Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental changes in composition and quality of prickly pear cactus cladodes (nopalitos)

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The composition and quality of edible tender stems or cladodes of 3 Prickly Pear Cactus species (Opuntia amyclaea, O. ficus-indica, and O. inermis) were studied at different stages of development. This traditional Mexican vegetable is called “nopalitos” in Spanish and “cactus leaves” in English. Cladodes harvested when 20 cm in length have the following average composition per 100 g: 91.7 g of water, 1.1 g of protein, 0.2 g of lipid, 1.3 g of ash, 1.1 g of crude fiber, 4.6 g of complex carbohydrates and 0.82 g of simple sugars, 12.7 mg of ascorbic acid and 28.9 µg of carotenes. The cladode's juice has an average pH of 4.6, 0.45% titratable acidity and 6.9% soluble solids. The components which varied most during development of the cladodes were: carotenes, acidity and total carbohydrates which increased, and protein and crude fiber (acid-detergent) which decreased. The nutritive value of the tender cladodes in the stages of growth at which they are commonly harvested and consumed (15 to 25 cm long weighing 50 to 80 g per stem), was similar for the 3 species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acevedo E, Badilla I, Nobel PS (1983) Water relations, diurnal acidity changes, and productivity of a cultivated cactus,O. ficus-indica. Plant Physiol 72: 775–780

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon (1981) El Nopal. Publicación Especial No. 34. Mexico City: Comisión Nacional de Zonas Aridas e Instituto Nacional de Investigación Forestal, 86 pp

  3. AOAC (1984) Official Methods of Analysis, 14th ed. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1141 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrientos-Pérez F (1965) El nopal y su utilización en México. Rev Soc Mex Historia Natural 26: 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bicalho UO, Penteado M de VC (1981) Estudo do fruto e do artículo daOpuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miler cultivada em Valinhos SP I. Characterísticas bromatológicas. Rev Farm Bioquim Univ S Paulo 17(1): 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo-Hollis H (1978) Las Cactáceas de México. Mexico City: UNAM, pp 62–83

    Google Scholar 

  7. Camarillo B, Grajeda JE (1979) Estudio comparativo de cinco selecciones de nopal para consumo humano. Proc Trop Reg Amer Soc Hort Sci 23: 236–238

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feitosa-Teles FF (1977) Nutrient analysis of prickly pear (O. ficus-indica, Linn.) Tucson: University of Arizona, PhD dissertation, 157 pp

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feitosa-Teles FF, Stull JW, Brown WH, Whiting FM (1984). Amino and organic acids of the prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica L). J Sci Fd Agric 35: 421–425

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gortner WA (1965) Chemical and physical development of the pineapple fruit and plant pigment constituents. J Food Sci 30(1): 30–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haard NF (1976) Characteristics of edible plant tissues. In: Fennema OR (ed) Principles of Food Science. Part I. Food Chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp 41–137

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haytowitz DB, Matthews H (1984) Composition of Foods: Vegetables and Vegetable Products. USDA Agric Handbook No 8–11: 222, 385

  13. Hernández M, Chávez A, Bourges H (1980) Valor nutritivo de los alimentos mexicanos. Publicación L-12, 8th ed Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición, 34p

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery CD (1976) Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 121 pp

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robles-Contreras F (1986) Efecto de la frecuencia de riego sobre las relaciones hídricas, producción y calidad de nopal para verdura (Opuntia ficus-indica). Hermosillo, México: University of Sonora, Professional Thesis, 66 pp

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriquez-Felix A (1986) Cambios quimicos y fisiológicos durante el desarrollo de cladodios (nopalitos) de 3 especies deOpuntia. Hermosillo, México: Center for Food Research and Development, MS Thesis, 83 pp

    Google Scholar 

  17. Somogyi M (1952) Notes on sugar determination. J Biol Chem 195: 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Terada M, Watanabe Y, Kunitomo M, Hayashi E (1978) Differential rapid analysis of ascorbic acid and ascorbic acid-2-sulfate by dinitrophenylhydrazine method. Anal Biochem 84: 604–608

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tractenberg S, Mayer AM (1982) Mucilage cells, calcium oxalate crystals and soluble calcium inOpuntia ficus-indica. Ann Bot (London) 50(4): 549–57

    Google Scholar 

  20. Villarreal F, Rojas Mendoza P, Arrellano V, Moreno J (1963) Estudio quimico sobre seis especies de nopales (Opuntia spp). Ciencia 22(3): 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez-Felix, A., Cantwell, M. Developmental changes in composition and quality of prickly pear cactus cladodes (nopalitos). Plant Food Hum Nutr 38, 83–93 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092314

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092314

Key words

Navigation