Abstract
Although its use is widespread in several other scientific disciplines, the theory of tensor invariants is only marginally adopted in gravity field modeling. We aim to close this gap by developing and applying the invariants approach for geopotential recovery. Gravitational tensor invariants are deduced from products of second-order derivatives of the gravitational potential. The benefit of the method presented arises from its independence of the gradiometer instrument’s orientation in space. Thus, we refrain from the classical methods for satellite gravity gradiometry analysis, i.e., in terms of individual gravity gradients, in favor of the alternative invariants approach. The invariants approach requires a tailored processing strategy. Firstly, the non-linear functionals with regard to the potential series expansion in spherical harmonics necessitates the linearization and iterative solution of the resulting least-squares problem. From the computational point of view, efficient linearization by means of perturbation theory has been adopted. It only requires the computation of reference gravity gradients. Secondly, the deduced pseudo-observations are composed of all the gravitational tensor elements, all of which require a comparable level of accuracy. Additionally, implementation of the invariants method for large data sets is a challenging task. We show the fundamentals of tensor invariants theory adapted to satellite gradiometry. With regard to the GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) satellite gradiometry mission, we demonstrate that the iterative parameter estimation process converges within only two iterations. Additionally, for the GOCE configuration, we show the invariants approach to be insensitive to the synthesis of unobserved gravity gradients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balmino G, Barriot J, Koop R, Middel B, Thong NC, Vermeer M (1991) Simulation of gravity gradients: a comparison study. Bull Géod 65:218–229
Baur O, Grafarend EW (2006) High-performance GOCE gravity field recovery from gravity gradients tensor invariants and kinematic orbit information. In: Flury J, Rummel R, Reigber C, Rothacher M, Boedecker G, Schreiber U (eds) Observation of the Earth system from space. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 239–253
Baur O, Sneeuw N (2006) Slepian approach revisited: new studies to overcome the polar gap. ESA SP-627, Proceedings 3rd GOCE user Workshop, Frascati
Bölling K, Grafarend EW (2005) Ellipsoidal spectral properties of the Earth’s gravitational potential and its first and second derivatives. J Geod 79(6–7):300–330. doi:10.2007/s00190-005-0465-y
Colombo OL (1981) Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere. Department of Geodetic Science, Report 310, Ohio State University, Columbus
Dahlen FA, Tromp J (1998) Theoretical global seismology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Eringen AC (1962) Nonlinear theory of continuous media. McGraw-Hill, New York
ESA SP-1233 (1999) The four candidate Earth explorer core missions—gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. European Space Agency Report SP-1233(1), Granada
van Gelderen M, Koop R (1997) The use of degree variances in satellite gradiometry. J Geod 71(6):337–343, doi:10.2007/s001900050101
Grunsky H, Schur I (1968) Vorlesungen über Invariantentheorie. Springer, Heidelberg
Gurevic GB (1964) Foundations of the theory of algebraic invariants. P. Noordhoff, Groningen
Grafarend EW (1970) Die Genauigkeit eines Punktes im mehrdimensionalen Euklidischen Raum. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Series C 153, Munich
Hilbert D (1890) Über die Theorie der algebraischen Formen. Math Ann 36:473–534
Hilbert D (1893) Über die vollen Invariantensysteme. Math Ann 42:313–373
Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002a) A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very-high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions. J Geod 76(5):279–299, doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0216-2
Holmes SA, Featherstone WE (2002b) Extending simplified high-degree synthesis methods to second latitudinal derivatives of geopotential. J Geod 76(8):447–450, doi:10.1007/s00190-002-0268-3
Holota P (1989) Boundary value problems and invariants of the gravitational tensor in satellite gradiometry. In: Sansò F, Rummel R (eds) Theory of satellite geodesy and gravity field determination. Lect Notes Earth Sci, vol 25. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 447– 457
Ilk KH, Visser P, Kusche J (2003) Satellite gravity field missions. Final Report Special Commission 7, vol 32, General and technical reports 1999–2003
Klees R, Koop R, Visser P, van den IJssel J (2000) Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations. J Geod 74(7–8):561–571, doi:10.2007/s001900000118
Klingbeil E (1966) Tensorrechnung für Ingenieure. BI Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim
Korn GA, Korn TM (2000) Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. Dover, New York
Lemoine FG, Kenyon SC, Factor JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp RH, Olson TR (1998) The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA Geopotential Model EGM96. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, pp 575
Moritz H (1985) Inertia and gravitation in geodesy. In: Schwarz KP (ed) Inertial technology for surveying and geodesy
Pail R, Plank G (2002) Assessment of three numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry implemented on a parallel platform. J Geod 76(8):462–474. doi:10.2007/s00190-002-0277-2
Pail R, Schuh W-D, Wermuth M (2005) GOCE gravity field processing. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes J (eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 36–41, doi:10.1007/3-540-26932-0_7
Petrovskaya MS, Vershkov AN (2006) Non-singular expressions for the gravity gradients in the local north-oriented and orbital reference frames. J Geod 80(3):117–127, doi:10.2007/s00190-006-0031-2
Rapp RH, Cruz JY (1986) Spherical harmonic expansions of the Earth’s gravitational potential to degree 360 using 30′ mean anomalies. Ohio Sate University, Columbus, Report 376, Department of Geodetic Sciences and Surveying
Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, König R, Meyer U, Neumayer KH, Schwintzer P, Zhu SY (2005) An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S. J Geodyn 39(1):1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jog2004.07.001
Rummel R (1986) Satellite gradiometry. In: Sünkel H (ed) Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical geodesy. Lect Notes Earth Sci, vol 7, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 317–363
Rummel R, Sansò F, van Gelderen M, Brovelli M, Koop R, Miggliaccio F, Schrama E, Scerdote F (1993) Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, New Series, p 39
Sacerdote F, Sansò F (1989) Some problems related to satellite gradiometry. Bull Géod 63:405–415
Schreiner M (1994) Tensor spherical harmonics and their application in satellite gradiometry. Doctoral Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, p 386
Schuh W-D (1996) Tailored numerical solutions strategies for the global determination of the Earth’s gravity field. Mitteilungen der Universität Graz, p 81
Sneeuw N, van Gelderen M (1997) The polar gap. In: Sansò F, Rummel R (eds) Geodetic boundary value problems in view of the one centimeter geoid. Lect Notes Earth Sci, vol 65. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 559–568
Sneeuw N (2000) A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Series C 527, Munich
Thông NC (1989) Simulation of gradiometry using the spheroidal harmonic model of the gravitational field. Manuscr Geod 14(6):404–417
Vermeer M (1990) Observable quantities in satellite gradiometry. Bull Géod 64:347–361
Weitzenböck R (1923) Invariantentheorie. P. Noordhoff, Groningen
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baur, O., Sneeuw, N. & Grafarend, E.W. Methodology and use of tensor invariants for satellite gravity gradiometry. J Geod 82, 279–293 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0178-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0178-5