Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health risks, past usage, and intention to use weight loss products in normal weight women with high and low body dysphoria

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: There are many health risks involved with the use of weight loss products by normal weight women. The mass media may compound this problem through the promotion of weight loss products and a thin body size. This study tested women’s perceptions of different weight loss product ads to determine if body dysphoria (i.e., an over concern with body size and shape in normal weight people) was associated with risk beliefs, past behaviors, and intention toward using weight loss products. Method: Normal weight women (age range = 18–41 yr), who were classified as either high (n=45) or low (n=43) on a measure of body dysphoria, rated different weight loss products according to their perception of health risks, past behavior, and their intention to consume the products. These products were a dietary fat substitute (olestra), a prescription obesity medication (sibutramine), and an over-the-counter appetite suppressant (phenylpropanolamine). Results: High body dysphoric women reported higher intentions to use the products as well as increased prior use of two of the three weight loss products. High body dysphoric women did not believe that these weight loss products were harmless. They recognized potential health risks associated with using such products, but nonetheless, expressed intention to use these weight loss products at a higher frequency. Also, several variables related to body image were found to effectively discriminate normal weight women at risk for abusing weight loss products. Discussion: This study found that women who do not need to lose weight but have significant body image concerns were willing to use potentially harmful weight loss products despite the knowledge that such products might pose significant health risks. Techniques utilized by advertising regulatory agencies such as warning labels did not have a strong deterrent effect for stated intentions to use the products. Implications of these findings for public health policy issues were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleland R., Graybill D.C., Van Hubbard L.K.K., Stern J.S., Wadden T.A., Weinsier R., Yanovski S.: Commercial weight loss products and programs: What consumers stand to gain and lose a public conference on the information consumers need to evaluate weight loss products and programs. Clin. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 41, 45–70, 2001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berzins L.G.: Protecting the consumer through truth-in dieting laws. J. Soc. Issues, 2, 371–382, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton S., Netemeyer R.G., Lichtenstein D.: Gender differences for appearance-related attitudes and behaviors: Implications for consumer welfare. J. Public Policy & Marketing, 13, 60–75, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whisenhunt B.L., Williamson D.A., Netemeyer R.G., Womble L.G.: Reliability and validity of the psychosocial risk factors questionnaire (PRFQ). Eat. Weight Disord., 5, 1–6, 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rabak-Wagner J., Eickhoff-Shemek J., Kelly-Vance L.: The effect of media analysis on attitudes and behaviors regarding body image among college students. J. Am. Health College, 47, 29–35, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grigg M., Bowman J., Redman S.: Disordered eating and unhealthy weight reduction practices among adolescent females. Prev. Med., 25, 748–756, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williamson D.A., Muller S.M., Reas D.L., Thaw J.A.: Cognitive bias in eating disorders: Implications for theory and treatment. Behav. Modif., 23, 556–577, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williamson D.A.: Body image disturbances: A form of cognitive bias? Eating Disorders, 4, 47–58, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrews J.C., Netemeyer R.G., Burton S.: Consumer generalization of nutrient claims on advertising. J. Marketing, 62, 62–75, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoch S.J., Young-Won Ha: Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. J. Consumer Res., 13, 221–233, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke R.R., DeSarbo R.L.O., Robertson T.S.: Deception by implication: An experimental investigation. J. Consumer Res., 14, 483–494, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luque C.A., Rey J.A.: Sibutramine: A serotoninnorepinephrine reuptake-inhibitor for the treatment of obesity. Ann. Pharmacother., 33, 968–978, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergholz C.M.: Safety evaluation of olestra, a nonabsorbed, fat-like fat replacement. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 32, 141–146, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hampl J.S., Sheeley A.E., Schnepf M.I.: Sounding the alarm for misuse of olestra-containing foods in binge-eating disorders [Letter to the editor]. J. Am. Diet. Assoc., 98, 971, 1998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bulik C.M.: Abuse of drugs associated with eating disorders. J. Subst. Abuse, 4, 69–90, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper P. J., Taylor M.J., Cooper Z., Fairburn C.G.: The development and validation of the Body Shape Questionnaire. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 6, 485–494, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller S.M., Williamson D.A., Martin C.K.: Reconstructing reality: The false consensus bias and its relationship to body dysphoria. Poster presented at the 32nd annual convention of the association for the advancement of behavior therapy, Washington, DC, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson D.A., Barker S.E., Bertman L.J., Gleaves D.H.: Body image, body dysphoria, and dietary restraint: Factor structure in nonclinical subjects. Behav. Res. Ther., 33, 85–93, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jackman L. J., Williamson D.A., Netemeyer R.G., Anderson D.A.: Do weight preoccupied women misinterpret ambiguous stimuli related to body size? Cognitive Ther. Res., 19, 341–355, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kutlesic V., Williamson D.A., Gleaves D.A., Barbin J.M., Murphy-Eberenz K.P.: The Interview for the Diagnosis of Eating Disorders IV: Application to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Psychol. Assess., 10, 41–48, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stunkard A.J., Messick S.: The Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. J. Psychosom. Res., 29, 71–83, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Brown G.K.: Beck Depression Inventory-2nd] Edition. The Psychological Corporation: San Antonio, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andrews J.C., Burton S., Netemeyer R.G.: Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? The role of nutrition knowledge, ad-claim type, and disclosure conditions. J. Advertising, 29, 29–43, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moorman C.: The effects of stimulus and consumer characteristics on the utilization of nutrition information. J. Consumer Res., 17, 362–374, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T.: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York, Sringer-Verlag, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jacobson M., Corcoran L.: Snack attack: olestra. Nutrition Action Healthletter, (March), 9–11, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, 6400 Perkins Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA

    B. L. Whisenhunt & D. A. Williamson M.D.

  2. McIntire School of Commerce, Charlottesville, University of Virginia, VA, USA

    R. G. Netemeyer

  3. Marquette University, Milwakee, WI, USA

    C. Andrews

Authors
  1. B. L. Whisenhunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. A. Williamson M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. G. Netemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Williamson M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whisenhunt, B.L., Williamson, D.A., Netemeyer, R.G. et al. Health risks, past usage, and intention to use weight loss products in normal weight women with high and low body dysphoria. Eat Weight Disord 8, 114–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325000

Key words

Search

Navigation