Skip to main content
Log in

Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of our study was to compare the results provided by the measurement of vertebral and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) for assessing the individual risk of osteoporosis as defined by either low BMD and/or rapid bone loss. Vertebral and femoral BMD were measured twice at a mean interval of 21 months in 85 normal, early post-menopausal women who had passed a natural menopause 6 months to 3 years previously. According to the measurement site, 36% (spine), 29% (femoral neck), 35% (Ward's triangle), and 25% (trochanter) fall in the “at risk” category, defined by a BMD value of 1 SD or more below the normal values for premenopausal women. Based on vertebral BMD, 39–48% of the women at risk had a normal femoral BMD. On the other hand, 24–37% of the women classified at risk based on femoral BMD maintained a low risk at the vertebral level. The annual rate of bone loss was significantly greater for the Ward's triangle (-2.7±3.8%) and femoral neck (-2.1±2.5%) than for the spine (-1.5±2.1%) and trochanter (-1.5±3.4%). There was a significant relationship between the rate of loss measured at the spine and femoral levels (r=0.34–0.58). Among the 21 women with a rapid vertebral bone loss, 48–67% had a low bone loss at the femoral level and vice versa. The ratio between mean rate of loss and the precision of the measurement sites was greater for the spine (1.6) compared with the femur (1.1–0.71). Our results indicate that vertebral and femoral BMD measurements produce discordant results in assessing the individual risk for osteoporosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slemenda CW, Hui SL, Longcope C, Wellman H, Johnston CC (1990) Predictors of bone mass in perimenopausal women. A prospective study of clinical data using photon absorptiometry. Ann Int Med 112:96–101

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ribot C, Pouillès JM, Bonneu M, Trémollières F (1992) Assessment of the risk of post-menopausal osteoporosis using clinical factors. Clin Endocrinol 36:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston CC, Melton LJ, Lindsay R, Eddy DM (1989) Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. J Bone Miner Res 4(suppl 2):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melton LJ, Eddy DM, Johnston CC (1990) Screening for osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 112:516–528

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Scott JC, Cummings SR (1991) Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? Ann Int Med 115: 837–842

    Google Scholar 

  6. Melton LJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1991) Long-term fracture risk prediction with bone mineral measurements made at various skeletal sites (abstract) J Bone Miner Res 6(suppl 1):S136

    Google Scholar 

  7. Need AG, Nordin BEC (1990) Which bone to measure? Osteoporosis Int 1:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Heilbrun LK, Vogel JM (1987) Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction. Clin Orthop Rel Res 216:262–269

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ribot C, Trémollières F, Pouillès JM, Louvet JP, Guiraud R (1988) Influence of the menopause and aging on spinal density in French women. Bone Miner 5:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pouillès JM, Trémollières F, Todorovsky N, Ribot C (1991) Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 6:997–1001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Christiansen C, Riis BJ, Rodbro P (1990) Screening procedure for women at risk of developing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 1:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin MG, Rupich RC, Avioli LV, Pacifici R (1991) A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:1164–1169

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazess RB, Barden HS (1990) Interrelationships among bone densitometry sites in normal young women. Bone Miner 11: 347–356

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones CD, Laval-Jeantet AM, Laval-Jeantet MH, Genant HK (1987) Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis. Bone 8:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eastell R, Mosekilde LI, Hodgson SF, Riggs BL (1990) Proportion of human vertebral body that is cancellous. J Bone Miner Res 5:1237–1241

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nottestad SY, Baumel JJ, Kimmel DB, Recker RR, Heaney RP (1987) The proportion of trabecular bone in human vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res 2:221–229

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sandor T, Felsenberg D, Kalender WA, Clain A, Brown E (1992) Compact trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 50:502–506

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bohr H, Schaadt O (1985) Bone mineral content of the femoral neck and shaft: relation between cortical and trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Int 37:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reid IR, Evans MC, Ames R, Wattie DJ (1991) The influence of osteophytes and aortic calcification on spinal mineral density in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1372–1374

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duboeuf F, Braillon P, Chapuy MC, Haond P, Hardouin C, Meary MF, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ (1991) Bone mineral density of the hip measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in normal elderly women and in patients with hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int 1:242–249

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC (1989) The effect of age and menopause on bone mineral density of the proximal femur. J Bone Miner Res 4:639–642

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Ettinger M, Johnston C, Dawson-Hughes B, Baran D, Powell M, Notelovitz M (1987) Spine and femur density using dual-photon absorptiometry in US white women. Bone Miner 2:211–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pouilles, J.M., Tremollieres, F. & Ribot, C. Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis?. Calcif Tissue Int 52, 344–347 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310196

Key words

Navigation