Skip to main content
Log in

Studies in quantitative inheritance

V. chromosome analyses of crosses between selected and unselected lines of different body size indrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    A crossing method is described for creating all possible combinations of major chromosomes from pairs of inbred lines ofDrosophila melanogaster. The twenty-seven different genotypes in females, eighteen in males, provide the basis for different tests which throw light on the genetic control of body size.

  2. 2.

    Complete chromosome analyses have been carried out on two pairs of contrasted lines of different size, descended from the Nettlebed and Edinburgh wild stocks. Each such pair comprises a small line, descended from a strain selected for small body size, and an approximately normal-sized line, inbred without selection from the same stock. Three unrelated lines inbred without selection have been studied in a similar way, except that twenty-one out of the twenty-seven possible combinations for each pair have been studied in females only.

  3. 3.

    The accuracy of the method of combining chromosomes was demonstrated by the agreement between preparations of the same genotype by different means, and also by the level of the within-culture variance, which was generally of the same order as that for untreated inbred lines.

  4. 4.

    The within-culture variance is not constant for all genotypes, but tends to decline with an increase in the number of heterozygous pairs of chromosomes.

  5. 5.

    When the unselected and small lines are crossed, a highly non-additive situation is revealed by the size of theF 1 which may be as great, or nearly as great, as the size of the unselected parent line.

  6. 6.

    In the analysis of the unselected and small Edinburgh lines the size of the different types could be accounted for by aggregate dominance of the chromosomes of the larger

  7. 7.

    In the Nettlebed combinations, aggregate dominance and additive combination of non-homologous chromosomes account for the size of the majority of the types. But there are also a number of striking interactions which increase or decrease size, leading to different effects of particular substitutions and different dominance relations in different genetic backgrounds. Most of the larger interactions occur in genotypes carrying several chromosomes from the small line. The behaviour of the X-chromosome of the small line is exceptional in being incompletely recessive in all backgrounds.

  8. 8.

    In the combination of chromosomes from the unrelated, unselected, inbred lines, interactions between non-homologous chromosomes are much more frequent and striking. The substitution of a single chromosome or of a homozygous pair may increase or decrease size, according to the genetic background.

  9. 9.

    Inter-crossing these unrelated inbred lines always leads to heterosis in theF 1, which exceeds both parent lines in size. This heterosis cannot be accounted for merely in terms of the summation of the effects of dominance or over-dominance on different chromosomes, but must be considered in terms of gene interaction. The effects of making each pair of chromosomes heterozygous in otherwise homozygous backgrounds may be compared with the joint effects of making two or more pairs heterozygous. In several cases, the presence of a single pair of heterozygous chromosomes may lead to a body size quite as large as in the fully heterozygous type, and actually exceeding the size of types with two heterozygous pairs. But, in one series, on the other hand, increase in the number of heterozygous pairs of chromosomes increases size more than the sum of the individual effects.

  10. 10.

    The results are discussed in relation to the mechanism of heterosis, inbreeding decline and possible ways in which selection has changed the genotype to produce small size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gowen, J. W., Stadler, J. &Johnson, L. E. (1946). On the mechanism of heterosis—the chromosomal or cytoplasmic basis for heterosis inDrosophila melanogaster.Amer. Nat. 80, 500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. (1943). Polygenic inheritance and natural selection.Biol. Rev. 18, 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. &Reeve, E. C. R. (1952a). Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection of wing and thorax length inDrosophila melanogaster.J. Genet. 50, 414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. &Reeve, E. C. R. (1952b). Heterozygosity, environmental variation.Nature, Lond.,170, 296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, F. W. &Reeve, E. C. R. (1953). Studies in quantitative inheritance. IV The effects of substituting chromosomes from selected strains in different genetic backgrounds.J. Genet. 51, 586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, E. C. R. &Robertson, F. W. (1953a). Studies in quantitative inheritance. II. The analysis of a strain ofDrosophila melanogaster selected for long wings.J. Genet. 51, 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, E. C. R. &Robertson, F. W. (1953b). The analysis of environmental variability in quantitative inheritance.Nature, Lond.,171, 874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, A. G. (1936). The effect of autosomal inversions on crossing-over inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics,21, 615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, F. S. (1942). The genetic mechanism of heterosis as demonstrated by egg production inDrosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State College Library, Ames, Iowa.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Member of the Agricultural Eesearch Council Scientific Staff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robertson, F.W. Studies in quantitative inheritance. J Genet 52, 494–520 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985075

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985075

Keywords

Navigation