Skip to main content
Log in

Necessitarianism and teleology in Aristotle's biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Aristotle's biological works, there is an apparent conflict between passages which seem to insist that only hypothetical necessity (anagkē ex hypotheseōs) operates in the sublunary world, and passages in which some biological phenomena are explained as simply (haplōs) necessary. Parallel to this textual problem lies the claim that explanations in terms of simple necessity render teleological explanations (in some of which Aristotle puts hypothetical necessity to use) superfluous. I argue that the textual conflict is only apparent, and that Aristotle's notion of coincidental sameness allows him to avoid the superfluity problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balme, D. M.: 1939, ‘Greek Science and Mechanism I’,Classical Quarterly 33, 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, D. M.: 1972,Aristotle's De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J.: 1984,The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 2 volumes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, M. and F. D. Miller, Jr.: 1984, ‘Teleology and Natural Necessity in Aristotle’,History of Philosophy Quarterly 1, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, W.: 1970,Aristotle's Physics I and II, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, A.: 1976, ‘Aristotle's Response to Quine's Objections to Modal Logic’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, A.: 1976a, ‘The Persistence of Aristolian Matter’,Philosophical Studies 29, 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, R. M.: 1978, ‘On Some of Aristotle's Second Thoughts About Substance: Matter’,Philosophical Review 87, 372–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.: 1983, ‘Matter and Necessity inPhysics B 9, 200a15–30’,Ancient Philosophy 3, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.: 1986, ‘Simple Necessity in Aristotle's Biology’, forthcoming inInternational Studies in Philosophy.

  • Gotthelf, A.: 1976, ‘Aristotle's Conception of Final Causality’,Review of Metaphysics 30, 226–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F. A.: 1982, ‘Accidental Sameness in Aristotle’,Philosophical Studies 42, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preus, A.: 1975,Science and Philosophy in Aristotle's Biological Works, Georg Olms, Hildescheim and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W. D.: 1949,Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R.: 1980,Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, R. Necessitarianism and teleology in Aristotle's biology. Biol Philos 1, 355–365 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127111

Key words

Navigation