Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian unmasking method for locating multiple gross errors based on posterior probabilities of classification variables

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper puts forward a Bayesian method for multiple gross errors location and estimation, and studies the masking and swamping problem in multiple gross errors detection from a new point of view, further proposes the corresponding feasible solution. First, the Bayesian method for gross error location is established based on the posterior probabilities of classification variables, each of which is used to determine whether each observation contains gross error or not. When some interactions exist among observations with multiple gross errors, the above-mentioned method may lead to the failure of detection due to masking and swamping. For that, on the basis of analyzing the character of masking and swamping, starting from the eigen structure of the sample correlation coefficient matrix of the classification vector, we give the Bayesian unmasking method to locate multiple gross errors, and design the corresponding algorithm, namely the adaptive Gibbs sampling algorithm. Finally, applying the mean shift model, we raise a Bayesian approach to estimate gross errors. Significant applications of the approach show the promising results on overcoming masking and swamping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MCMC:

Markov chain Monte Carlo

References

  • Aduol FWO, Schaffrin B (1986) On outlier identification in geodetic networks using principal component analysis. Conference on Influential Data Analysis, Sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Awange JL (2005) Diagnosis of outlier of type multipath in GPS pseudo-range observations. Surv Rev 38(297): 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Baarda W (1968) A testing procedure for use in geodetic networks. Publication on Geodesy, New series 2 No.5, The Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft

  • Baselga S (2007) Critical limitation in use of τ test for gross error detection. J Surv Eng 133(2): 52–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berber M, Hekimoglu S (2003) What is the reliability of conventional outlier detection and robust estimation in trilateration networks? Surv Rev 37(290): 308–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Betti B, Crespi M, Sansò F (1993) A geometric illustration of ambiguity resolution in GPS theory and a Bayesian approach. Manuscr Geod 18(6): 317–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y (1983) Estimating crustal deformations from a combination of baseline measurements and geophysical models. Bull Geod 57(3): 294–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossler JD (1972) Bayesian inference in geodesy. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

  • Cen M, Li Z, Ding X, Zhuo J (2003) Gross error diagnostics before least squares adjustment of observations. J Geod 77: 503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Kavouras M, Chrzanowski A (1987) A strategy for detection of outlying observations in measurements of high precision. Can Surveyor 41(4): 529–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung LK (1974) A course in probability theory. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross PA, Price DR (1985) A strategy for the distinction between single and multiple gross errors in geodetic networks. Manuscr Geod 10(4): 172–178

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lacy MC, Reguzzoni M, Sansò F, Venuti G (2008) The Bayesian detection of discontinuities in a polynomial regression and its application to the cycle-slip problem. J Geod 82: 527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lacy MC, Sansò F, Rodriguez-Caderot , Gil AJ (2002) The Bayesian approach applied to GPS ambiguity resolution, A mixture model for the discrete-real ambiguities alternative. J Geod 76: 82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding X, Coleman R (1996) Multiple outlier detection by evaluating redundancy contributions of observations. J Geod 70: 489–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethrog U (1991) Statistical test of significance for testing outlying observations. Surv Rev 31(240): 62–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalt DJ (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Götzelmann M, Keller W, Reubelt T (2006) Gross error compensation for gravity field analysis based on kinematic orbit data. J Geod 80: 184–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui Q, Gong Y, Li G, Li B (2007) Bayesian approach for detection of gross errors based on posterior probability. J Geod 81: 651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo J, Ou J, Wang H (2007) Quasi-accurate detection of outliers for correlated observations. J Surv Eng 133(3): 129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi AS, Simonoff JS (1993) Procedures for the identication of multiple outliers in linear models. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 1264–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekimoglu S (1997) The finite sample breakdown points of outlier detection procedures. J Surv Eng 123(1): 15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekimoglu S (1999) Robustifying conventional outlier detection procedures. J Surv Eng 125(2): 69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekimoglu S, Erenoglu RC (2007) Effect of heteroscedasticity and heterogeneousness on outlier detection for geodetic networks. J Geod 81: 137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Justel A, Pena D (2001) Bayesian unmasking in linear models. Comput Stat Data Anal 36: 69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Preimesberger T, Allesch M, Pail R, Bouman J, Koop R (2005) Outlier detection algorithms and their performance in GOCE gravity. J Geod 78: 509–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1990) Bayesian inference with geodetic appliances. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (2007) Introduction to Bayesian statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR (2007) Outlier detection in observations including leverage points by Monte Carlo simulations. Allg Verm-Nachr 114: 330–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch KR, Papo H (2003) The Bayesian approach in two-step modeling of deformations. Allg Verm-Nachr 110(111): 365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubik K, Wang Y (1991) Comparison of different principles for outlier detection. Aust J Geod Photogram Surv 54: 67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Gui Q, Xu A (2008) Bayesian method for detection of gross errors based on classification variables (in Chinese). Acta Geod Cartogr Sin 37(3): 355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JS (2001) Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou Z (1991) Approximative Bayes estimation for variance components. Manuscr Geod 16(4): 168–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou Z (1993) Bayesian inference for variance factor with maximum entropy prior. Manuscr Geod 18: 242–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelzer H (1980) Some criteria for the accuracy and reliability of networks. DGK Reihe B Nr 252: 55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope AJ (1976) The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers. NOAA Technical Report NOS 65 NGS1 National Geodetic Survey, Rockville, pp 1–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B (1987) Approximating the Bayesian estimate of the standard deviation in a linear model. Bull Geod 61(3): 276–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin B, Wang ZW (1994) Multiplicative outlier search using homBLUP and an equivalence theorem. Manuscr Geod 20(1): 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AFM, Roberts GO (1993) Bayesian Computation via the Gibbs sampler and related Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B 55: 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang G, Borre K (1997) Linear algebra, geodesy and GPS. Wellesley-Cambridge Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdinelli I, Wasserman L (1991) Bayesian analysis of outlier problems using the Gibbs sampler. Statist Comput 1: 105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf PR, Ghilani CD (1997) Adjustment computations: statistics and least squares in surveying and GIS, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P (1987) A test method for many outliers. ITC J 4: 314–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P (1991) Least squares collocation with incorrect prior information. Z Vermess Wes 116(6): 266–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Rummel R (1994) Generalized ridge regression with applications in determination of potential fields. Manuscr Geod 20(1): 8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Rummel R (1994) A simulation study of smoothness methods in recovery of regional gravity fields. Geophys J Int 117: 472–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y (1991) Robust Bayesian estimation. Bull Geod 65(3): 145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1995) Bayesian hypothesis test for determination analysis. Geomatica 49(3): 283–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Ding X, Chen Y (2001) The maximum likelihood ambiguity resolution based on Bayesian principle. J Geod 75(4): 175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Santerre R (2002) Improvement of GPS phase ambiguity resolution using prior height information as a quasi-observation. Geomatica 56(3): 211–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. Gui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gui, Q., Li, X., Gong, Y. et al. A Bayesian unmasking method for locating multiple gross errors based on posterior probabilities of classification variables. J Geod 85, 191–203 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0429-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0429-8

Keywords

Navigation