Skip to main content
Log in

Right and left proximal femur analyses: Is there a need to do both?

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if differences existed between right and left proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of women. Participants for the study were 198 women ranging in age from 16 to 73 years. Bone mineral densities of both proximal femurs (femoral neck, Ward's area, and trochanter) were assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar DPX). Mean (±SD) age, height, and weight of the participants were 32.9±18 years, 164±7.4 cm, and 64.9±12.1 kg, respectively. Significant differences between right and left femoral BMDs were found only in the trochanter. Overall, mean differences in BMD were low (neck=0.7%, Ward's =0.2%, and trochanter=1.9%) but individual variations were as high as 22%. Based on BMD z-scores of <−1.0, 84 women were classified as “at risk” for osteoporosis. When right and left z-scores were compared, misclassifications of at risk women were 4, 15, and 11 for neck, Ward's area, and trochanter, respectively. In conclusion, analyses of both right and left proximal femurs may not be necessary for either the researcher or the clinician.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pouilles J, Tremollieres F, Ribot C (1993) Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? Calcif Tissue Int 52:344–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Griffin MC, Rupich RC, Avioli LV, Pacifici R (1991) A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1990) Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11:347–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1993) Long-term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 8:1227–1233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensurd K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai K, Rencken M, Drinkwater BL, Chestnut CH (1993) Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision. Calcif Tissue Int 53:225–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Center for Health Statistics (1987) Department of Health and Human Services, Publication No. 87-1688, Hyattsville, MD

  8. Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonnick, S.L., Nichols, D.L., Sanborn, C.F. et al. Right and left proximal femur analyses: Is there a need to do both?. Calcif Tissue Int 58, 307–310 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509376

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509376

Key words

Navigation