MC, Sansò F, Rodriguez-Caderot , Gil AJ (2002) The Bayesian approach applied to GPS ambiguity resolution, A mixture model for the discrete-real ambiguities alternative. J Geod 76: 82–94
Ding X, Coleman R (1996) Multiple outlier detection by evaluating redundancy contributions of observations. J Geod 70: 489–498
Ethrog U (1991) Statistical test of significance for testing outlying observations. Surv Rev 31(240): 62–70
Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalt DJ (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London
Götzelmann M, Keller W, Reubelt T (2006) Gross error compensation for gravity field analysis based on kinematic orbit data. J Geod 80: 184–198
Gui Q, Gong Y, Li G, Li B (2007) Bayesian approach for detection of gross errors based on posterior probability. J Geod 81: 651–659
Guo J, Ou J, Wang H (2007) Quasi-accurate detection of outliers for correlated observations. J Surv Eng 133(3): 129–133
Hadi AS, Simonoff JS (1993) Procedures for the identication of multiple outliers in linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 1264–1272
Hekimoglu S (1997) The finite sample breakdown points of outlier detection procedures. J Surv Eng 123(1): 15–31
Hekimoglu S (1999) Robustifying conventional outlier detection procedures. J Surv Eng 125(2): 69–86
Hekimoglu S, Erenoglu RC (2007) Effect of heteroscedasticity and heterogeneousness on outlier detection for geodetic networks. J Geod 81: 137–148
Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York
Justel A, Pena D (2001) Bayesian unmasking in linear models. Comput Stat Data Anal 36: 69–84
Kern M, Preimesberger T, Allesch M, Pail R, Bouman J, Koop R (2005) Outlier detection algorithms and their performance in GOCE gravity. J Geod 78: 509–519
Koch KR (1990) Bayesian inference with geodetic appliances. Springer, Berlin
Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Koch KR (2007) Introduction to Bayesian statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Koch KR (2007) Outlier detection in observations including leverage points by Monte Carlo simulations. Allg Verm-Nachr 114: 330–336
Koch KR, Papo H (2003) The Bayesian approach in two-step modeling of deformations. Allg Verm-Nachr 110(111): 365–370
Kubik K, Wang Y (1991) Comparison of different principles for outlier detection. Aust J Geod Photogram Surv 54: 67–80
Li X, Gui Q, Xu A (2008) Bayesian method for detection of gross errors based on classification variables (in Chinese). Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 37(3): 355–360
Liu JS (2001) Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer, Berlin
Ou Z (1991) Approximative Bayes estimation for variance components. Manuscr Geod 16(4): 168–172
Ou Z (1993) Bayesian inference for variance factor with maximum entropy prior. Manuscr Geod 18: 242–247
Pelzer H (1980) Some criteria for the accuracy and reliability of networks. DGK Reihe B Nr 252: 55–67
Pope AJ (1976) The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers. NOAA Technical Report NOS 65 NGS1 National Geodetic Survey, Rockville, pp 1–133
Schaffrin B (1987) Approximating the Bayesian estimate of the standard deviation in a linear model. Bull Geod 61(3): 276–280
Schaffrin B, Wang ZW (1994) Multiplicative outlier search using homBLUP and an equivalence theorem. Manuscr Geod 20(1): 21–26
Smith AFM, Roberts GO (1993) Bayesian Computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B 55: 3–24
Strang G, Borre K (1997) Linear algebra, geodesy and GPS. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Cambridge, Mass
Verdinelli I, Wasserman L (1991) Bayesian analysis of outlier problems using the Gibbs sampler. Statist Comput 1: 105–117
Wolf PR, Ghilani CD (1997) Adjustment computations: statistics and least squares in surveying and GIS, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
Xu P (1987) A test method for many outliers. ITC J 4: 314–317
Xu P (1991) Least squares collocation with incorrect prior information. Z Vermess Wes 116(6): 266–273
Xu P, Rummel R (1994) Generalized ridge regression with applications in determination of potential fields. Manuscr Geod 20(1): 8–20
Xu P, Rummel R (1994) A simulation study of smoothness methods in recovery of regional gravity fields. Geophys J Int 117: 472–486
Yang Y (1991) Robust Bayesian estimation. Bull Geod 65(3): 145–150
Zhu J (1995) Bayesian hypothesis test for determination analysis. Geomatica 49(3): 283–288
Zhu J, Ding X, Chen Y (2001) The maximum likelihood ambiguity resolution based on Bayesian principle. J Geod 75(4): 175–187
Zhu J, Santerre R (2002) Improvement of GPS phase ambiguity resolution using prior height information as a quasi-observation. Geomatica 56(3): 211–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gui, Q., Li, X., Gong, Y. et al. A Bayesian unmasking method for locating multiple gross errors based on posterior probabilities of classification variables. J Geod 85, 191–203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0429-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0429-8